Study Shows Surgical Masks Not Protective Against Bacterial, Viral Infections

Study Shows Surgical Masks Not Protective Against Bacterial, Viral Infectionshttps://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2020/10/05/study-shows-surgical-masks-not-protective-against-bacterial-viral-infections.aspxA 3M technical bulletin released in early June reports that surgical masks are not the way to go if you want the best protection from bioaerosols including SARS-CoV-2. No matter which contaminant you’re fighting — coronavirus or tuberculosisenCommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Debug Build: 31106.3070)re: Study Shows Surgical Masks Not Protective Against Bacterial, Viral Infectionshttps://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2020/10/05/study-shows-surgical-masks-not-protective-against-bacterial-viral-infections.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#103036110/6/2020 7:59:57 AM24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:1030361Randyfast<p>Why is this news? I see people on transit with their little masks on and quite often, I can actually see their nose and mouth through the open side of the mask. What a total FARCE!</p>