<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://blogs.mercola.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /><title>Lunatic Recommendations For Statin Drug Use</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2004/04/20/Lunatic-Recommendations-For-Statin-Drug-Use.aspx</link><description>There must have been a full moon out when the author of today's Annals of Internal Medicine wrote his paper on recommendations for diabetics. Either that or he sold out long ago to the drug companies. Isn't it bad enough that the statins are the number</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Debug Build: 31106.3070)</generator></channel></rss>