<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://blogs.mercola.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /><title>Journal Rebuked for Publishing Biased Letter Signed by EcoHealth President</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2021/10/02/journal-rebuked-for-publishing-biased-letter-signed-by-ecohealth-president.aspx</link><description>In July 2021 and February 2021 the medical journal The Lancet printed letters signed by 24 scientists, physicians, epidemiologists and virologists that denied the possibility that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, originated in a lab. One of</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Debug Build: 31106.3070)</generator><item><title>re: Journal Rebuked for Publishing Biased Letter Signed by EcoHealth President</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2021/10/02/journal-rebuked-for-publishing-biased-letter-signed-by-ecohealth-president.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#1145340</link><pubDate>10/6/2021 8:39:16 AM</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:1145340</guid><dc:creator>Randyfast</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Covid&amp;quot; is starting to bore me to death! Hey...perhaps covid is &amp;quot;deadly&amp;quot; after all!&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Journal Rebuked for Publishing Biased Letter Signed by EcoHealth President</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2021/10/02/journal-rebuked-for-publishing-biased-letter-signed-by-ecohealth-president.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#1144382</link><pubDate>10/4/2021 10:24:34 AM</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:1144382</guid><dc:creator>Sean001</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Steve Hilton investigates origins of COVID-19, links to US commissioned research &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="https://video.foxnews.com/v/6225847837001#sp=show-clips"&gt;video.foxnews.com/.../6225847837001&lt;/a&gt; &amp;nbsp;This is the most likely deductive origin of Covid-19, if we hadn&amp;#39;t been made aware of its direct provenance.  This Norwegian virologist and his team realised the implications and were suppressed, but this article is still publicly available: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="https://www.minervanett.no/corona/the-most-logical-explanation-is-that-it-comes-from-a-laboratory/361860"&gt;www.minervanett.no/.../361860&lt;/a&gt; &amp;nbsp;Plus the article here quoting David Martin on over 4,000 Covid related patents lodged since 1999...&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Journal Rebuked for Publishing Biased Letter Signed by EcoHealth President</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2021/10/02/journal-rebuked-for-publishing-biased-letter-signed-by-ecohealth-president.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#1143712</link><pubDate>10/2/2021 4:07:47 PM</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:1143712</guid><dc:creator>ursulariches</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am pretty anti vax but not totally anti vax. Why does being called anti vax bother people so much? And why do the pro jabs want to use labels? Perhaps you should ask them want they would not want in a syringe? Ask anyone who calls you anti vax whether there is antything at all they would not want in their bodies through a syringe?  Ask them whether salts of lead would be OK with them, then mercury from an old thermometer, then aluminium hydroxide, then sodium hydroxide,  round up, anti freeze, clothes washing liquid, refriigerant from their fridge,  blood from aborted babies, blood from an animal with rabies?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Journal Rebuked for Publishing Biased Letter Signed by EcoHealth President</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2021/10/02/journal-rebuked-for-publishing-biased-letter-signed-by-ecohealth-president.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#1143581</link><pubDate>10/2/2021 7:55:56 AM</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:1143581</guid><dc:creator>mammywitch</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So many of these long established &amp;quot;science&amp;quot; publications are losing their credibility by censoring any challenging information when they should be &amp;quot;investigating the possibilities of credibility&amp;quot; of such challenges. None seem to be interested in anything except the &amp;quot;traditional&amp;quot; concepts of reality--&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Journal Rebuked for Publishing Biased Letter Signed by EcoHealth President</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2021/10/02/journal-rebuked-for-publishing-biased-letter-signed-by-ecohealth-president.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#1143552</link><pubDate>10/2/2021 6:46:46 AM</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:1143552</guid><dc:creator>rco94872</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It is real simple. Check the patent office as there is a patent on it. If a patent was issued it is man made. Patent office will not patent a naturally occurring substance. It was patented 3 times and then the fourth time the patent office said you are weaponizing this virus. Stop! They then did what companies do when told to stop, they took it overseas. Guess where. No need to investigate as it is all there.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Journal Rebuked for Publishing Biased Letter Signed by EcoHealth President</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2021/10/02/journal-rebuked-for-publishing-biased-letter-signed-by-ecohealth-president.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#1143457</link><pubDate>10/2/2021 12:14:43 AM</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:1143457</guid><dc:creator>norecovery</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A rigorous scientific inquiry must consider the possibility of a conspiracy, especially given the previous gang&amp;#39;s insistence on natural origins without corroborating evidence. I say it&amp;#39;s high time that pejorative term &amp;quot;conspiracy theory&amp;quot; was buried along with &amp;quot;anti-vaxxer.&amp;quot; Just the facts, please. Regardless of status, scientists and doctors and public health officials are all subject to corrupting (or stifling) influence.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>