<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://blogs.mercola.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /><title>Journals Are Afraid to Publish Negative Mask Study</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2020/10/19/journals-are-afraid-to-publish-negative-mask-study.aspx</link><description>A long Twitter thread discussing a Danish face mask study that concludes that compulsory mask-wearing may do more harm than good is asking why the study hasn&amp;rsquo;t been published in major medical journals yet. Translated, the study says that tens of</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Debug Build: 31106.3070)</generator><item><title>re: Journals Are Afraid to Publish Negative Mask Study</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2020/10/19/journals-are-afraid-to-publish-negative-mask-study.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#1033359</link><pubDate>10/20/2020 10:30:27 AM</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:1033359</guid><dc:creator>tireguy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Censorship courtesy of the medical and pharmaceutical mafia.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>