SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
Do the Makers of Splenda Know Something They Aren't Telling You?

Johnson & Johnson, the U.S. manufacturer of Splenda, owns the domain name www.SplendaIsNotSafe.com.

This is only one of many similar domain names owned by either Johnson & Johnson or Tate & Lyle, the United Kingdom-based Splenda manufacturing company. Other domain names they own pair words such as victims, poison, kills and dangers with Splenda.

Daily Domainer.com March 16, 2007


Dr. Mercola's Comment:

If Johnson & Johnson believed that Splenda was safe, why would they own the domain name www.SplendaIsNotSafe.com?

Do manufacturers of other common food items do this? Does Cheetos own CheetosIsNotSafe.com? Does Dannon Yogurt own DannonIsNotSafe.com or YogurtIsNotSafe.com? Of course not, because they have no reason to be concerened about toxic side effects from their products.

If you want to know the reasons why Johnson & Johnson jumped on this domain you can read the book that took me two years to write, Sweet Deception.

The book has been out for nearly six months, and although Johnson & Johnson had threatened on multiple occasions to sue me in lengthy 30-page letters from high-powered New York law firms, they have not filed suit. Why? Because the book is carefully documented and everything in it can be defended.

This book is not only a primer on Splenda but all artificial sweeteners. Although I am the primary author, we actually had more than five full-time professionals researching this topic for two years. So it is a solid documentary as to how and why Johnson & Johnson is getting away with this fraud and deception.

In fact, there is absolutely NO INDEPENDENT evidence for the safety of sucralose. Every study demonstrating safety (and there are very few of those) was conducted by the manufacturer.

It's important to understand that the source of funds for a study strongly influences the conclusion and findings. This becomes crystal clear when you examine the results of aspartame research.

In an analysis of 166 articles published in medical journals from 1980 to 1985, Dr. Ralph G. Walton, a professor of psychiatry at Northeastern Ohio University's College of Medicine, found that 100 percent of the 74 studies financed by the industry attested to the sweetener's safety. However, of the 92 independently funded articles, 92 percent identified adverse health effects.

Related Articles:





 
 Do you find this article interesting?
Comment on This Article Community Comments (23)
 
 
Posted On Mar 19, 2007
J&J/Splenda does not sue, because this will open up a Pandora's Box in legal DISCOVERY, of them having to reveal the real toxic studies they never published (nor allowed FDA to see - following the Monsanto play book on deadly aspartame approval) on the many human harms of their artificial product, not made from sugar, but chemically manipulated from three chlorine (the gas used in WWI trench warfare) molecules linked to a sucrose molecule, in an Tate & Lyle Lab in the UK. 

Maybe they are too busy destroying these documents or transferring them back o the UK to make it harder to get them?

READ Dr. Mercola's SWEET DECPTION to protect yourself, your family, and your friend's health - it's a BLOCKBUSTER in real truth that is protecting YOUR health!!!

One need look no further than the EPA's reporting of potential cancer toxicity exposure in the ground water & air, in and around the Alabama Splenda plant, where this poison is manufactured, and the filed complaints from residences around the Splenda plant, to know this stuff should be ingested at no level, by anyone.

REMEMBER there is NO CALORIE savings in taking Splenda!!!  It is "zero calories" only in the table top sachets, where the lobbied for law allows for ALL high intensity sweeteners to declare no calories if the serving size is below 5 grams in weight.

Whether in the sachets, or the larger bags or boxes for baking (by the way, it does not work like sugar in baking at much higher cost and GRAVE exposure to your health) the artificial chemical sucralose (Splenda brand) is blended with totally caloric excipients (bulking agents) like sugar, dextrose (corn sugar), maltodextrin/aerated maltodextrin (corn), fake fibers, salt, fructose, etc.

Thus the argumentation you are not getting blood glucose spikes with Splenda brand baking sweetener is a FRAUD (besides any baking product has a CHLORINE aftertaste and a texture resembling a BRICK.

 
Russ Bianchi
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 9/2006
Russ Bianchi  
Replied

Patri
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 3/2007
Patri  
 
Posted On Mar 21, 2007
I just have to share this.  I suggested the Splenda subject, referenceing Dr. Mercola's above article to the owner of Diet Blog.  He did add an entry on the subject with a 'thanks Patricia' (me).

The ensuing emotional, almost juvenile responses really were eyeopening for me.

http://www.diet-blog.com/archives/2007/03/20/splenda_buys_hundreds_of_antisplenda_domains.php

Suddenly I realised I wasn't amongst 'like minded' - people interested in alternative health care etc.  I couldn't understand the adamant reactions of these people.  I do now.  They 'just don't want to know'. 

Haven't we heard that one before!  Wow...I've never gotten such a flaming response ever, before!


Birdlady
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 6/2006
Birdlady  
 
Posted On Apr 03, 2007
I think a lot of people read articles about how bad splenda, aspartame and all of those other names for artificial sweeteners are, but they just think "it won't happen to me".  I have known for about 3 years how bad these products can be and I completely eliminated them from my diet. I tried to warn my family, but they would never listen to me.

Well, about two weeks ago my sister who is only 25 years old has been diagnosed with a brain cancer. Yes, a malignant brain tumor. I think that her aspartame and splenda use is the cause for this brain tumor. Her doctors told her she is a 25 year old anomaly, but I do not think so. She is a victim of aspartame poisoning.

I am trying to get her to sue them because her entire life and future is at stake and these companies knew darn well the dangers in it. =(

Russ, I agree with you completely. I do recommend everyone to read Mercola's book Sweet Deceptions. It is excellent and it gives you all the information you ever need to know about sweeteners.


Jeff Eatgood
Novice User Novice User Joined On 4/2007
Jeff Eatgood  
 
Posted On Apr 04, 2007
I have a friend who had a father who drank 24 cans of Miller Lite beer daily. Very respectable man. Drank only after work. After MANY years of this bad habit, he quit. He then began drinking DIET SODA in the same quantity as a habit of drinking. Within 5 years he got cancer that ate he entire body and died at 65. He was very healthy while drinking his case of beer every day.  But got cancer after changing to DIET SODA!


helpingheart
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 6/2006
helpingheart  
 
Posted On Apr 04, 2007
Patri - I admire your bravery.  Nate must be paid by Tate & Lyle to surf the net and defend their LIES.

Everyone here should go on your link and add their own opinion of Splenda, uh I mean Chlorine/DDT (Banned in Japan).

Good work, fellow alternative healthy one!


Bill McDougald
Novice User Novice User Joined On 1/2007
Bill McDougald  
 
Posted On Apr 12, 2007
 Good Points Russ. I know we cannot print this stuff but there are many monopolies who are advised by some elite groups who want to kill billions of people with drugs, wars and the food supply. They also control organized crime so they get their way with anyone. That is why many authorities seem stupid or just plain greedy.
 
Tyrus


Wolfsraven
Novice User Novice User Joined On 7/2008
Wolfsraven  
 
Posted On Jul 22, 2008
I started using splenda about three years ago.  Dropped 20 lbs right off the bat.  However, during the third year, I began noticing everytime I ate, a huge lump would appear on the lymph node beside my ear.  A huge, PAINFUL! lump.  It got to the point I could not even eat.  I eventually figured out it was teh splenda causing this pain and swelling.  So I stopped using .  I was then able to eat again.  My concern is what have I already done to myself by using this product?  I fear this is not the end of it.

 
 
 
Posted On Mar 19, 2007

Nick Alexander of the IFIC (International Food Information Council – industry front) refers to the Internet as causing confusion and misunderstanding – a barrier to understanding all the GOOD things about aspartame.

In their online document “Everything you need to know about Aspartame” they state “The safety of aspartame has been documented time and time again and is supported by over three decades of research with over 200 scientific studies.”

I searched Medline, and could find only one human trial pertaining to safety. Undeterred, I emailed Nick Alexander to ask him for this reference list.

I received quite a lengthy email in response. I include only an excerpt:

“… please know that the [IFIC] brochure to which you refer is a general information document, not a scientific paper: in the interest of offering summary answers to typical questions, in plain language, the writers of this brochure found it wise and practical not to include a lengthy bibliography. The figure “200” in reference to publicly-available scientific studies affirming the safety of Aspartame is an approximate “round figure” which probably understates the actual scientific status regarding this low-calorie sweetener.

As an aside, we find that confusion and misunderstanding on this issue continue to proliferate, especially on the Internet, where so many scientifically valid resources reside, that it is truly mystifying how misinformation should survive [my emphasis].”

Well how queer! If this list of 200 studies existed then surely Mr Alexander would be falling over himself to provide them.

Yes, there are a multitude of sites out there promulgating misinformation and most of them are owned or placed there by the food and pharmaceutical companies. So the claim that over 200 studies have shown safety of aspartame would be laughable were it not harming so many people.

Show me the studies Mr Alexander!


 
PPARGammaGirl
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 6/2006
PPARGammaGirl  
Replied

Russ Bianchi
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 9/2006
Russ Bianchi  
 
Posted On Mar 19, 2007
Hi Cathy:

You'll never see any of the requested hard data, because there is none. 

The Calorie Control Council is another bad for you industry front, also trying to hoist the same false, misleading, deceptive, fraudulent and non scientific tactics on an unsuspecting public, directly out of the  Big Tobacco playbook, when it comes to CANER CAUSING and laxative polyols, as well as all poisonous FDA approved for general use, but NOT Generally Recognized As Safe, high intensity sweeteners (aspartame, neotame, sucralose, asulphame potassium, saccharine)...

When one reads or hears something from either the IFIC or CCC think of The Tobacco Institute....

These pseudo organizations/PR fronts, that are NOT scientifically based, would promote selling strychnine, arsenic, and hemlock in tea bags, and call them "herbal, natural and therapeutic" if there were a retainer fee in it for them.  

How do I gently puts this?  THEY ARE OF THE SAME PROFESSIONAL STATUS AS INDEPENDENT STREET PERSONS (Sometimes Organized Under Roofs In Establishments Named After Felines) SELLING A GOOD TIME...your side effects may vary.

 
 
 
Posted On Mar 19, 2007
Makes you wander what the have to hide by registering all those domain names that could be construed as being against their product.

mmc88121

 
mmc88121
Moderator User Moderator User, Joined On 11/2006
mmc88121  
Replied

Lynn46
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 12/2006
Lynn46  
 
Posted On Mar 20, 2007
mmc88121,
J&J has everything to hide. Of course they want to hide negative safety reports in the same way as CathyVM (above) says is the case for aspartame. You're looking at this question (buying up domain names) from the wrong side of the fence. J&J and their associates have bought up all the obvious domain names so that no one who wants to detail the dangers of Splenda can buy these domain names to put forth their own information.

The manufacturers of toxic products have the money and lawyers to attempt to discredit anyone who wants to present truthful information about questionable prodicts. Buying up domain names is just another tactic that they use.

BTW, I have not purchased Dr. Mercola's book, Sweet Deception, but I have read everything I can find on the mercola.com site about artificial sweeteners.

 
 
 
Posted On Mar 19, 2007

This was taken from www.dorway.com. I am sure most of you have heard this before or have read it. If not, then I would check out Dr. Mercola's book, the DVD Sweet Misery and the website below to shake the aspartame out of ya!

Abdominal Pain
Anxiety attacks
arthritis
asthma
Asthmatic Reactions
Bloating, Edema (Fluid Retention)
Blood Sugar Control Problems (Hypoglycemia or Hyperglycemia)
Brain Cancer (Pre-approval studies in animals)
Breathing difficulties
burning eyes or throat
Burning Urination
can't think straight
Chest Pains
chronic cough
Chronic Fatigue
Confusion
Death
Depression
Diarrhea
Dizziness
Excessive Thirst or Hunger
fatigue
feel unreal
flushing of face
Hair Loss (Baldness) or Thinning of Hair
Headaches/Migraines dizziness
Hearing Loss
Heart palpitations
Hives (Urticaria)
Hypertension (High Blood Pressure)
Impotency and Sexual Problems
inability to concentrate
Infection Susceptibility
Insomnia
Irritability
Itching
Joint Pains
laryngitis
"like thinking in a fog"
Marked Personality Changes
Memory loss
Menstrual Problems or Changes
Migraines and Severe Headaches (Trigger or Cause From Chronic Intake)
Muscle spasms
Nausea or Vomiting
Numbness or Tingling of Extremities
Other Allergic-Like Reactions
Panic Attacks
Phobias
poor memory
Rapid Heart Beat
Rashes
Seizures and Convulsions
Slurring of Speech
Swallowing Pain
Tachycardia
Tremors
Tinnitus
Vertigo
Vision Loss
Weight gain

Aspartame Disease Mimics Symptoms or Worsens the Following Diseases

Fibromyalgia
Arthritis
Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
Parkinson's Disease
Lupus
Multiple Chemical Sensitivities (MCS)
Diabetes and Diabetic Complications
Epilepsy
Alzheimer's Disease
Birth Defects
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Lymphoma
Lyme Disease
Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD)
Panic Disorder
Depression and other Psychological Disorders
For the rest of the article, go to www.dorway.com. 

 
Josh Rubin
Moderator User Moderator User, Joined On 6/2006
Josh Rubin  
 
 
 
Posted On Apr 04, 2007
I think it is very suspect that when I forwarded the link to this page to my brother in the UK and the article on Mercola.com entitled:

The Dangers of Chlorine and Issues With Sucralose


he was unable to access it!!! The message that came up for him when he followed the correct link to these articles is as follows:
 

Page Unavailable

 

Attorneys acting on behalf of the manufacturers of sucralose, Tate & Lyle PLC based in London, England, have requested that the information contained on this page not be made available to Internet users in England.


Scary! If websites are being restricted, what else don't we know?

 
miranda_203
Novice User Novice User, Joined On 8/2006
miranda_203  
Replied

texmex
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 6/2006
texmex  
 
Posted On Apr 04, 2007
Oh yes Internet can have censorship and it is the case with the mercola.com site and splenda subject, UK can NOT view the information.
So why is this censorship if there is nothing to hide?

 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.