<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://blogs.mercola.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /><title>Study: No Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection From Surfaces or Objects</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2020/07/30/study-no-risk-of-sarscov2-infection-from-surfaces-or-objects.aspx</link><description>In a study published in the August 2020 edition of The Lancet a researcher reports that, in real life situations, he found &amp;ldquo;no viable SARS-CoV-2 detected on surfaces.&amp;rdquo; Earlier studies claimed the virus could be found as many six days after</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Debug Build: 31106.3070)</generator></channel></rss>