What Does a ‘Zero’ COVID Goal Really Mean?

re: What Does a ‘Zero’ COVID Goal Really Mean?

JoeFrog — 5/31/2021 11:26:27 AM

Zero covid means no more fallacious PCR tests. No more tests misdiagnosing "covid," no more "covid." Pretty simple.

re: What Does a ‘Zero’ COVID Goal Really Mean?

Almond — 5/31/2021 5:15:32 AM

Pandora's box has already been opened. The best protection is now for good individual immunity achieved thru nutrition and supplementation. If govts were truly concerned with health, all therapies would be available, inc. HCQ and ivermectin. Recommending vitamin D and zinc would be front page news. Since it is not, we realize the coercion and intimidation to get vaxxed is part of a sinister agenda. None of this is about health.

Ask yourself... would you make any decision in your personal life based upon advice from Biden or Fauci... or the CDC or NIH? Do you consider them credible sources? Would you buy a used car from them? Would you bet your life on their advice?

re: What Does a ‘Zero’ COVID Goal Really Mean?

Shasha — 5/30/2021 10:46:06 AM

Zero is not possible so they may eliminate all humans as they try to kill it. The Corona virus is the common cold. The weaponized kind may die out on it's own or mutate, but man assuming he can play god and eliminate it all fast is not science, but ego/desire to control/abuse maybe. Lyme is a bio-weapon also which they may not eliminate by their efforts, but it may eventually go away by itself.

re: What Does a ‘Zero’ COVID Goal Really Mean?

Red_Corvair — 5/30/2021 7:23:44 AM

'[Zero Covid] has far more evidence behind it than most strategies.' How fascinating! Like there is 'far more evidence' behind the 'necessary' steps (included in that 'zero covid strategy') of mass 'experimental' gene-therapy vaccination and the covid pass? Then what shall we do with the evidence that covid threatens only about 0.15% of the population who get sick with it, most of them suffering from underlying chronic health conditions? The 'scientific consensus' for 'zero covid' seems to overlook, for some reason, that 'small' detail.

Meanwhile it seems most of the 'doctors' in favor of the official narrative would have done very well under a regime such as Pol Pot's in the 1970s Cambodia, for instance. Who can trust anyone of them yet?

Medicine has to be rebuilt from the ground up! The totally corrupt medical institutions eat from the hand of the pharmaceutical giants and other crony corporate, whose aim is only direct profit, certainly not the best interest of the patient. People no longer trust their 'doctor' ! And with good reason!

re: What Does a ‘Zero’ COVID Goal Really Mean?

Almond — 5/18/2021 10:40:03 PM

This request is from Oregonians for Medical Freedom, an organization worthy of your support. You do not need to be an Oregonian to participate. Please take a minute to cut&paste your message. Do not allow a dangerous precedent to be set. Please ask the Senate Committee On Judiciary and Ballot Measure 110 Implementation members to pass HB3284 WITHOUT the -4 Amendment just introduced on 5/18. The work session is 5/24 at 8:00am. The -4 Amendment will essentially get rid of medical privacy. It wants to remove the following text from the bill; “(v) Whether the resident individual has received a vaccination against COVID-19;” The -4 amendment will allow anyone to use vaccine status for any means they want. The Amendment seeks to remove Covid-19 vaccination status as protected personal health information. This would allow businesses to discriminate and segregate based solely on vaccination status. It infringes on our Constitutional rights and is immoral to require anyone to give out personal medical information in order to obtain basic needs such as food or shelter. We all have a right to medical privacy and to participate in society without giving out our vaccine status. You can email this message to the listed contacts. Please support HB3284 as it currently is written, keeping Section 5 (c) intact and without the -4 Amendment. Please Contact:

Senator Floyd Prozanski: Sen.FloydProzanski@OregonLegislature.gov 503-986-1704

Senator Kim Thatcher: Sen.KimThatcher@oregonlegislature.gov 503-986-1713

Senator Michael Dembrow: Sen.MichaelDembrow@oregonlegislature.gov 503-986-1723

Senator Sara Gelser: Sen.SaraGelser@oregonlegislature.gov 503-986-1708

Senator Dallas Heard: sen.dallasheard@oregonlegislature.gov 503-986-1701

Senator Dennis Linthincum: sen.DennisLinthicum@oregonlegislature.gov 503-986-1728

Senator James Manning Jr.: sen.jamesmanning@oregonlegislature.gov 503-986-1707

re: What Does a ‘Zero’ COVID Goal Really Mean?

Randyfast — 5/17/2021 10:10:01 AM

Control, Elimination, Eradication and Extinction...sounds like a perfect description of Eugenics to me!

re: What Does a ‘Zero’ COVID Goal Really Mean?

bobbi10 — 5/17/2021 9:52:18 AM

The VA lab in Leeds MA is using 45 cycles on their PCR test, as of 3 days ago, to do their part in making the COVID cases never go away.

re: What Does a ‘Zero’ COVID Goal Really Mean?

brodiebrock12 — 5/17/2021 8:52:15 AM

nothing more than controlling a narrative...

re: What Does a ‘Zero’ COVID Goal Really Mean?

mammywitch — 5/17/2021 7:48:33 AM

All I can say to those who think it can be made zero is--"Dream on Alice, Wonderland is just around the corner!" It is intrinsic in nature to "mutate" to keep existing... :-]

re: What Does a ‘Zero’ COVID Goal Really Mean?

ursulariches — 5/17/2021 6:40:14 AM

Making Covid ZERO is going to harm us all when the scientists control the agenda, It will have the advantage of making covid disappear so the obviously GM man-made nature of it is lost for us to study. Like wiping fingerprints.