<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://blogs.mercola.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /><title>Who Should Be Deciding Risk―Engineers or Experts in Biology?</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2012/06/20/who-should-be-deciding-risk_1520_engineers-or-experts-in-biology.aspx</link><description>After a long spell of sitting on their hands, officials at the FCC have decided to review their safety guidelines for RF radiation emitted from cell phones and other electromagnetic fields. This would be the first time since 1996 they’ve taken a look</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Debug Build: 31106.3070)</generator></channel></rss>