Reducing Data on Breakthrough Infections Not in Public Interest

re: Reducing Data on Breakthrough Infections Not in Public Interest

GreenBacker — 7/1/2021 9:37:18 AM

I've never even played a scientist on TV, and yet I am led to ask, what exactly are they pretending is the reason to keep moving the goalposts around every time the data begins to indicate a possible monumental health policy mistake? It seems the national Health Policy rule of thumb is driven by the preservation of our vaccination industry's profit juggernaut at all costs. America's prevailing Health Care Policy - Do whatever it takes to preserve industry profit margins at their current level, even if that means having to change what it is that we have always just called a spade. We need new metrics, or we're toast. My real question is does this goalpost relocation fully explain their headline that CV deaths are all unvaccinated? Me thinks yes. Can I get an acting job?

re: Reducing Data on Breakthrough Infections Not in Public Interest

steelj — 6/30/2021 9:13:30 AM

So what about other countries not under the thumb of the corrupt U.S. CDC? Will we be getting better data from some of them?

re: Reducing Data on Breakthrough Infections Not in Public Interest

mammywitch — 6/30/2021 7:04:05 AM

It's all a game of 'smoke and mirrors'---'look how many we have saved from dying'--'NO! Don't look at how many we have made ill who never would have been ill in the first place!'