<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://blogs.mercola.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /><title>Experts Question Use of Repeated COVID-19 Tests</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2020/09/22/experts-question-use-of-repeated-covid19-tests.aspx</link><description>While the world talks about the casualties of COVID-19 &amp;mdash; all the people who have died so far &amp;mdash; one casualty that isn&amp;rsquo;t getting enough attention, or only sporadic notice at most, is the fact that false-positives to the COVID tests are</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Debug Build: 31106.3070)</generator><item><title>re: Experts Question Use of Repeated COVID-19 Tests</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2020/09/22/experts-question-use-of-repeated-covid19-tests.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#1028221</link><pubDate>9/23/2020 7:28:16 AM</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:1028221</guid><dc:creator>johnottw</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Just some extremely simple maths highlights the problem. Let’s start with 2 assumptions but you chan change both to fit your circumstances. So let’s assume 1 in 1000 people at any one time have the virus. Around the rate in the U.K. over the summer. And now assume the tests have a false positive rate of 1%. And we all know that would be a very favourable assumption. Some estimates I have seen say false positives could be over 20%. But we’ll assume only 1%. So test 1000 people and the tests will pick up the 1 person who has the virus but another 10 people who give false positives. The result, only 1 of the 11 positives is a real positive. Or put another way , if you test positive there is only a 9% chance you actually do have the virus. Now go home and self isolate like a good citizen.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Experts Question Use of Repeated COVID-19 Tests</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2020/09/22/experts-question-use-of-repeated-covid19-tests.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#1028162</link><pubDate>9/23/2020 1:11:04 AM</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:1028162</guid><dc:creator>pie2634</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Medical tyranny. The test by the way does not work but they do not care since the objective of the eugenists is to force vaccinate you and transform the world in a huge medical tyranny where you own body does not belong to you but to the state and big pharma. It started the SAME way in Germany in the 30s and USA 20s. In the name of racisl hygiene at the time, the virus does what the Waffen SS did directly. So you will be forced to take tests that dont work and based on their 50% false positives, quarantined,  sent to a hospital camp and forced vaccinated with a dangerous expirimental vaccine contraining dangerous RNA vaccines and then tracked and traced 24 hours a day 365 fays per year. And like your domestic cat and dog forced to obtain a vaccine passport. We are not dealing with free human beings. People like Gates are demonic in nature. I hate speaking in a religious way but it all comes to Georgia Guidestones and anglo saxon social darwinlism, Maltus and the likes of Sir Thomas. Galton. Evil anglo saxon eugenism runs USA, UK, Europe and China, &amp;nbsp;The head of the Beast runs USA and the UN.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>