Expert Discusses Potentially Unpleasant COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

re: Expert Discusses Potentially Unpleasant COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

Commoncents — 11/25/2020 6:37:31 AM

First of all Health Care Workers are all offered health insurance. Whether they choose it, or not is their risk. Hospitals are only gaining with covid. They receive money money for covid patients, and if they are on a ventilator, even more. If you follow real science, you know, this is a flu. Where are the 2020 statistics on the yearly flu. And pneumonia rates??

re: Expert Discusses Potentially Unpleasant COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

spoodle22 — 11/23/2020 2:05:44 PM

there is no valid information about the covid-19 vaccine which, as i understand it, kills less than the common flu which kills 650,000 a year. That is the proof this is a fake pandemic and the vaccines are part of a Bill Gates Eugenics project to save the earth from all the useless eaters. If the flu vaccine doesn't work, why are we forced to pay for this bogus vaccine that anyone with a keen sense of the obvious will refuse. I would never take it, i would slit my throat first. It is likely to have side effects worse than covid, My relatives and friends had covid, it was like the flu, they are better now like Trump and Melania.

re: Expert Discusses Potentially Unpleasant COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

spoodle22 — 11/23/2020 1:41:51 PM

the vaccine is an IQ test....a way to eliminate low IQ's. Ashitler would do.

re: Expert Discusses Potentially Unpleasant COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

Randyfast — 11/23/2020 7:14:43 AM

ANYONE who willingly takes ANY of the covid vaccines, needs to have their head examined! There will, no doubt, be disastrous effects, down the road. What if they put nanobots into your system with the vaccine, to prep the masses for the era of Transhumanism? Speculation, Conspiracy Theory, Science Fiction? We're already living in the Twilight Zone. I wouldn't discount anything.

re: Expert Discusses Potentially Unpleasant COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

compos_mentis — 11/23/2020 6:45:42 AM

Censored by Mercola?? I submitted my comment on the financial links between the UK's MHRA Regulator, now busy assessing vaccine safety, and the same pharmaceutical companies it is supposed to be regulating, as I felt this to be an item of public interest. Puzzled that 'Admin' did not publish - I do hope this isn't a sign of Gate's fact checking, in view of his financial links to the same 'independent' Regulator?

re: Expert Discusses Potentially Unpleasant COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

CMT367 — 11/23/2020 6:30:32 AM

Anyone here know somebody who tested positive for "covid antibodies" yet was never sick (aside from their usual fatigue, that is)?

re: Expert Discusses Potentially Unpleasant COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

pie2634 — 11/23/2020 5:40:59 AM

Dark humor. One of the main unpleasant side effects of taking the Covid 19 vaccines will be premature DEATH. Welcome to Covid Orwellian Huxley like tyranny. If you are feeling more and more like a farm animal and a domestic pet, its that you still have a human brain left. I do not recommend having your DNA screwed up with an mRNA adeno virus. Uncontrolled immune inflammatory risk ? Nice. It means in sum nice things like CANCER. Remember here. Bill Gates and his United Nations gang are all obsessed with population control. Indeed like in a dystopian science fiction novel, except this time its for real not an Aldous Huxley, George Orwell novel.

re: Expert Discusses Potentially Unpleasant COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

PIGabbattoir — 11/22/2020 1:49:11 PM

Of the thousands that have died "with" Covid. I would be interested to know how many were taking prescription drugs for underlying conditions, and which prescription drugs were a common factor. If the good Dr Mercola or any of his associates are able to provide such details, I`m sure it would make for very interesting reading.

re: Expert Discusses Potentially Unpleasant COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

tireguy — 11/22/2020 1:23:25 PM

I have posted this before, but it bears repeating. Comments by Simon on 11-10-2020 concerning Pfizer’s announcement on Dr. Malcom Kendrick’s Blog https://drmalcolmkendrick.org : (Showing how he calculated the absolute risk reduction.) Looking forward to Dr Kendrick’s next blog post, which has to be on the just announced Pfizer covid-19 vaccine, or rather the wonderful example of “doctoring data” behind it The Media headlines scream “90% effective!!!!” yet… * 43,538 participants * 94 confirmed covid-19 cases so “90% effective” is maybe 85 in the placebo group and 9 in the vaccine group now for the real-world absolute differences using those estimated numbers above: * 99.61% chance of not testing +ve for covid-19 in the placebo group * 99.96% chance of not testing +ve for covid-19 in the vaccine group * therefore an absolute difference of only 0.35%

So I calculated another figure called the number needed to treat from the absolute risk reduction: The reported efficacy of the Pfizer vaccine is 90%. This is normally called relative risk reduction, basically statistical trickery. What is needed is the absolute risk reduction, which is based on the actual number of those infected in both the treatment group and the placebo group, which is the above 0.35% absolute risk reduction. From this we can calculate the NNT, number needed to treat to prevent one case of the disease, and that is 286. Meaning 286 people need to be vaccinated to prevent one case of the disease. The vaccine is absolutely worthless to prevent the disease, but that is the plan from the beginning to only make the infection more mild. It will not stop infections, nor infection transmissions, nor hospitalizations, nor deaths. This is a massive fraud.

re: Expert Discusses Potentially Unpleasant COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

flowercrafter — 11/22/2020 12:44:09 PM

As it stands now in one of the trials, only 90 out of about 15,000 vaccine participants that received the placebo, contracted Covid (vs. 5 out the 15,000 that received the real vaccine.) 14,910/15,000 means the placebo is 99.4% effective! If their press release can manipulate the statistics, so can I. I'll take the placebo with zero side effects, thank you very much. But it makes me think, is there a possibility that a large number of trial participants won't get the virus on both sides? They didn't test for t-cell immunity at all. They also didn't tell us how many were asymptomatic or if they were taking in account of the inaccuracy of the PCR test. I'm so tired of the media fawning over these results.

re: Expert Discusses Potentially Unpleasant COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

Kitera — 11/22/2020 10:04:16 AM

The vaccine is absolutely safe - well -safe for the bottom line of the companies producing the vaccine - for the individuals taking it - not so much

re: Expert Discusses Potentially Unpleasant COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

compos_mentis — 11/22/2020 8:18:28 AM

Here in the UK, we are told to trust, without question, the judgement of the 'independent' MHRA (broadly our equivalent of the FDA) who are doubtless about to wave through the Pfizer experimental jab, as 'perfectly safe' for injection first into the very elderly and most vulnerable souls in care homes.

I did a little digging into how 'independent' this MHRA really is, and my findings, when taken in the context of true patient safety, are alarming! The Agency was hived off from the Health Department in 2003, under the Tony Blair premiership, and, in the words of the late Dr. Andrew Herxheimer 'the culture became confirmed that the industry is the client and the client must be looked after: quick service, good service, easy contact, etc - so it is a closed community in a sense'. Hardly surprising, since the Agency's work is, I understand, funded by the very industry it is supposed to be 'regulating' i.e. fees collected from Big Pharma, plus the generosity of 'research grants' from likes of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

The 'revolving doors' background of Ian Hudson, (ex-VP, R&D, SmithKline Beecham) who served as CEO of the MHRA until September, 2019, is particularly interesting, since he then left the MHRA to become Senior Adviser, Integrated Development ..... with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation!!

Does anyone share my misgivings about entrusting patient safety to this regulatory process?

re: Expert Discusses Potentially Unpleasant COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

ursulariches — 11/22/2020 8:02:55 AM

How STUPID to get the vaccine when you can get mild Covid instead which is milder than the vaccine? A study claims in the UK that 20% of victims got covid from going to the supermarket. If I walk around the supermarkets every day, briefly passing by someone who is infected with covid, I might just get a mild bout. Then I will be immune and not have to be concerned about covid. With the Vit- D, Vit- C, Zinc plus the quercetin, and with just briefly passing, hopefully an infected person, then I am out through the other side of the tunnel.

re: Expert Discusses Potentially Unpleasant COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

BillBradyKdy76 — 11/22/2020 3:25:00 AM

Sorry, but if you’re stupid enough to take that vaccine then all hope is lost for your freedoms. But it seems that folks are champing at the bit for the worlds first mRNA based vaccine - untested. Good luck.

re: Expert Discusses Potentially Unpleasant COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

Ronald_H — 11/22/2020 2:43:31 AM

What will we know of the harm of these new vaccines ten and twenty years from now? Can "experts" tell us that?

I've watched over the decades of lots things that are pronounced "safe" and used by millions and then taken off the market for being dangerous except for vaccines and not because they aren't dangerous, but because the companies have immunity to law suits and the results of things that go wrong are hidden. I trust foods and things in nature that have been consumed by man for thousands of years. I don't trust pharmaceuticals nor man-made chemicals that have never existed in nature. But, I'm fortunate to not need any of that because my health is amazing.