Split Decision in Latest Vioxx Trials

How long a patient used Vioxx may become the legal litmus test among state and federal juries making decisions on the health-harming effect of the still-banned COX-2 inhibitor in some 9,600 lawsuits (and counting) in the U.S. court system.

A New Jersey state court awarded John McDarby and his wife $4.5 million, but Thomas Cona only $45. Why the huge difference? McDarby took Vioxx for four years before suffering a heart attack that resulted also in a broken hip, leaving him wheelchair-bound.

On the other hand, Cona claimed he used Vioxx for nearly two years, but his medical records showed the duration to be only seven months. Here's the rub: Cona says he used free samples to fill out the remainder of his two years on Vioxx.

One of the very few benefits of these court proceedings: More people are getting a first-hand look at the greed on display by the mega-pharmaceuticals that hastily rush toxic drugs like Vioxx to market solely to fatten their pocketbooks at the expense of your health.

MSNBC April 6, 2006

Washington Post April 6, 2006

Click Here and be the first to comment on this article
Post your comment