<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://blogs.mercola.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /><title>Feds Ignore Vioxx Warnings</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2004/11/12/feds-ignore-vioxx-warnings.aspx</link><description>It's very interesting and disturbing for me to read in the wake of Vioxx being pulled from the U.S. market and signs that patients were suffering from heart attacks during drug trials as far back as 2000, a federal drug safety adviser's invitation to</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Debug Build: 31106.3070)</generator></channel></rss>