Are Genetically Modified Peanuts Any Improvement on the Real Thing?

re: Are Genetically Modified Peanuts Any Improvement on the Real Thing?

Jimmy — Fri, 29 Dec 2006 01:41:04 GMT

In most European Nations GMO foods have been outlawed because they know how harmful they are. That also goes for Amalgam fillings which can contain up to 50% Mercury. It never ceases to amaze me how in the USA people are still so brain washed and believe our government is protecting them. Are we just stupid? Come on!!! Let's do something about this sh*t rather then just chatting about it. Count me in!

re: Are Genetically Modified Peanuts Any Improvement on the Real Thing?

Josh Rubin — Thu, 28 Dec 2006 23:31:05 GMT

GMO foods reduce allergies and antioxidants? Are they serious or are they that thick in the head and blinded by their own b*!!%*#t?

re: Are Genetically Modified Peanuts Any Improvement on the Real Thing?

Suzanne_203 — Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:48:20 GMT

One day a glass of red wine in the evening is good for you, the next week it's not. One week an asprin a day is the answer, then it's not. Your morning cup of coffee is ok one day but the next day is not. Just examples of how we are being intentionally confused and they really do mean to keep you in the dark always wondering. Now what's this got to do with peanuts, I don't know.

re: Are Genetically Modified Peanuts Any Improvement on the Real Thing?

Russ Bianchi — Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:30:29 GMT

Like I have lamented before, a day does not seem to go by without some stupid, dangerous, unhealthful decision, or recall of a previously approved substance/food/beverage/drug, in the headlines, by government officials.

He (or She) who stays furthest away from bureaucrats and their wacko systems, or decrees, relying on common sense, will be happier, healthier, and safer.

re: Are Genetically Modified Peanuts Any Improvement on the Real Thing?

enzo — Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:29:05 GMT

Peanuts...also known as goober peas...Are they mostly goobers, or mostly peas?