<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Vital Votes Health Blog - Natural Health Articles by Dr. Mercola</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Debug Build: 31106.3070)</generator><item><title>How Has Healthcare Been Reduced to Buyer Beware?</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/16/how-has-healthcare-been-reduced-to-buyer-beware.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 06:00:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:464445</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Mercola</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=464445</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/16/how-has-healthcare-been-reduced-to-buyer-beware.aspx#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>It’s a disgusting, dishonorable way to generate sales, but it works: according to AlterNet, in the U.S. every $1000 that a drug company spends on direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising produces 24 new patients. It’s a bonanza that generates seven times more customers than if the companies didn’t advertise. Vioxx―Merck’s failed drug that caused 140,000 cardiac events and deaths before it was pulled from the market―was sold this way.</p>
<p>Merck admits that Vioxx was never intended for the general public. Yet Merck advertised it, and people saw the ads and started demanding it from their doctors, and Merck sold 20 million prescriptions―and some people died before Merck pulled both the ads and the drug. But Merck isn’t alone in this; direct-to-consumer marketing is a general practice by almost every drug company in America. </p>
<p>The problem is that, like Vioxx, some of the drugs being advertised are not what they appear, meaning if you see it advertised, the old axiom, caveat emptor―let the buyer beware―is something to remember.</p><img src="http://blogs.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=464445" width="1" height="1">]]></description></item><item><title>Can You Call a 9-Year-Old a Psychopath?</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/16/can-you-call-a-9yearold-a-psychopath.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 06:00:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:464459</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Mercola</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=464459</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/16/can-you-call-a-9yearold-a-psychopath.aspx#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>For the past 10 years a researcher at Florida International University has been studying a group of children who he believes exhibit social, behavioral and emotional signs of becoming psychopaths as adults. The conduct disorders that can put children in this classification can vary from subtle problems like lying to more serious problems like callousness and lack of emotion, to predatory conduct, aggressive disobedience, and outright dangerous behaviors. &nbsp;</p>
<p>While some psychologists argue that it’s not ethical to brand a child a psychopath before he has a chance to grow and mature, others argue that ignoring the problems could make it even worse. Some are also hinting that the problems are neurological, like autism or diabetes in that it’s not something that can be “cured,” even with early intervention and treatment.</p><img src="http://blogs.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=464459" width="1" height="1">]]></description></item><item><title>Whooping Cough Epidemic Alarms Washington State</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/16/whooping-cough-epidemic-alarms-washington-state.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 06:00:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:464470</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Mercola</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=464470</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/16/whooping-cough-epidemic-alarms-washington-state.aspx#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>A whooping cough (pertussis) outbreak in the state of Washington has health officials up in arms and blaming unvaccinated children for what they are calling an epidemic of record proportions. While the numbers aren’t truly accurate since the state’s top medical officer instructed physicians to stop testing for pertussis and simply treat cases on an assumption of pertussis, the age group that seems stricken most is between 8 and 12 years old.</p>
<p>This is the same age group that has had the most cases across the country, and mostly in fully vaccinated children. The nationwide outbreak has led epidemiologists at the CDC to conclude that the whooping cough vaccine wears off a few years after it’s given.</p><img src="http://blogs.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=464470" width="1" height="1">]]></description></item><item><title>Why Is U.S. Congress More Concerned with Protecting Profits than Kids’ Health?</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/16/why-is-us-congress-more-concerned-with-protecting-profits-than-kids_1920_-health.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 06:00:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:464480</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Mercola</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=464480</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/16/why-is-us-congress-more-concerned-with-protecting-profits-than-kids_1920_-health.aspx#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>If you thought the federal government was really going to do something about childhood obesity in America, all it takes to change your mind is to follow the corporate money trail to Congress. In a new report by the Sunlight Foundation Reporting Group, researchers found that federal marketing guidelines were stopped in their tracks by money thrown at politicians charged with making the change happen. </p>
<p>According to AlterNet, the lengths to which corporate America will go to protect their profits includes campaign donations, attacking science, asserting constitutional rights, and threatening federal agencies with smear campaigns. The results were that nearly 200 lawmakers buckled on the guidelines and ignored the nationwide health epidemic affecting millions of children and teenagers.</p>
<p>What it proves is just how much of Washington is ingrained in protecting profits, as opposed to standing up for the public interest, AlterNet said.</p><img src="http://blogs.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=464480" width="1" height="1">]]></description></item><item><title> Sippy Cups and Other Little-Known Childhood Hazards</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/16/sippy-cups-and-other-littleknown-childhood-hazards.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 06:00:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:464500</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Mercola</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=464500</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/16/sippy-cups-and-other-littleknown-childhood-hazards.aspx#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes even the most benign things can cause a whole lot of harm for children. In the latest list of items that can cause unexpected injuries to little ones younger than 3, sippy cups, baby bottles and pacifers have been found guilty. According to the Center for Injury Research and Policy, 45,000 children younger than 3 years old were treated in emergency rooms between 1991 and 2010 for injuries related to these items.</p>
<p>A majority of the injuries involved 1-year-olds with bottles as the most common culprit. Injuries tended to occur at home, and resulted in cuts to the mouth and face, usually when children were running or walking, The New York Times reports. Other dangerous items are button batteries, which can be swallowed.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p><img src="http://blogs.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=464500" width="1" height="1">]]></description></item><item><title>Breast Cancer Misdiagnosis Much Higher than Previously Thought</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/15/breast-cancer-misdiagnosis-much-higher-than-previously-thought.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 06:00:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:464200</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Mercola</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=464200</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/15/breast-cancer-misdiagnosis-much-higher-than-previously-thought.aspx#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[The “C” word. Probably the most feared word there is in healthcare, just the mere mention of cancer conjures up images of death and despair. That’s why we have cancer screenings like mammograms. But what if the very test women trust to save them from cancer also causes them to be overdiagnosed, and ultimately treated for something that may never have given them any trouble at all? The idea is appalling, but it’s true. <br />
<br />
According to a study in Norway, as many as 1 in 4 women are consistently overdiagnosed with breast cancer that, if left alone, would never have caused them any harm. The numbers are alarming enough, but researchers said U.S. overdiagnosis rates are probably even higher. The problem, according to CNN, is related to advances in technology. As mammograms “see” tinier and tinier spots in a woman’s films, the possibility of the women being overtreated increases exponentially, when overzealous clinicians insist that more tests, including invasive MRIs with dye and painful biopsies, be done on women who have the misfortune of having a tiny spot in their X-ray.
<p>The idea of overdiagnosis is exacerbated by studies showing that the very tests designed to rule out cancer can actually CAUSE cancer to grow from the inflammation and bruising that occur as a result of the surgery. Concerns about overdiagnosis in both breast and prostate cancer have been increasing over the years. In 2009, NBC New York interviewed Dr. H. Gilbert Welch, an expert in cancer screening, who said:</p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.5in;"><em>“Screening for cancer means that tens of thousands of patients who never would have become sick are diagnosed with this disease. Once they’re diagnosed, almost everybody gets treated―and we know that treatment can cause harm.” </em></p><img src="http://blogs.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=464200" width="1" height="1">]]></description></item><item><title>FDA Approves HIV Prevention Drug</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/15/fda-approves-hiv-prevention-drug.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 06:00:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:464211</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Mercola</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=464211</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/15/fda-approves-hiv-prevention-drug.aspx#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>A drug that’s already being used as a treatment for AIDS has been approved by the FDA as a preventive pill for use with people who have no infection at all―a move that AIDS activists say is the wrong thing to do. According to CNN, more than 40 health professionals, AIDS advocates and patients implored the FDA committee not to recommend the drug for the new indication.</p>
<p>But the committee ignored their pleas and did it anyway. The FDA doesn’t have to follow the recommendations of its advisory committees, but it often does. The drug, Truvada, is manufactured by Gilead Sciences Inc. It’s not cheap―a month’s supply costs about $1200. The committee’s approval gives Gilead a whole, new, wide-open market for selling the drug.</p><img src="http://blogs.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=464211" width="1" height="1">]]></description></item><item><title>How Corporations Like Monsanto Have Hijacked Higher Education</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/15/how-corporations-like-monsanto-have-hijacked-higher-education.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 06:00:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:464230</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Mercola</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=464230</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/15/how-corporations-like-monsanto-have-hijacked-higher-education.aspx#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>In another example of “follow the money,” a new report by Food and Water Watch has found that a quarter of research funding at land grant universities comes from corporations, giving big companies like Monsanto a stronger foothold than ever in higher education. According to AlterNet, $7.4 billion flowed from big corporations to agricultural research in 2006―an astounding amount that’s compounded by the fact that, in 2005, a third of agricultural scientists also reported consulting for private industry.</p>
<p>In the most egregious cases, corporate boards and college leadership overlap; in 2009, for example, South Dakota State’s president joined Monsanto’s board of directors. While some people might say it shouldn’t matter whose board a college president sits on, the implications are huge because corporate funding can influence the results of supposedly “scientific” studies done at the respective universities. A perfect example, AlterNet said, is what happened with a team of researchers at the University of Illinois who were funded by a statewide fertilizer “checkoff” after they published work on how fertilizer affects organic matter in the soil.</p><img src="http://blogs.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=464230" width="1" height="1">]]></description></item><item><title>The Propaganda Supporting Fluoride and Why They Are Lies</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/15/the-propaganda-supporting-fluoride-and-why-they-are-lies.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 06:00:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:464251</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Mercola</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=464251</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/15/the-propaganda-supporting-fluoride-and-why-they-are-lies.aspx#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1ANZHnxOMxk?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&start=40"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1ANZHnxOMxk?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&start=40" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><p>The fluoridation debate on the dangers of fluoride has been ongoing for more than six decades. Study after study shows that fluoride is a dangerous, toxic poison. Yet, even while it’s being dumped every day into municipal water systems, health officials that should know better are flooding the media with lies and propaganda singing the praises of fluoridation. </p>
<p>The CDC calls fluoridation one of the public health achievements of the 20<sup>th</sup> century. Yet nothing could be further from the truth. The information for this quote comes from 1999 issues of Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), which includes fluoridation in a list of “Ten Great Public Health Achievements―1900-1999.” But what most members of the public don’t realize is that the early fluoridation reports were written by people with conflicts of interest and no experience in scientific methods or studies. </p>
<p>This, and other important investigative facts are included in this short video, which exposes&nbsp; the zealous fluoridation promoters, their hidden agenda, and the harms that have come to people who have no choice in whether fluoride is added to their drinking water.</p><img src="http://blogs.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=464251" width="1" height="1">]]></description></item><item><title>Why Is Whole Foods Outsourcing Many of Its Organic Foods from China?</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/15/why-is-whole-foods-outsourcing-many-of-its-organic-foods-from-china.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 06:00:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:464260</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Mercola</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=464260</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/15/why-is-whole-foods-outsourcing-many-of-its-organic-foods-from-china.aspx#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Across the country people who want natural, organic food choices have long considered Whole Foods Market as the place to go for their shopping needs. Indeed, Whole Foods has cashed in on these consumers’ needs by branding itself as “the world’s largest retailer of natural and organic foods.” Unfortunately, Whole Foods hasn’t been wholly honest when it comes to how “organic” some of their products really are. </p>
<p>According to an ABC 7-TV investigation, Whole Foods is selling products grown in China, where no one’s verifying whether the products meet U.S. organic standards. It’s common knowledge that at least 10 percent of China’s groundwater is contaminated with deadly chemicals, and that the country overuses pesticides contaminate both land and water. It’s also no secret that food scandals are rampant in China.</p>
<p>And this is troublesome since Whole Foods simply trusts a Chinese third party to say the foods the company is importing are certified organic. </p><img src="http://blogs.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=464260" width="1" height="1">]]></description></item><item><title>Signs that China Is Rearing to Become the Next GMO Superpower</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/14/signs-that-china-is-rearing-to-become-the-next-gmo-superpower.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 06:00:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:463886</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Mercola</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=463886</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/14/signs-that-china-is-rearing-to-become-the-next-gmo-superpower.aspx#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>A recent study published by BMC Public Health indicates that China could be on the edge of becoming the next GMO superpower. The study looked at newspaper coverage of GM topics published between January 2002 and August 2011 in two major Chinese newspapers. Roughly half the articles were largely supportive of GM technology, with the other half neutral. No articles expressed negative tones in regards to GMOs, demonstrating that the Chinese print media is largely supportive of GMOs.</p>
The newspapers also described the Chinese government as “actively pursuing GMO research and development programs.” One of the newspapers even wrote that public concerns about GM rice were “fallacious” and based on “the public’s ignorance about biotechnology and the loss of confidence in government authority.” The study’s authors concluded that the media, scientists and the government should work together to ensure that science communication is accurate and balanced.<img src="http://blogs.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=463886" width="1" height="1">]]></description></item><item><title>Is China Changing Its Mind about  Becoming the Next GMO Superpower?</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/14/is-china-changing-its-mind-about--becoming-the-next-gmo-superpower.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 06:00:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:463890</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Mercola</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=463890</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/14/is-china-changing-its-mind-about--becoming-the-next-gmo-superpower.aspx#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>A recent study published by BMC Public Health indicates that China is on the edge of becoming the next GMO superpower, with genetically-modified crops widely accepted and promoted, but it's possible the Chinese government may be changing its mind on GMOs. The study looked at newspaper coverage of GM topics published between January 2002 and August 2011 in two major Chinese newspapers. Roughly half the articles were largely supportive of GM technology, with the other half neutral. No articles expressed negative tones in regards to GMOs, demonstrating that the Chinese print media is largely supportive of GMOs.<br />
<br />
The newspapers also described the Chinese government as “actively pursuing GMO research and development programs.” One of the newspapers even wrote that public concerns about GM rice were “fallacious” and based on “the public’s ignorance about biotechnology and the loss of confidence in government authority.” The study’s authors concluded that the media, scientists and the government should work together to ensure that science communication is accurate and balanced—an opinion that Chinese media probably need to take heed of, seeing that their government drafted a plan February 21, 2012 that outlaws genetically modified grains. <br />
<br />
The Chinese government’s decision followed the European Union’s announcement in November that EU was requiring all Chinese rice to be certified 100 percent GM-free.</p><img src="http://blogs.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=463890" width="1" height="1">]]></description></item><item><title>Tasty Weight Loss Surgery Alternative</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/14/tasty-weight-loss-surgery-alternative.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 06:00:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:463907</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Mercola</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=463907</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/14/tasty-weight-loss-surgery-alternative.aspx#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>A new discovery on strategies to reduce visceral fat in the body not only eliminates the need for weight loss surgery, but may be one of the tastiest ways ever found to do it. Researchers looking for an alternative to bariatrical surgery for obese persons say that capsaisin, an ingredient found in hot chili peppers and used to make hot sauce, is nearly as effective as a surgery called vagotomy. The study, published recently in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, showed that using the capsaicin for the procedure rather than invasive surgery could be an effective, safe way to help achieve weight loss and reduce the risk of obesity-related diseases with fewer side effects.</p><img src="http://blogs.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=463907" width="1" height="1">]]></description></item><item><title>Have Human Hormones Been Eclipsed by Synthetic Ones?</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/14/have-human-hormones-been-eclipsed-by-synthetic-ones.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 06:00:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:463926</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Mercola</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=463926</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/14/have-human-hormones-been-eclipsed-by-synthetic-ones.aspx#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Scientists measuring paraben levels in human breast tissue are asking some disturbing questions about the dangers of common hormone-mimicking preservatives found in thousands of consumer products. Using samples collected from mastectomies of women with primary breast cancer, the report revealed three things:</p>
<ol>
    <li>The ester form of parabens in the breast tissue indicated it had gotten there dermally, possibly from products like skin care products and underarm deodorants.</li>
    <li>The paraben residues were found at concentrations up to 1 million times higher than the estrogen levels found naturally in human breast tissue.</li>
    <li>Propylparaben was found in the highest concentration in the underarm area (axilla), where underarm deodorants are most used and breast cancer prevalence is at its highest.</li>
</ol>
<p>Scientists said additional exposure sources such as other cosmetics were also implicated in the study, since some of the women whose tissue was examined reported having never used deodorants.</p><img src="http://blogs.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=463926" width="1" height="1">]]></description></item><item><title>The Biggest Lies Toxic Chemical Companies Tell Us</title><link>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/14/the-biggest-lies-toxic-chemical-companies-tell-us.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 06:00:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:463940</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Mercola</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=463940</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/05/14/the-biggest-lies-toxic-chemical-companies-tell-us.aspx#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>How far will companies go to ensure they continue making money on products that make you sick? Answer: No extreme is too extreme, including bald-faced lying if it means keeping the bucks rolling in. One of the biggest lies toxic chemical companies have told so far include the story of a baby dying in agony in a fire. The only thing is the baby didn’t die―in fact, it never existed. The Chicago Tribune learned this recently when it wanted to know more about a 7-week-old baby who a burn doctor testified as having died in agony because she was on a pillow that lacked flame retardants.</p>
<p>It turns out other tiny patients the doctor had described in testimony supporting toxic flame retardant materials didn’t exist either.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Another flaming example of a corporate giant that gets caught lying again and again is Monsanto which, in 2009, was found guilty by France’s highest court of false advertising for claims that its toxic weed killer Roundup is biodegradable and leaves “the soil clean.” The French court noted that Roundup’s main ingredient, glyphosate, is dangerous for the environment and toxic for aquatic organisms. But that's just one example of the lies Monsanto tells to keep on selling its products; this company has a long history of fraudulent statements about the safety of Roundup.</p><img src="http://blogs.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=463940" width="1" height="1">]]></description></item></channel></rss>
