England’s Medical Officer Says COVID Vaccine Could Save 99% of Deaths

re: England’s Medical Officer Says COVID Vaccine Could Save 99% of Deaths

tireguy — 12/5/2020 10:57:40 AM

There are many natural methods to boost the immune system to prevent the damaging effects of infection by SARS-CoV2 and if these were promoted as strongly as the vaccine, almost all the deaths from COVID19 would have been prevented. However, there is no money in these immune boosting methods and it doesn’t comply with the obedience training.

re: England’s Medical Officer Says COVID-19 Could Save 99% of Deaths

compos_mentis — 12/4/2020 6:46:05 AM

,,, (continuation) My concern does not arise because I have negative views about vaccines (I don’t), Instead, it’s the very principle that politicians seem ready to waive that new medical interventions at this, incomplete state of development- should not be made available to subjects on anything other than an explicitly experimental basis. That’s my concern. And the reason for that concern is that it is not known what the safety profile will be, six months or a year or longer after dosing. You have literally no data on this & neither does nyone else. It isn’t that I’m saying that unacceptable adverse effects will emerge after longer intervals after dosing. No: it is that you have no idea what will happen yet, despite this, you’ll be creating the impression that you do.

Several of the vaccine candidates utilise novel technology which have not previously been used to create vaccines. There is therefore no long term safety data which can be pointed to in support of the notion that it’s reasonable to expedite development & to waive absent safety information on this occasion. I am suspicious of the motives of those proposing expedited use in the wider human population. We now understand who is at particularly elevated risk of morbidity & mortality from acquiring this virus. Volunteers from these groups only should be provided detailed information about risk / benefit, including the sole point I make here. Only if informed consent is given should any EXPERIMENTAL vaccine be used. I don’t trust you. You’ve not been straightforward & have behaved appallingly throughout this crisis.

You’re still doing it now, misleading about infection risk from young children. Why should I believe you in relation to experimental vaccines? Dr. Michael Yeadon Is it any wonder, Professor Van Tam, that I have lost all confidence in the NHS?

re: England’s Medical Officer Says COVID-19 Could Save 99% of Deaths

compos_mentis — 12/4/2020 6:44:34 AM

I was so disturbed by this 'expert' pronouncing that he would willingly push his elderly mother to the front of the queue as a guinea pig, that I found his personal email, and wrote to him on November 20, with proof of delivery - He hasn't had the guts to reply!! Dear Professor Van Tam, With respect, I find your blasé attitude to the legitimate safety concerns about as yet unknown adverse effects of the Pfizer mRna vaccine alarming, given the past history of disastrous 'rushed through' supposedly 'safe' medicines. Presumably, you would dismiss the opinion of Former Pfizer Vice-President Dr. Michael Yeadon as 'misinformed' despite his eminent qualifications??

So distressed by the way the UK government has pandered to the vaccine lobby on this key issue, Professor Yeadon wrote an open letter to Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care of United Kingdom, who has ordered his department to publish the proposed changes to the Human Medicine Regulations “to cover a potential roll-out of a vaccine”. Dr Yeadon’s letter to the UK Health Minister reads: “Dear Mr. Hancock, I have a degree in Biochemistry & Toxicology & a research based PhD in pharmacology. I have spent 32 years working in pharmaceutical R&D, mostly in new medicines for disorders of lung & skin.

I was a VP at Pfizer & CEO of a biotech I founded (Ziarco – acquired by Novartis). I’m knowledgeable about new medicine R&D. I have read the consultation document. I’ve rarely been as shocked & upset. All vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel. No candidate vaccine has been in development for more than a few months. If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent. This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information..... (continued in second posting)

re: England’s Medical Officer Says COVID-19 Could Save 99% of Deaths

oreo952 — 12/4/2020 5:54:22 AM

The elderly have been targeted right from the beginning. People were brainwashed into believing they were the most vulnerable and now they are targeted to be the first to get this vaccine. This is a genocide.

re: England’s Medical Officer Says COVID-19 Could Save 99% of Deaths

emi26062 — 12/4/2020 4:34:49 AM

I saw in my diabetic father a change in glycated hemoglobin out of nowhere, without further complaints. My husband suddenly has high blood glucose and ferritin, he has done rt pcr 4 times, all negative. I had the perception of having had a viral condition twice, with different symptoms: the first time with diarrhea, neck pain, otalgia, headache for more than one month. With an interval of two months I had a fever. As I am ENT, I attended many positive covid patients during this period. But what caught my attention was that from the beginning I presented foot injuries called dysidrosis and a psoriatic lesion started a month ago. I already read that physicians are facing autoimmune changes in patients after covid. I fear that in an individual already inflamed by any issues or even if he had already the disease, taking the vaccine may further irritate the immune system.

re: England’s Medical Officer Says COVID-19 Could Save 99% of Deaths

mourningwarbler — 12/3/2020 9:16:45 PM

... presuming there will be more deaths?

re: England’s Medical Officer Says COVID-19 Could Save 99% of Deaths

Randyfast — 12/3/2020 5:06:31 PM

So... the elderly in the "care" homes; who are at the end of their life anyway, won't die, as long as they fall for the big "Safe and Effective" lie. That is so amazing! These criminals are DEMONS! Let's all hear it for Eugenics! P.S. Sorry...correction; they don't have to "fall" for anything - vaccines are mandatory in care homes!

re: England’s Medical Officer Says COVID-19 Could Save 99% of Deaths

DannyBoy62 — 12/3/2020 1:55:57 PM

“They” say a lot of things, don’t they?