Vaccine Passports Spell ‘the End of Humanity’

re: Vaccine Passports Spell ‘the End of Humanity’

mymercola111 — 4/10/2021 3:55:49 PM

l.facebook.com/l.php

re: Vaccine Passports Spell ‘the End of Humanity’

sundisue — 4/8/2021 1:23:14 PM

I really wonder why the lead-in to this article calls Naomi Wolf "liberal author and feminist" ... wasn't she part of the Clinton administration? Isn't she a best-selling author? Isn't she an independent journalist? I take issue with the first sentence as it attempts to set up a bias among "new" readers that portrays Naomi Wolf as someone with a political agenda.

re: Vaccine Passports Spell ‘the End of Humanity’

Cabochon — 4/8/2021 2:35:51 AM

Just another example of doublethink aka cognitive dissonance that is symptomatic of the totalitarian mindset. All the nonsense about data protection while allowing personal data theft by big Tech, the Data Protection Act which is supposed to offer legal redress and protect your privacy which presumably includes your medical history is just a load of hogwash if a vaccine “passport” is created so that any airline official, nosey bureaucrat or shop assistant can scrutinise my personal information. I already have a travel passport which reveals my identity - that is all that an airline is required to know about me. The real agenda is blatantly obvious and as there is no emergency, no pandemic and no threat to the majority from a variant of influenza, governments requiring vaccine passports are in breach of freedom of movement, civil and human rights, the Data Protection Act and hopefully will be slung out at the next election - assuming of course that the next election will be genuine and voting counts not fraudulently corrupted as well.

re: Vaccine Passports Spell ‘the End of Humanity’

goo9593 — 4/7/2021 2:26:27 PM

Headlines like "the end of humanity" do a disservice to the message of the article. vaccine passports would mean an end tp personal privacy and I think more people would understand that message rather than the hyperbole. But this is no small issue. And it's first being pushed by private companies rather than the government. A private business can put more requirements on employees and their customers than the government can. But when that private company is an airline it makes little difference. This is definitely a measure that must be fought in the courts. At let there doctors will have to defend this madness under oath and their conflicts of interest will be exposed.