SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
Drug Company's Latest Tricks to Control Congress

The pharmaceutical companies clearly manipulate Congress with their overwhelming lobbying, but it’s always interesting to see the details of just how these schemers operate.

Case in point, drug company giant Eli Lilly has made a temporary shift in their contributions to favor the new Democrat congressional majority. The company has already given nearly $60,000 in all to both parties in the first four months of 2007.

To really cover their bases, Eli Lilly has also planted key lobbyists with influence, such as one of their in-house lobbyists who used to be the top GOP aide on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

In all, the pharmaceutical and health-products industry has spent more on lobbying -- over $1 billion -- in the last decade than any other industry.

Their influence is just massive. Eli Lilly alone spent $3.7 million on lobbying last year, and employed 40 lobbyists to represent its interests. This year, they’ve already hired on three new outside lobbying firms.

But as pervasive as the drug companies may be in Washington, the word is getting out about their deceptive practices, and we are really starting to make a difference to transform our fatally flawed health care system.

USAToday.com May 28, 2007


Dr. Mercola's Comment:

The pharmaceutical companies clearly manipulate Congress with their largest lobbying force, but it's always interesting to see the details of just how these schemers operate. 

If you didn't see the video in the last issue of the newsletter you simply have to watch it.  I have never seen a better example of how the drug cartel is raping the US public. This video from Sixty Minutes is a MUST see for every American, and other international readers will also enjoy seeing how far our political system has gone down the corruption line.

Eli Lilly alone spent $3.7 million on lobbying last year, and employed 40 lobbyists to represent its interests. This year, they've already hired three new outside lobbying firms. To really cover their bases, Eli Lilly has also tried to ensure that their key lobbyists have massive influence, such as one of their in-house lobbyists who used to be the top GOP aide on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

If just a portion of the funds drug companies use to change the laws in their favor were allocated to optimizing food and stress concerns, we would have more than enough funds left over to help the more than 40 million Americans walking around without any health coverage. But the drug companies are not out for your best interest, they are out for their own bottom line profit to their shareholders. That is their mandate.

The influence of the drug companies is just massive. In addition to their pull with Congress, the drug companies also have a huge influence on the majority of published studies and nearly all of medical education. This influence causes physicians to use their expensive symptomatic Band-Aids as solutions for people's problems instead of addressing the underlying cause.

But as pervasive as the drug companies' influence may be in Washington, the word is getting out about their deceptive practices, and we are really starting to make a difference to transform this fatally flawed health care system.

Related Articles:





 
 Do you find this article interesting?
Comment on This Article Community Comments (39)
 
 
Posted On Jun 02, 2007
I am new to this site and it heartens me to read the thinking of so many intelligent, informed Americans.  It is becoming increasingly difficult to view TV with all of the drug commercials.  If you weren't ill before you started watching, you will begin to imagine some disorder before the night is out.  We mute out the sound, but the images are still there.  Is there no regulation to be done to staunch the flow of this insidious message "you are ill and you need to tell you doctor to give you a pill"?  And Ron Paul is an amazing politician.  Linda Hoy

 
linlouwho
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 5/2007
linlouwho  
Replied

cheftodd
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 4/2007
cheftodd  
 
Posted On Jun 02, 2007
Maybe not,  but we are one BIG  FAMILY!   looking for good food good health, and the right to decide what course we want our health to go in.


KathieJamisonCote
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 4/2007
KathieJamisonCote  
 
Posted On Jun 02, 2007
Welcome linlouwho and one thing that makes this site sooo cool is there are folks from many different places around the world - seeking  better ways to eat, better ways to live and sharing thought provoking ideas.  


minnie-me
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 2/2007
minnie-me  
 
Posted On Jun 03, 2007
HI linlouwho! You are right on the nose...I can't watch TV anymore. I am sick to death of pharmaceutical adds. I don't even have cable, but the regular stations do their share to bow to big pHARMa, as much as the next guy! I tried reading magazines, but they are full of 2 and 3 page adds for Paxil, Ritalin, Viagra, Mevacor, Boneva, Gardasil....I could go on. I spend a fair amount of time on line, but even so, the pop up ads are the same...and then there's the radio..arrrggghhh!!!!!  
 
Well, all the advertising in the world won't influence me. I haven't taken a Rx drug in over 5 years. Anything that needs fixing can be done through my Alternative Health Care Dr.  Sadly, there is no regulation, yet they manage to limit alternative products to infomercials...shame!

And you are right, Ron Paul is an amazing  Politician.


Witch Doctor
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 9/2006
Witch Doctor  
 
Posted On Jun 04, 2007
I have not watched TV in 7 or 8 years (can't recall when I got divorced - but at least no one's expecting me to keep track of dates anymore!).  I listen to the radio, instead.  Recently I made the mistake of tuning in a station that was simply playing a TV news type show on the radio.  When I heard the TV pharmaceutical commercials, I was (I hate this word) "shocked".  I know, that puts up images of a violent shudder going through my body, or my body flying unwillingly against a wall, or something.  I'm never going to use that word again.


Bridestein
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 12/2006
Bridestein  
 
Posted On Jun 05, 2007
Duane - personally, I like "that sends a shrivel up my butt" a wonderfully graphic malapropism from my brother upon trying brussel sprouts for the first time. (instead of 'shiver up my back')      ;-)


Reesacat
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 1/2007
Reesacat  
 
Posted On Jun 05, 2007
Gammagirl, I thought you were joking until I saw the link and read the
story!  I am gobsmacked, poleaxed, dumbfounded and shocked!

The drug ads are bad enough on US tv-but at least they are presented as advertisments.  This sounds alot like the "infomercials" we have now.



Witch Doctor
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 9/2006
Witch Doctor  
 
Posted On Jun 06, 2007
Reesacat - thanks  for being gobsmacked, poleaxed, etc..., in my place, because that saves me from all that trauma.


Peter Booker
Novice User Novice User Joined On 5/2007
Peter Booker  
 
Posted On Jun 23, 2007
Welcome - but, we are not all Americans, but encompass most of the world's population - this means that you will get  truly global information and opinions


Marnie1
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 1/2007
Marnie1  
 
Posted On Jun 25, 2007
The answer to getting the ads off TV is to contact your congressman.  Many times.  Every day.  Send a letter to the other sponsers of the TV program telling them you will boycott their products if they continue to advertise on the same program as the drug companies.  My 4 1/2 year old son is being programmed by these commercials--how horrified do you think I was when he asked me if he should talk to his doctor about Cialis????  It's is unacceptable, and I send letters every day.

It's illegal to advertise alcohol and tobacco on TV, drugs should be on as well.

 
 
 
Posted On Jun 01, 2007
The solution remains the same, you must take control of your own health, as the good Doctor daily advises, & do not purchase ANY of these NEEDLESS & HARMFUL drugs from Big Pharma.

Preventative models are vastly superior to reactive ones in safety, cost, compliance, protocol, & net beneficial outcomes FOR ALL.

If Big Pharma has no revenue, they cannot hire lobbyists, to bribe/buy Congresspersons (House & Senate as well as the Executive Branch), who's SOLE intent, in the vast majority of cases, is to protect their jobs, FAT pensions (which start at $15,000 per month for serving only one 2 year term in the US Congress - FOR LIFE), while doing as little to upset the apple cart (pesticide, herbicide, & gmo laden) as possible. 

Your Uncle Sam, or it's elected officials, or Uncle Sam's VAST & BLOATED bureaucracy (largest employer in the USA), have no intention of helping you, your family, or your health, when they know & stay in their jobs from those lobbyists keeping them there, hired by the likes of Big Pharma, or any other lobby group who care to fill in the blank with.

Will Rogers remains correct, some 70+ years later:  "Why, we have the best government money can buy..."

It is not hard to understand, in many circumstances, why the LEAST amount of government remains the best solution, as with your own personal health & happiness.

In pursuing that freedom toward happiness (& health), may I suggest the founders of our country did not imagine how gridlocked/corrupt our government & courts & tort system truly have become.

Remember, when any politician suggests, or actually implements, a cut, in any Federal program, it's a cut from an automatic annual 10% increase!

Yep, that's correct, Federal budgeting expands no mater what, to increase/protect the non term elected bureaucrats.  They win,we lose.

 
Russ Bianchi
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 9/2006
Russ Bianchi  
Replied

Reesacat
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 1/2007
Reesacat  
 
Posted On Jun 01, 2007
Most politicians are lawyers.  Explains alot.


mmc88121
Moderator User Moderator User Joined On 11/2006
mmc88121  
 
Posted On Jun 01, 2007
Russ, you sure said it a lot better than I could have.

Mary


annapavlova42
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 2/2007
annapavlova42  
 
Posted On Jun 01, 2007
Bush announced, that thay are not reducung Greenhouse gas emissions.  Are we surprised?  That global warming is not a problem.

Comments, anyone?


Russ Bianchi
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 9/2006
Russ Bianchi  
 
Posted On Jun 02, 2007
Few have addressed that the wobble of the axis of the Earth, in angled relation to the SUN, that deviates about every 12 to 25 thousand years, &creates a heating trend, and then ice ages.  This is geological record evidenced, & an irrefutable, FACT.

We are nearing, within the next 300 years, the nearest angle to solar radiation exposure, which is creating a geometric progression of CO2, & greenhouse gases, on top of man made, or produced, industrial expansion, sources for glob

Therefore, Al Gore IS correct that CO2 gases are SPIKING from measurable data. 

However, the former US Vice President, with an energy foot print 20 times that of any other average American, is WRONG on the CO2 & other carbon based green house gases all coming from man made sourcing.

CHINA, not the USA, is the number one producer of green house gases from man made sources globally (primarily sulfured based dirty coal or benzene producing diesel) & India is close behind.

CHINA & INDIA, with approximately 2.5 billion of the planet's 6.2 billion current population, are doing little, or NOTHING, to reduce pollution to rivers, lakes, oceans or the air, along with Brazil, Japan, Argentina, Venezuela, Russia, Korea, etc., & trying, along with other hypocritical nations, who are signatories the the Kyoto Accords, in blaming it all on non signatory, the USA.

To address your question Annapavlova42, if tomorrow the USA could magically wave a wand, & stop 100% of all pollution & greenhouse gases from the USA, there is vastly more cumulative pollution being produced elsewhere, we in the USA have zero control over, on this "pale blue dot", to borrow from Carl Sagan's description.

Is there a problem?  Yes.

Is there currently any leadership domestically, or internationally, to really address it, in a real result manner? No.

Will the Earth adjust? Probably.


annapavlova42
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 2/2007
annapavlova42  
 
Posted On Jun 02, 2007
Russ and everyone, the movie  "The Core"  starring Aaron Eckhart, Hilary Swank, and Delroy Lindo, really is not far from the truth ! ? .

Our earths Core is in trouble by natural and man-made bad decisions?

Then, how would it be possible for our planet to actually survive in the next 300 years? 

If by chance a serious of miracles and radical changes were to accure and wiser adjustments with  cleaning up our pollutions, world-wide, would  it be possible that the earth will correct itself and bring the earths core back to normal?

If not, could we presume that in 300 years or less, all life on earth will be distroyed?

Please respond, anyone.





Russ Bianchi
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 9/2006
Russ Bianchi  
 
Posted On Jun 02, 2007
KathyB & Annapovlova42 bring up an interesting aspect I have read just a little enough about to be dangerous in speculation, and am by no means any expert on the subject.

But the hypothesis goes something like this (and I could easily have it wrong); that there are electro magnetic fields produced by the molten core of the Earth (molten iron primarily) as the globe spins on it's wobbly axis. 

These fields create the polarity of north and south axis (which correlate and directly effect things like navigation, and therefore shipping, commerce, etc.).

If I understand the observations being made and reported correctly, there is a potential (how much or when remains unclear to me, or I believe anyone else - we could be talking many millennia still) of a FLIP in poles. 

Said another way, the south pole becomes the north, and the north becomes the south (geologically, we know this has happened before from tested rock formations). 

Additionally, a muddle-about middle ground period might also occur, where there is NO polarity occurring.

As to doomsday Hollywood sensationalist scenarios, I do not believe any of them and find the PROFIT motive the overriding factor behind most of these FALSE ASSERTIONS.


KathieJamisonCote
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 4/2007
KathieJamisonCote  
 
Posted On Jun 02, 2007
I've recently been reading more about the Mayan calendar and how it ends in 2012.  Coinciding with polor shifts due to sunspot activity.  A subject the Mayans knew about and documented.  There are also books that claim there will be assensions of those worthy and will be rescued before all h*ll breaks loose.  There will not be one boulder left in place in the polar shift.........and leading up to that time will be increases in storms..........(yikes)..........In the bible there's a time referred to as the "Rapture" when people will just disappear from this planet........maybe the UFO's will beam us up.................

Whether this is true or not, I'm going to do as Martin Luther King, Jr. said when asked what he would do if he knew the world was going to end tomorrow - He said "I will plant my apple tree today." 


jeremy_3
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 6/2006
jeremy_3  
 
Posted On Jun 03, 2007
RE: Man Made Global Warming

Recently I have learned information that leads me to believe Man Made Global Warming is a scam.. it can not be proven to be nothing more than a natural cycle of our planet. There is not proof that we cause global warming at all - it is all conjecture, aka.. junk science!

The Neo-Cons and globalist want to use it to rally a scare in the people and bring about a carbon tax that would even go as far as to tax carbon dioxide that we expel and the plants breath which gives us oxygen.. and some how this carbon dioxide is bad?? Come on we can't live without it...  and they want to effective tax your breathing!!!

Secondly warmer climate means more growth of trees and such around the world. Their cause seems equal to stopping the great flood of the earth or the ice age. Its impossible, and you can not fight the natural progression of our planet.. The plant will live on.. even after it decides to rid itself of it's poisons that walk the earth with 2 legs.

Once they control the food supply, the water supply and even our breathing we will no longer be living in the world we know! So fight these over zealous environmentalist, they are just pushing for control...

Yes we have pollution problems and things need to be done but their plans are nothing different than Allopathic medicine!



ladonnadavid
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 6/2006
ladonnadavid  
 
Posted On Jun 03, 2007
whether globlal warming is real, man-made, natural-accelerated-by-man is irrelevant.
The truth and hard facts are: You cannot consume indefinitely on a planet with finite resources, polluting and destroying as you go expecting no consequences, or repercussions for the next generation or yourself later in life.
That would be like taking a lawn mower into a closed garage w/two gallons of gas, leaving the mower running and try to, eat, live and sleep in those quaters with all your trash also.


jeremy_3
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 6/2006
jeremy_3  
 
Posted On Jun 05, 2007
View an excellent clip by Ron Paul speaking about our civil war, global warming, the CIA and the FAA. Ron Speaks of how you would need to control volcanoes and there is no proof as to the real cause. 

First appearance on Bill Maher a few month ago, today he says Ron Paul is his hero!  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo6KIusCBoU

 
 
 
Posted On Jun 03, 2007
This was awesome information.  Thank you.  I was a nurse in the emergency dept. for 4 months. Prior to that I worked on a post-open heart surgical floor for a year.  I saw first hand how the DRUG companies like Pfizer sugar-coat their way into the hospital; they bring lunch, candy, "party favors"...aka pens, paper, gym bags, scissors, name holders ALL with their new drug of the season labeled on it.  It is absolutely disgusting!  On top of it they send drug reps that do not know the drug from a sugar cube.  It is very frightening because a lot of these drugs have not been tested for very long and the majority have side effects to them-mostly dangerous ones. I recently lost my job, but have decided that I am done with majority of Western medicine. I find that it only benefits pharmaceutical companies which in turn create corporate monopolies, corruption and ultimately very sick and very poor people.
I decided to go back to school, or study on my own about natural medicine.  I am really involved trying to fight the New World Order.  This cruel game they play with the drugs is part of a Eugenics program/project.

 
nurseneanea
Novice User Novice User, Joined On 5/2007
nurseneanea  
 
 
 
Posted On Jun 03, 2007
I couldn't agree more. Too many people, including  my  mother are sucked into believing that the Dr. is  always right, and is apparent that the health industry is swallowed up by the $$$ incentives to prescribe lotions and potions, that keep people sick and cause more complicated health issues. Thank you for this web-site...We will be wise to read and question everything.

 
innerlimits
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 6/2007
innerlimits  
Replied

Karen Savage
Novice User Novice User Joined On 7/2007
Karen Savage  
 
Posted On Aug 27, 2007
Being in the health industry I do agree medications are often misused and over prescribed. We would all do well to get on the ban wagon to promote and advocate for health reform instead of just complaining about it. 

 
 
 
Posted On Jun 23, 2007
hi,

Is it just me or are Mercola's comments becoming barely a rewrite of the
summayr articles?

I've noticed this for the past week's newsletters.

Imean the first and third paragraph are identical. This staff member needs some coaching on his writing. I don't need to read the same thing twice.

Thanks

www.NoPainMOGain.com


 
yves
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 6/2006
yves  
Replied

curious7
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 3/2007
curious7  
 
Posted On Jun 23, 2007
Look at the content, not the structure.


drlaga
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2007
drlaga  
 
Posted On Jun 23, 2007
I agree with your comments.  Is Dr Mercola no longer writing his own commentary?  It doesn't seem so by this example which I noticed first thing--and which detracts from Dr Mercola's reputation.  Perhaps he's overworked.  I'd urge him to email the newsletter only twice a week [preferably one time a week].  But if twice weekly, have only 4 or 5 items/entries/articles--rather than 5 or more.  Sometimes I feel overwhelmed to read so much when I have a lot of other reading to do.
Reading "everything" in each newsletter begins to feel like an obligation rather than an interesting pleasure. 

As a Holistic Counselor [Nutrition-Fitness-Stresscare] for 33 yearsand as an editor, I know that the content, organization, language and delivery ["style"] are important in writing--and in public speaking.  Regardless of one's  profession, those who write comments should re-read their material a few times before submitting it.  

At this point in his career, Dr Mercola needs a newsletter editor for a few reasons. E.g. he sometimes misuses words such as "traditional" when he means "conventional"--as in traditional [Chinese, Ayurvedic, Herbal etc] medicine versus conventional, mainstream, orthadox, western medicine.  [In addition to your comment re repetition] 

Obviously, I continue to read the newsletter.  AND I wish that Dr Mercola were more open to caring suggestions.  Holistically, Dr Tom  in CT.


 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.