BREAKING — New Information on Jab Injuries Is an ‘Alarming Signal’

re: BREAKING — New Information on Jab Injuries Is an ‘Alarming Signal’

vic5398 — 2/28/2022 8:10:26 AM

It’s never going to be ENOUGH of the jabs. It’s all about money and pharma getting rich. The more they demand more and more jabs to “comply” the more money they make. It’s never ending What a racket !!!!

re: BREAKING — New Information on Jab Injuries Is an ‘Alarming Signal’

junieb — 2/26/2022 1:48:51 AM

A few life insurance companies have sounded alerts also. One in Indiana for sure.

re: BREAKING — New Information on Jab Injuries Is an ‘Alarming Signal’

tallulah3 — 2/24/2022 8:16:58 AM

Why are people still getting this? If you waited this long all I have to say is God help you

re: BREAKING — New Information on Jab Injuries Is an ‘Alarming Signal’

YouMatter — 2/24/2022 8:13:17 AM

Yesterday I read that “only” 90,000 people per day are getting their first shot in the US. The rate hasn’t been that low since the early days of the shots (when the availability was limited). So it’s obvious the shots don’t work (everyone knows someone who is “fully” shot up and got it anyway) and surely most are getting a clue that there are safety concerns, and yet, 90,000 per day are getting it!?!!? Awful.

re: BREAKING — New Information on Jab Injuries Is an ‘Alarming Signal’

feelingood99 — 2/24/2022 7:03:50 AM

We know by this time the shots are all garbage and corruption - We just have to refuse more shots, and advise our govt reps that we are refusing. Most people I know who have had them don’t want more. There has to be mass non compliance for this perverse effort to fail.

re: BREAKING — New Information on Jab Injuries Is an ‘Alarming Signal’

DebbyW — 2/24/2022 6:08:39 AM

When were our leaders ever ethical?

re: BREAKING — New Information on Jab Injuries Is an ‘Alarming Signal’

nickjj — 2/23/2022 10:29:43 PM

And those are the injection events that are acknowledged. It seems harder in the USA. Due to the way the CDC defines 'unvaccinated'. This is the CDC definition of "unvaccinated" I found on a search (It had been posted 5/25/2021). However, I cannot find a current reference to this on the CDC website today. It is outside my abilities to figure this out. The question I wanted to answer is -- When a person fills out a VAERS form, but the adverse vaccine reaction happened in the period of time indicated (more or equal to 2 weeks), they are still not classified as vaccinated? So confusing.

"For the purposes of this guidance, people are considered fully vaccinated for COVID-19 ≥2 weeks after they have received the second dose in a 2-dose series (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), or ≥2 weeks after they have received a single-dose vaccine (Johnson & Johnson [J&J]/Janssen)±; there is currently no post-vaccination time limit on fully vaccinated status. Unvaccinated people refers to individuals of all ages, including children, that have not completed a vaccination series or received a single-dose vaccine." www.cdc.gov/.../fully-vaccinated-guidance.html So. in the USA that means you can get a vaccine shot, have a reaction, and still be classified as unvaccinated in the data?

re: BREAKING — New Information on Jab Injuries Is an ‘Alarming Signal’

weehen — 2/23/2022 9:40:58 PM

If anything can expose the lies it will probably be insurance companies. Delicious irony in that…may it all unravel with speed!

re: BREAKING — New Information on Jab Injuries Is an ‘Alarming Signal’

Ringer2 — 2/23/2022 9:24:03 PM

Yes. Please read the entire article, and while you're there, please subscribe. Even better, help Steve Kirsch by joining as a substack member so you can participate.