PCR Test Is Not Useful in Determining COVID Infectiousness

re: PCR Test Is Not Useful in Determining COVID Infectiousness

MR.PJB — 1/6/2022 12:03:14 PM

“would have people in isolation for a very long time if we were relying on PCRs,” she told ABC News. One day isolated because of a PCR results is a very long time, too long, and should be rejected.

re: PCR Test Is Not Useful in Determining COVID Infectiousness

lan5261 — 1/1/2022 9:54:07 AM

Please know this, readers...The Covid Tests themselves can be LETHAL especially if they are the deep nasal swab test up the nose touching the blood/brain barrier, which have been shown to contain graphine oxide and nano-bot creatures by medical experts. My twin sister (not vaxed) was living her happy health life, and had 6 of these swab tests within a 6 weeks time. She was DEAD 2 months after the last test, having dies of a brain tumor, spray of blood clots to the brain, double pneumonia and massive infection.. ALL of these came on suddenly within 6 weeks of her last nasal swab test. So horribly sad that she bought into the Covid testing lies. Do not EVER get any Covid test. They don't work, as described above, and may kill or cause you great harm. If you Have had these tests, get on Covid vax detox protocols immediately, Mercola has posted some great ones.

re: PCR Test Is Not Useful in Determining COVID Infectiousness

cat86887 — 1/1/2022 5:46:29 AM

I am constantly astounded by the stupidity I hear and see every day. The media instigated a panic to get tested because of the latest variant, showing long lines of cars lined up at test facilities and interviewing people who waited hours to get a covid test. Although I have seen no data reported on the additional number of tests performed, I have seen the so-called spikes in positive tests. It only stands to reason that if the daily number of tests administered increases dramatically m the number of so-called positive tests will increase dramatically. Data must be analyzed in context of factors that can influence that data, but the mainstream media is certainly not providing honest analysis.

re: PCR Test Is Not Useful in Determining COVID Infectiousness

brodiebrock12 — 12/30/2021 9:42:33 AM

One of the 2 reasons how the scamdemic became the new normal and allowed to continue. This and convincing people of the asymptomatic spreader myth. Anyone in the know knew this was a bad idea from the get go not to mention the developer of the PCR testing tech Mullis

re: PCR Test Is Not Useful in Determining COVID Infectiousness

mammywitch1 — 12/30/2021 8:18:16 AM

The people who are reporting on and commenting on Covid for the rest of us to hear and digest are only READING WHAT IS PUT IN FRONT OF THEM! They have no thought processes going on in that dumb s__t empty head of theirs! This is why there is so much confusion in what they are saying and telling people to do! The ONLY REASON to ever listen to their "NEWS" is to see how stupid they really are!

re: PCR Test Is Not Useful in Determining COVID Infectiousness

Ronybegoode — 12/29/2021 11:10:09 AM

Your text says "PCR tests ... can stay positive for up to 12 weeks". I understand after reading other information and seeing the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, in videos that the bits and pieces of DNA that the PCR test finds can be in the body for months, maybe a year. If that is the case, wouldn't have been more accurate for your text to say something like "PCR tests have been known to stay positive for 12 weeks and possibly months?".