<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://blogs.mercola.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /><title>Low-Fat May Not Always be The Best For The Heart </title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2004/05/06/Low-Fat-May-Not-Always-be-The-Best-For-The-Heart-.aspx</link><description>A study suggested that a high amount of fat in the diet might be beneficial to a person with healthy cholesterol levels, however extreme restriction of fat might produce the opposite effect. The study found that after 11 healthy, but not physically active</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Debug Build: 31106.3070)</generator></channel></rss>