<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://blogs.mercola.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /><title>Study: Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Is Only About 33% Effective</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2021/12/01/study-pfizer-covid19-vaccine-is-only-about-33-effective.aspx</link><description>Researchers studying a cohort of 787 health care workers have found that the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine not only loses its efficacy within a few months, but drops by a whopping 57% by six months after the second dose. Initial studies of BNT162b2 by Pfizer</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Debug Build: 31106.3070)</generator><item><title>re: Study: Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Is Only 33% Effective</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2021/12/01/study-pfizer-covid19-vaccine-is-only-about-33-effective.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#1170829</link><pubDate>12/6/2021 6:27:27 AM</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:1170829</guid><dc:creator>nicau3</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a question: With all the bio molecular studies on the SARS COVID 19, why hasn&amp;#39;t there been an effective antibody test to see if you have had the virus...&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Study: Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Is Only 33% Effective</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2021/12/01/study-pfizer-covid19-vaccine-is-only-about-33-effective.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#1170688</link><pubDate>12/5/2021 11:13:52 PM</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:1170688</guid><dc:creator>Raythe4th</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Gotta love the 33% symbolism here. Those evil bastards just love to use this number for everything. &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="https://www.bitchute.com/video/rTo37mT3pl0/"&gt;www.bitchute.com/.../rTo37mT3pl0&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Study: Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Is Only 33% Effective</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2021/12/01/study-pfizer-covid19-vaccine-is-only-about-33-effective.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#1170579</link><pubDate>12/5/2021 11:15:46 AM</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:1170579</guid><dc:creator>MR.PJB</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;tswearin2, Dr Ginge can speak for himself of course. Here I would say that the mortality of those who get the C19 shots is higher than the mortality rate, per age group, in an ordinary year. The excess mortality had not gone up sharply pre-shots but has gone up distinctly for the subgroup that got the shots. Compared against the background noise, as it were, of ordinary mortality rates. Now, of course, the drug makers want to focus on vaxed v unvaxed IF infected with C19. Trouble is, I &amp;nbsp;think, the categorization of deaths by cause is hopelessly muddled. It is like how we have, pre-C19, a big category called influenza-like-illness for the respiratory ailments that were not distinctly influenza. Run into category errors and bias of all kinds. But if can track who is vaxed and who is not, then, can compare mortality rates to some extent. STILL NOT SATISFAORY because of the muddling.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Study: Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Is Only 33% Effective</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2021/12/01/study-pfizer-covid19-vaccine-is-only-about-33-effective.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#1169149</link><pubDate>12/2/2021 8:14:41 AM</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:1169149</guid><dc:creator>Dr.Ginge</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok I take great issue with propagating the thinking that the Covid19 vaccines are effective. There is zero evidence that these vaccines prevent or lessen the severity of a Covid19 infection. In fact,  there is strong evidence that the antibodies produced are ineffective at preventing Covid19. There is only one official autopsy on a gentleman that died 4 weeks post second Pfizer jab  at  86 in Germany. The autopsy demonstrated that the  spike protein was disseminated in every organ but the olfactory bulb and the liver. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There was significant levels of IgG for the S1 spike protein Ag binding site. Which suggest that the antibody developed by the vaccine is non neutralising. Note out of Israel we know that those vaccinated have higher viral loads and are actually the ones spreading Covid-19. And the  fact that there are more people here in the US dead from Covid19 after the vaccines were available should give everyone cause for a pause. I get the danger of stating what I’ve just said. But prove to me the vaccines have a positive effect . I do not support the propaganda.  &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051011/"&gt;www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.../PMC8051011&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Study: Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Is Only 33% Effective</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2021/12/01/study-pfizer-covid19-vaccine-is-only-about-33-effective.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#1168955</link><pubDate>12/1/2021 11:03:27 PM</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:1168955</guid><dc:creator>TreeIsKey</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Only 33% effective against systems IF you catch the virus, and even then this &amp;#39;effective&amp;#39; measure drops off by 40 percent each month compared to a natural immunity that only drops off by 5 percent per month. But what damage does the vaccine do to a healthy individual whether s/he catches the virus or not. The chances of this kill shot or franken shot doing damage to any individual whether they have the virus or not is overwhelmingly greater than chances of catching the virus. And even if you do catch the virus you have better chances of coming out of it in good condition than having the junk injected into you, which is permanent. Especially the genetic material mRNA that mutates your genes. It begs the question, why would anyone in their right mind take the shot, whether your work tells you to, or a graduate program won&amp;#39;t allow you to enter without it? Yuck!!!! Prioritize your life -- either your health comes first or it doesn&amp;#39;t. If it doesn&amp;#39;t, you might end up like one of these people in these videos. And once you lose your health you lose everything because nothing else will matter anymore. Be wise!&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>