SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
The HPV Vaccine -- Merck's Corporate Profiteering Endangers Your Child's Health

An interesting piece from the Alliance for Human Research Protection reacts to the financial motivations behind Merck's desperate push for new funding streams in the wake of the Vioxx debacle, namely the needless human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, Gardasil.

Even more abominable is the campaign to make Gardasil a mandatory vaccine in the United States and a blockbuster that has been dubbed by some as the Help pay for Vioxx litigation, something I warned you about not so long ago.

The numbers, however, tell a different tale. Some 11,000 women will be diagnosed with cervical cancer and about 3,700 die from it this year, according to the American Cancer Society. By comparison, 16 times more American women will be diagnosed with breast cancer (178,480), and 11 times more will die (40,460) from it.

Unfortunately, the mainstream media is falling for this newest brightest vaccine, even though it doesn't protect a women from some non-vaccine HPV types, according to Merck's own information.

Remember, you don't need a high-priced, unproven and worthless vaccine -- more than $350 for a three-dose regimen -- to protect your children from cervical cancer.

Alliance for Human Research Protection February 8, 2007






 
 Do you find this article interesting?
Comment on This Article Community Comments (8)
 
 
Posted On Feb 20, 2007
This is a great subject.  Being a recombinant vaccine the risks of serious adverse effects are small.  However, cancer is not small.  I am a Periodontist and we are seeing a rise in oral cancer in never-smokers/drinkers that we are almost sure is related to the HPV.  A vaccine may have far reaching health effects that are very beneficial.  Do you consider the Polio vaccine bad.  I know people have things to gain, but if done right (which it may not be, esp. these days) the 3 personal friends with cancer and many others that I know would not having multiple cervical biopsies may not have been necessary.  Maybe it is avoidable in a perfect world - which we should always strive for!  But it's not.  I would love to see the data on the following statement if possible.

"In case you aren't familiar with HPV, it's a sexually transmitted disease that's virtually 100 percent avoidable without a vaccine.

Additionally, most cases of the infection clear up on their own. HPV can be overcome by means such as adequate sunlight exposure and vitamin D consumption, supplementation with probiotics, adequate intake of selenium and zinc, increased consumption of trace minerals and iodine, and regular physical exercise." 
Please realize I love the work you do, but even my wife calls me devils advocate man sometimes....
Respectfully,
Dr. G


 
Dr.G
Novice User Novice User, Joined On 1/2007
Dr.G  
Replied

vince_203
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 9/2006
vince_203  
 
Posted On Feb 21, 2007
 If the risk of vaccination is so small then how come producers won't even make them unless granted protection from lawsuits. We no that these shots cause side effects including death in some people in who they are given. If to prevent a relatively small number of cases of an easy to prevent cancer we mandate universal administration it is quite possible that we case more disease than we prevent The difference is how we perceive these occurrences. If someone has anyone off the multiple reactions to the drug it is easy to minimize the connection. The shot did not cause the side effect. If someone has the shot but still contracts the illness  'thats extremely rare' . A recent study on flu vaccination showed that they really did not do what was expected. These facts make it absolutely essential that this matter is left to the individuals judgement. Why mandated we as a society almost take the moral authority over life and death because it is very likely that the people damaged by the shots are not the same ones that might be damaged by the disease


Dr.G
Novice User Novice User Joined On 1/2007
Dr.G  
 
Posted On Mar 02, 2007
Just to be clear:  I am absolutely against manditory vaccination for HPV.  It's ludicrous for tax payers to shoulder the burden and the government would take such a position on an individuals health decisions.  I would support manditory offering of the facts and access to the vaccine. 

While signs of the disease may resolve that doesn't guarantee eradication of the virus.  The fact is it is not a perfect, well educated, highly intelligent world out there and protection from a virus that may be transmitted sexually and possibly by other means would be a nice choice.  Abstinence sounds good, but doesn't quite make it to the real world at the 100% level.
Dr. G

 
 
 
Posted On Feb 19, 2007
This is a good article.  It shows some of the "dark side" of the drug companies.  And brings some interesting facts into the public view.

mmc88121

 
mmc88121
Moderator User Moderator User, Joined On 11/2006
mmc88121  
Replied

Russ Bianchi
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 9/2006
Russ Bianchi  
 
Posted On Feb 19, 2007
At the pace of daily revelations of EVIL and CORRUPTION of the pharmaceutical industry on TOXIC and KILLING brands discovered to be BAD, I'm beginning to believe there is no LIGHT side to them in their present form, and SHAM approval processes, at FRAUD DECEIT ALWAYS (FDA).

 
 
 
Posted On Feb 19, 2007
Getting HPV is 100% preventable for women who manage to avoid being raped or sexually abused in some way. Not to mention women who want to be sexually active with the men who don't want to wear condoms (maybe because they've been circumcised, which removes the most sensitive part of the penis and the body replaces it with scar tissue which is much less sensitive). So while there are questions about the intentions of the drug company I'm curious about the possible real impacts on real womens' lives...

 
Integral Eve
Novice User Novice User, Joined On 2/2007
Integral Eve  
 
 
 
Posted On Feb 21, 2007
According to a NJ newspaper:

Merck said yesterday it is immediately suspending its lobbying campaign to persuade state legislatures to mandate that adolescent girls get the company's vaccine against cervical cancer as a requirement for school attendance....

http://www.nj.com/starledger/stories/index.ssf?/base/business-0/117203625298570.xml&coll=1

 
Jimmy
Novice User Novice User, Joined On 11/2006
Jimmy  
 
 
 
Posted On Feb 19, 2007
About 15 years ago, I first heard of HPV at the hospital where I work. At that time, a physician group on staff was participating in an international research project on HPV. I asked one of the docs about it. Remember- this was 15 years ago. He said it was a virus that caused cervical cancer. That it was spreading so fast throughout the world that they estimated that within as little as 8 years- it could be considered a "normal flora." They had identified some 46 possible types of the virus. He said, like the herpes virus, it could lay dormat and the strength of the immune system could determine and even halt its progression. Further, the programs pushing condomn use and annual papsmear screening in the US would lower the prevalence. Quicker follow-up on abnormal cells on papsmears and enhanced papsmears were two
goals. 
You gotta wonder if the vaccine is 100% necessary as the pharm co would like it to be and if in another 15 years- what will the effect of 100% vaccination be? I guess HPV would definitely be a "normal flora" then!!!

 
Matilda_203
Novice User Novice User, Joined On 12/2006
Matilda_203  
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.