Eating this food can irreversibly damage sperm

re: Eating this food can irreversibly damage sperm

Almond — 6/28/2019 1:53:12 PM

One particular food item that puts people at risk is refined oils. I notice that when I use unrefined oils and butter, they wash off dishes easily with soap. I do not use the bad crap myself, but have noticed how easily it sticks and burns onto cookware. This is because processed oils are essentially already rancid whether or not they have bad odors.

The worst offender for causing infertility may be the prevalent use of cottonseed oil in the crappiest of junk foods--even salad dressings. Cotton root is a known abortificant. Oils are concentrated in seeds. This lowers fertility. Fertility is an indicator of health. Yet, these oils are still allowed to be sold.

Then, there are the problems of chemical and heavy metal contamination. Anything that has the potential to block metabolic pathways is suspect.

This also alters the bio-electrical functioning of the body. We are beings of light, descended from an original spark. Like the flame of a torch passed on to a new generation, life form should not be arbitrarily altered. Esp. for profit motives.

re: Eating this food can irreversibly damage sperm

rrealrose — 6/28/2019 12:52:26 PM

Ah yes, slightly off topic yet looks like everyone in Big Food sees giant market potential, and is jumping on the fake meat bandwagon. Here's a link to yet another giant investment: markets.businessinsider.com/.../beyond-meat-stock-price-sales-data-consumers-ramping-up-purchases-2019-6-1028310860 and this news came out yesterday: www.marketwatch.com/.../as-beyond-meat-soars-conagra-sees-30-billion-opportunity-in-gardein-plant-based-meat-alternatives-2019-06-27 - perfect opportunity? Doubt this will last long once truth comes out that real food imparts information, not a fake burger, sausage or party platter.

re: Eating this food can irreversibly damage sperm

jamessmom — 6/28/2019 10:15:32 AM

When my husband and I first tried to have children, he had only 50% normal morphology, which was considered sub-standard, because the worldwide average was 75%. That was thirty years ago. Now, to my shock, I just read the the worldwide average is 4 to 14%. While we need to reduce the human population drastically to become a sustainable species, this is not the way.