<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://blogs.mercola.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /><title>Reuters Versus UN Cancer Agency: Are Corporate Ties Influencing Science Coverage?</title><link>https://blogs.mercola.com:443/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2017/07/26/reuters-versus-un-cancer-agency-are-corporate-ties-influencing-science-coverage.aspx</link><description>FAIR , a media critic group that scrutinizes media practices, is taking issue with the way media giant Reuters handles news on the pesticide industry. Specifically, FAIR is accusing Reuters of unbalanced coverage favoring industry on the United Nations&amp;rsquo;</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Debug Build: 31106.3070)</generator></channel></rss>