Why Do Drugmakers Still Defend the Use of Mercury in Their Vaccines?

re: Why Do Drugmakers Still Defend the Use of Mercury in Their Vaccines?

Tilapia2006 — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:11:42 GMT

I've posted on here before about my 18 month old already having some vaccines before I knew the dangers, and everyone was so helpful and encouraging. I have another question/concern. Since she has already had the first "phases" of some vaccines that require 2 or 3 total shots, is there any danger to discontinuing the vaccines after already having 1 or 2, of the 3 shots? Does having only "part" of the total immunization make her vulnerable or put her in danger in any way? I've heard that not finishing the immunization could cause her to actually end up with the disease that is being immunized against. Is this true? I just want her to be healthy and it bugs me that I already allowed her to have the vaccinations up to this point. I'd love to hear any feedback on this. Thanks.

re: Why Do Drugmakers Still Defend the Use of Mercury in Their Vaccines?

mysticeyes2810 — Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:11:06 GMT

how could anyone say that the vaccines are not what caused this I have a daughter she was about 3 when we found out she had AUTISM SPECTRUM at the age of 2 she was potty trained and talked she had the vaccines the GOVERMENT requires our children to have now she has to be in a special school to correct this and is not potty trained anymore and she is now almost 6yr how could the government explain that how could the numbers just keep going up just within a yr the numbers went from 1-166 to now 1-156 I believe it is the vaccines the goverment convinces us that the vaccines arent the problem and we get our children vaccinated thinking were helping our children.

re: Why Do Drugmakers Still Defend the Use of Mercury in Their Vaccines?

HAPPY LADY — Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:04:20 GMT

MOM OF THE TWINS. SAME SHOES AS ME. HERE IS A WEB SITE THAT WILL HELP YOU. CHECK IT OUT. GOD BLESS YOU YOU WON'T NEED THAT STUFF THAT GIVES YOU THE WARM FUZZY FEELING. IT IS ALSO HELPING CHILDREN WHO ARE AUTISTIC.
CHECK IT OUT. THEY ARE NATURAL PRODUCTS. www.hamartin.com

re: Why Do Drugmakers Still Defend the Use of Mercury in Their Vaccines?

N. C. — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:24:21 GMT

I have been recovering from mercury poisoning from vaccines and my mercury fillings. As far as I am concerned if you have disease from vaccines or dental mercury fillings or drugs you and I deserve it. Too many have replaced trust in God with trust in man and have paid the extreme price. So eat your junk food, place those toxic fillings, drink your fluoride, inject your babies, feed them dead milk, take your man made drugs and when your faced with sickness who will you call? Who will save you then?

re: Why Do Drugmakers Still Defend the Use of Mercury in Their Vaccines?

minnie-me — Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:25:35 GMT

My grandson regressed into autism, the trigger being a flu shot at 19 months of age. He was fully vaxed up to that point, and my daughter was "guilted" into allowing that shot. Soon after, he became very ill, lost most of his developing language and began to display many autistic-like behaviors. He is one of four children..the only one to have a flu shot and the only one to become autistic. He is being treated biomedically and has been chelating with transdermal dmps and glutithione, along with diet and a barrage of other compounded supplements. We ARE getting him back, but it is a slow, expensive process.

What really froths me is that BigPharma is trying harder than ever to control Compounding Pharmacies! Those who turn to biomedical interventions rely on custom Rxs, cutting into the profitable Drug Market that they have created with their vaccines! Senators Edward Kennedy, Richard Burr and Pat Robertson have drafted the "Safe Drug Compounding Act of 2007" which will in essence, put the FDA in charge of overseeing Compounding Pharmacies. If  successful, this act will restrict and possibly deny access to these medications:
This just goes to show the cycle that has been carefully planned and orchestrated by this greedy industry! Here is a link to learn more and take action, if you wish:
http://www.iacprx.org/site/PageServer?pagename=P2C2001secKennedyLeg

Yep...impose even MORE vaccines, increase the number of neurological injuries, wipe out the competition, and sell more drugs to a captive market...sounds like a plan to me! Yikes...it just goes on and on, doesn't it?

re: Why Do Drugmakers Still Defend the Use of Mercury in Their Vaccines?

red dragon — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:21:45 GMT

I just want to tell someone that when my kids were of vaccination age, I did not want them to be vaccinated, but was threatened by the medical authorities. They said that the children would be removed from my care if I did not allow it. The oldest child had convulsions and fainting spells for months after and now has myriad health problems that the other two don't have.

re: Why Do Drugmakers Still Defend the Use of Mercury in Their Vaccines?

John Gualt — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:02:22 GMT

One thing that nobody seems to ever mention when trying to figure out why the government, drug companies, medical establishment, etc. continue to support, promote and mandate things that are harmful to the people is that it is being done intentionally to destroy us as a people.
I know this sounds outrageous to most people. But, after over 20 years of researching such actions, I can come to no other conclusion. Look at this from that perspective and it all starts to make sense. There is plenty of evidence to support this being the case. Before condemning me as a nut case, think about it for a while.

re: Why Do Drugmakers Still Defend the Use of Mercury in Their Vaccines?

Alternative Medicine Man in Arizona — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:24:38 GMT

Several years ago, a client of mine, who is a retired pharmaceutical industry executive, openly admitted that "farming" is the term used among many of his former colleagues in the industry, referring to the "planting the seeds of disease into the public, and then sitting back, to await the eventual 'bumper-crop' of money-making diseases that will emerge". He also stated that diseases such as diabetes, cancer, and many childhood medical conditions are a direct result of this. He finished with the statement that disease is considered by the pharmaceutical industry to be an "immensely profitable commodity", no different than real estate, gems, petroleum or precious metals. He pointed to one such example, which is the Pennsylvania "Dutch" (Amish) community where autism is virtually non-existent in areas where religious exemption prohibits infants and children from receiving any vaccine injections, whatsoever. The very fact that Thimerosal is still allowed to be used is an appalling and outrageous demonstration of how corrupt the pharmaceutical industry really is, along with its "lapdog", the FDA. This is NOT just some "left wing, whacko conspiracy theory". . . This is the REAL world, where concern for profits far outweighs ethics, or concern for the children of their fellow human beings. One final note; The "silence of the media" on this, and many other such issues, has been "guaranteed" by the immense increase in advertising revenues, by the pharmaceutical industry. "You don't bite the hand that feeds you" is the rule in broadcasting, where in some outlets, pharmaceutical industry advertising revenues make up nearly 85% of annual advertising revenues! The "cure" for autism, attention-deficit-hyperactive disorder, and many other neurological disorders, is the elimination of ALL vaccinations, which have now been proven to be the primary CAUSE of these conditions.

re: Why Do Drugmakers Still Defend the Use of Mercury in Their Vaccines?

JudgeBluey — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:50:55 GMT

Blah, blah, blah,......I'll say it again. So long as you have a Birth Certificate with ALL CAPS name, you are a ward of the State, and "they" can do anything they want to your body, your baby's body, your husband or wife's body, without so much as a by your leave.
If anyone believes they wish to change what is the "Status Quo", then stop complaining and do something positive about the situation.
If you wish to see the cause of any problems in your lives......look no further than the mirror.......the problem is you!!!!!!!
IF YOU THINK WHAT YOU ALWAYS THINK, AND DO WHAT YOU ALWAYS DO,......THEN YOU'LL GET WHAT YOU ALWAYS GET!!!

re: Why Do Drugmakers Still Defend the Use of Mercury in Their Vaccines?

drmarc_203 — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:09:48 GMT

Just like in the U.S., Health Canada has also buried it's head in the sand. It's officials also ignore the wealth of data on mercury and continue to recommend the flu shot. But even better than that, the flu shot is FREE to all residents of Ontario. My tax dollars are essentially funding the poisoning of countless numbers of people and also paying for the expensive TV advertising ( propaganda) promoting the free shots. It is interesting to note that the government program was initially started to lower the number of emergency room visits to hospitals in Ontario. Unfortunately, subsequent studies have shown this to NOT be the case. Emergency room volume in 5 Toronto area hospitals had NOT decreased at all. However, once again, this is ignored and the program of free shots rolls on at the cost of millions of dollars to the tax payers.

Furthermore, every flu season, Health Canada laboratories receive more than 60,000 samples from "flu victims" for lab confirmation of influenza contamination. Year after year, the results confirm that less than 10% of samples tested were actually influenza. The vast majority were influenza-like-illness ( ILI) of which the vaccine has no effect whatsoever. This notwithstanding that the vaccine uses three strains of influenza from the PREVIOUS YEAR and doesn't account for any genetic mutation during the year. All this data is ignored is favor of the sacred cow called vaccines.

re: Why Do Drugmakers Still Defend the Use of Mercury in Their Vaccines?

PDexercise — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 05:05:07 GMT

Attention: All new parents!
You must do your homework on this!

I refused to vaccinate my son 17 years ago (today).
He has NEVER had an ear infection.
He has had 3 colds in his life and has never had the flu.
I believe he will forever be healthier than others as he ages.
And no, school is not a problem.

Do not be sheep.
Question authority-especially when it's Big-Pharma!
Do your homework-Your children will thank you!

Oh..and one more thing.
Your family is your business.
You do not need to discuss it with anyone. They won't understand unless they do the research too!

Save the children!!!!!

:-)

re: Why Do Drugmakers Still Defend the Use of Mercury in Their Vaccines?

jennifer howard — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:23:52 GMT

After reading much research from both sides of the vaccination debate, no one can convince me that vaccinations of any kind are safe--esp. for the inchoate systems of children. I have too many friends with autisitic children, one of whom has a very low functioning autistic son. They have all been told that the cause or one contributing factor of this condition was the vaccintations their children were given.

Thermisol is not the only toxic ingredient in these shots! I encourage all parents who plan to vaccinate to do their homework first. And the first step there is to ask for the paperwork right off of the vaccination packaging. You cannot be refused this information and it will, if read thoroughly, probably convince you not to vaccinate.

If you do not have a religious, philosophical or ethical problem with the shots you should have a problem with doctors completely inundating your child's undeveloped system with known carcinogens, like aluminum products, with what "trace" amounts of mercury (even in the so-called mercury free shots) and formaldehyde. There is a disclaimer on this paperwork that explicitly says that the mutagenic, carcinogenic and effects of the vaccintions on fertility are not known.

On top of all of this egregious nonsense I would like someone to justify to me why children should be exposed to ever-increasing amounts of chemicals so that working mothers do not miss days off of work to care for sick children. This is the reason given for the administration of the chicken pox vaccine!

What's worse is that useless vaccinations (as they all are, but some have even been deemed obsolete by the medical community) are still being administered. Even pediatricians who are relatively caught up on their research will tell you that the polio virus is not an issue anymore and that it will not be given for much longer. Get with it people!

re: Why Do Drugmakers Still Defend the Use of Mercury in Their Vaccines?

UKMUM — Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:11:24 GMT

I'm the mother of three, 2 boys (ASD) and a girl (NT).
When my eldest son was diagnosed, about 4 years ago, I started reading up on the subject of Autism in order to help him and to try to prevent my youngest son (who I was expecting at the time) from going the same way.

One of the articles I read was "Autism: a novel form of mercury poisoning" (2001, S. Bernard, A. Enayati, L.Redwood, H.Roger, T.Binstock). After reading this I was absolutely convinced that the thimerosal in the DTP vaccines was the cause of my son's autism. Consequently, when my youngest came to be vaccinated, I insisted on thimerosal free vaccines, confident that this was the solution. Unfortunately I was wrong - at 12 months old, he seemed fine and had started to repeat words and name things. Then he had the last DTP vaccination (later than usual) and within a few days his language stopped entirely. To cut a long story short, he is now autistic, about 2 years behind in his language development and will have to go to an ASD unit instead of a mainstream school.

Now I can't say for certain what caused his condition, but after seeing the video (Vaccination - The Hidden Truth) and reading some of Viera Scheibner's work, I now suspect that some other part of the vaccination, in combination with a genetic predisposition, was responsible.

The reason I'm sharing this with you is that I've read a lot on this site recently about the thimerosal-autism connection. Whilst thimerosal-free vaccines may be the answer for some people, they did not help my youngest son.

re: Why Do Drugmakers Still Defend the Use of Mercury in Their Vaccines?

SignificantHealing — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 13:51:14 GMT

Heavy metal and toxin detoxification can be challenging to remove from the body. Recently I heard about zeolites.    The patent and research studies are astounding for this naturally occuring substance.

In one study, after just one week, most of the toxins are removed.

                                      Liver   Breast       Brain         Total
Toxins found before      845       876          875         2,596
Toxins found after            88       115          124            327

Percentage Removed     90%     87%        86%          87%

I ordered some, and am awaiting arrival of this odorless, tasteless liquid. I have read many testimonies ...... anyone have some?

Victoria Smith, BS.HT
http://www.NCDpro.com/victoria   (I ordered wholesale, so I have a site you can look at. Wholesale prices are available to anyone.)

re: Why Do Drugmakers Still Defend the Use of Mercury in Their Vaccines?

TTElayne — Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:59:51 GMT

I am the Aunt of an autistic nephew. Our family has done extensive research into the causes of his condition. We have no doubt that mercury in his infant vaccinations played a major role, if not primary role in his autism. He was born premature and possibly given a double-dosage of the Hepatitis vaccination. Luckily his parents have the means to bring him to a DAN doctor (Defeat Austim Now) who has placed him on a special diet as well as supplements. He is also receiving therapy and special education. My point here - the media continues to refuse to report the connection between vaccinations and autism. They are beholden to the pharma companies who are their largest advertisers - they are scared. So many children are diagnosed too late and going untreated in the early stages that can make a differnce in the childs long term outcome. Their parents are unaware of their options and how diet can make a major change in the childs condition. Until the media decides to do some real "investigative reporting" (instead of focusing on Brittney's shaved head) autism will continue to occur in what we call "the greatest nation". Despicable.