<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.mercola.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Why Would the FDA Approve a Less Effective Contraceptive?</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2007/01/25/Why-Would-the-FDA-Approve-a-Less-Effective-Contraceptive.aspx</link><description>Considering all the problems associated with existing drug-based forms of birth control , why would anybody consider taking a less effective kind, yet that's exactly what FDA advisers recommended this week. An advisory panel voted against setting a standard</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Build: 31106.3070)</generator><item><title>re: Why Would the FDA Approve a Less Effective Contraceptive?</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2007/01/25/Why-Would-the-FDA-Approve-a-Less-Effective-Contraceptive.aspx#88742</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:18:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:88742</guid><dc:creator>Joan McGovern Tendler</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;&lt;font color=#000000&gt;In the 1960’s, Dr. Ellen Grant ran trials of many different doses of birth control pills. As she writes in her book, &lt;u&gt;Sexual Chemistry,&lt;/u&gt; in these early Pill trials 6 percent breakthrough bleeding (indicating ovulation) was considered to be the safe contraceptive limit, and s&lt;span style="COLOR: black"&gt;ome of the early Pills that were rejected in the 1960’s for poor pregnancy protection are prescribed today in slightly higher or even lower doses.&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;At least&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"&gt; &lt;/b&gt;one brand of 20 mcg birth control pill prescribed today has 30 percent breakthrough bleeding, far more than 6 percent. This indicates that there have been &lt;u&gt;many&lt;/u&gt; unplanned pregnancies and, in fact, over 50 % unplanned pregnancies are due to contraceptive failure! &lt;span style="COLOR: black"&gt;But now there is abortion to take care of many of these pregnancies, as well as&amp;nbsp;the birth defects, so this problem is not well-known. &lt;?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;Dr. Mercola is one the very few doctors willing to tell the truth about birth control pills. I found this out while researching this subject for my teenage daughter. This is how I discovered this site and I want to thank him very sincerely-you truly may have saved my daughter’s life!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=88742" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why Would the FDA Approve a Less Effective Contraceptive?</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2007/01/25/Why-Would-the-FDA-Approve-a-Less-Effective-Contraceptive.aspx#88741</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:33:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:88741</guid><dc:creator>Zarrah</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Dr. Mercola, thank you for your last paragraph! As a DO, I hope you are familiar with &lt;A href="http://www.naprotechnology.com/"&gt;NaPro Technology &lt;/A&gt;and the Creighton Model of Fertility Care. It's amazing&amp;nbsp;stuff and far, far from the world of harmful fertility and anti-fertility treatments/drugs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=88741" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why Would the FDA Approve a Less Effective Contraceptive?</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2007/01/25/Why-Would-the-FDA-Approve-a-Less-Effective-Contraceptive.aspx#88740</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:19:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:88740</guid><dc:creator>Russ Bianchi</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;A plane with 100 seats on it, piloted by FDA career Big Pharamceutical drug approval officials takes off.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;All but two of the seats are filled, with additional FDA drug review panel scientists, buraeucrats, lawyers and Congressional and legislative liasons.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The plane crashes and all are prounced DEAD at the impact crater.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What does one call this?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A tragedy the last 2 seats were not filled from the FDA payroll.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=88740" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why Would the FDA Approve a Less Effective Contraceptive?</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2007/01/25/Why-Would-the-FDA-Approve-a-Less-Effective-Contraceptive.aspx#88739</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:51:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:88739</guid><dc:creator>mmc88121</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;If conventional medicine will set the standards, you know they will be low.&amp;nbsp; They have to have something to put money in their pocket book.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;mmc88121&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=88739" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>