Congress Could Block HPV Vaccine Mandate

re: Congress Could Block HPV Vaccine Mandate

Josh Rubin — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:18:41 GMT

I think I have posted about HPV before, but here is my take on it:

It still fascinates me how "they" always focus on the symptom of a bigger problem. So "they" see HPV as a problem, so "they" develop something in order to wipe it out? Why not work backwards and try to figure out where it is coming from?From all my reading and research, I have to somewhat disagree with the findings in articles supporting that cervical cancer is caused by just HPV.

"Women are much more likely to get cervical cancer if they have been on the pill." Dr. Lee

A pap smear tests form cancerous or precancerous cells on the cervix. Therer are 5 classes: 1) normal 2) inflammation or irritation 3) cervical dysplasia 4)some pre or cancerous cells 5) invasive cancer. The problem with this test according to Dr. Lee is that there are a lot of false-positive's, giving a more serious rating than there already is. According to Dr. Lee, positive findings in a pap smear happen from: traumatic sex, tampons, condoms, smoking, douches and spermicides on condoms. As well, progesterone deficiency can also contribute to cervical dysplasia secondary to making the cervix more susceptible to inflammation and irritation (secondary to the women being estrogen dominant).

So most MD's look at cervical dysplasia as the byproduct from HPV. In my opinion from treating so many women that are estrogen dominant, have low progesterone levels, smoke, have sex, use condoms, etc, what do you think the cause might be? I am not saying these are the only reasons, but why not consider them before taking a vaccine?

"We know that the use of oral contraceptives increases the risk of cervical dysplasia by AT LEAST 50% and the risk of cervical cancer by AT LEAST 25%." Dr. Lee

re: Congress Could Block HPV Vaccine Mandate

TALKINGHERBALS — Sun, 18 Mar 2007 20:49:45 GMT

While I have no idea why, I do know that even very small amounts of xylitol make both my husband and I horribly dizzy... To the point where I won't even get behind the wheel of a car and drive. Sometimes it's followed by an odd sort of headache that usually doesn't go away until I've taken a nap. I can't use it.

re: Congress Could Block HPV Vaccine Mandate

jennifer howard — Sun, 18 Mar 2007 14:25:54 GMT

I have read many booklets for all of the childhood vaccinations right off the packages. Every one of them says that the mutagenic, carcinogenic and fertility effects of the vaccine have not been studied. Just wondering, will these booklets say the same thing? How inane can we, as a country, become?! Here's an idea, let's give ourselves cancer with the childhood round of vaccines and then create vaccines to counter the carcinogenic effects of those vaccines...it could be a never ending, money making cycle! Jump on the pharmaceutical bandwagon everyone! If you pass this mandatory cycle of vaccines through Congress you could get 1/2 off the retail price! Ridiculous.

re: Congress Could Block HPV Vaccine Mandate

PPARGammaGirl — Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:51:17 GMT

Put your keyboard where your mouth is!

Not literally, vote with your technology. Tell the senate to vote no to HPV vaccines. Apparently every email and phone call – no letters because they worry about anthrax – from a citizen is counted as 13,000 opinions. They assume that for every 1 person contacting them with an issue, there are 12,999 couch potatoes who feel the same but don’t act on it. Go to this website, pick your senator and email him you opinion – all from the comfort of your own home:

http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

What do senators worry about more than anything – re-election. Make your opinions known, spread the word. The more people that contact the senate – the bigger voice the people have.

re: Congress Could Block HPV Vaccine Mandate

Russ Bianchi — Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:00:54 GMT

K Street Lobbyists out number the total members of the US Congress (House and Senate) by some ridiculous ratio, that I hazard to guess, but it is significant, if not OBSCENE.

When the Republicans where voted out of the majorities in the last election cycle, the Big Pharma lobbyists (averaging about a quarter million dollars base salary each, & upward, based on effectiveness - which is CHUMP CHANGE in this seedy world of BRIBERY) were already scrambling to get more pro industry representation (translated from the Pig Latin - BOUGHT & PAID FOR VOTES) on the Democratic side of the isle.

It would appear by this latest news, the forces of darkness and unhealthiness, are again at it, to HARM YOUR HEALTH, and that of YOUR FAMILY & FRIENDS, to improve their bottom lines in PROFIT.

Vote the bums out, on both sides of the aisle, that are supporting such death merchants' attempts to legislate such blatant EVIL.