SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
New Danger Associated With Drinking Ordinary Milk

Milk in its raw form is healthier that pasteurized milk, a fact made abundantly clear in a recent study by Dr. Loren Cordain about the presence of betacellulin, the growth factor found in the whey fraction of milk.

Dr. Cordain cites 25 studies connecting increased rates of cancer to drinking pasteurized milk due to betacellulin, as it passes into the adult digestive tract intact, then comes in contact with receptors and the circulation that stimulates the growth of cancer cells throughout the body.

The factor that makes raw milk a healthier choice, as it protects your health from betacellulin: The presence of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). CLA blunts the cancer-causing effect of betacellulin and has prevented cancer in lab tests too, particularly in conjunction with saturated fat.

Wise Traditions (not currently posted)


Dr. Mercola's Comment:

Just a reminder, organic milk may be free from hormones and other contaminants, but it's still pasteurized, a destructive process that eliminates virtually any good bacteria already present, and may have lower levels of CLA too. Milk in its purest raw form, on the other hand, is rich in conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). The CLA content is also five times greater in milk produced by grass-fed cows.

Although organic milk is certainly far better than non-organic milk because it does not contain harmful pesticide and hormone residues, it is vitally important to understand that nearly all raw milk is better than organic milk.

Even though it is a challenge to obtain raw milk, it is far better to obtain your milk from raw sources than it is to purchase organic milk.
There simply is no comparison in the quality. Grass-fed raw milk is even better.

Most of the time with milk, the certification is an expensive certification process that doesn't add any value to the milk other than to assure you that the milk was raised under clean conditions.

Ideally, you should locate the dairy yourself and do your own inspection. Talk to the farmer and see how the cows are being raised. That beats any type of certification process that can be easily manipulated.

Additionally raw milk:

  • Causes fewer allergies: Raw milk more than halves the levels of immunoglobulin E (IgE), a chemical pumped out by cells in response to an allergen.

  • Has more nutrients: Raw milk is an outstanding source of nutrients including healthy beneficial bacteria such as lactobacillus acidophilus, vitamins and enzymes.

  • Is healthier: Raw milk is not associated with any of the health problems surrounding pasteurized milk such as rheumatoid arthritis, skin rashes, diarrhea and cramps. Even people who have been allergic to pasteurized milk for many years can typically tolerate and even thrive on raw milk.

  • Tastes better: As with any food, fresher is always better and this applies to milk as well. Fresh raw milk is creamier and better tasting than pasteurized milk that has a shelf life of several weeks.

If you've been looking for a raw milk source near you but have had no luck finding one, you'll want to review the listings on the Real Milk Web site.

Related Articles:





 
 Do you find this article interesting?
Comment on This Article Community Comments (58)
 
 
Posted On Mar 20, 2007
After reading this I went to Wise Traditions (Weston Price Foundation), since it was linked in the article above.  I searched for "Loren Cordain", and got 11 hits.  They had plenty of negative to say about Loren Cordain and nothing positive.  Not enough room here, so try it yourself.

That of course is not an objective way to evaluate his work on betacellulin.  That will take some time, so for now I did the following:

I searched westonaprice.org and PubMeb for research on milk consumption and cancer.  I found mixed results, with more evidence that milk consumption prevents cancer than that it causes cauncer.

Try it yourself.  It's easy.

Duane

 
Witch Doctor
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 9/2006
Witch Doctor  
Replied

Bryan - oz4caster
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 6/2006
Bryan - oz4caster  
 
Posted On Mar 20, 2007
Duane, Loren Cordain describes his research on betacellulin in his PaleoDiet Newsletter for December 15, 2006.  However, he makes no mention of the beneficial conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), the only good trans fat, found in dairy as well as meat.  I assume that the CLA side of the story came from WAPF.

Cathy, I agree that Loren Cordain should read more about the benefits of cholesterol and saturated fat.  Another book he should read:  Anthony Colpo's The Great Cholesterol Con.


Witch Doctor
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 9/2006
Witch Doctor  
 
Posted On Mar 21, 2007
Bryan - thank you.  I am reading it now.  Duane

(Off topic)

Cathy - Yes I am.  When I run out of clean water I am often lazy and drink tap water for a time.  Thanks to you, I now have two more reasons to stop drinking it altogether.  I am quite sure that the added fluoride compounds represent a bigger danger than chlorine.  But what about naturally occurring fluoride that I pick up in spring water, mineral water etc...?

By the way, I found non-hydrogenated Tenderflake pork lard at canadianfavourites.com, and ordered some.  I also picked up 2 books that just arrived - The Whole Beast: Nose to Tail Eating by Fergus Henderson and Bones: Recipes, History, and Lore by Jennifer McLagan.

But where to find goose fat?

Duane


Sean Uisce
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 11/2006
Sean Uisce  
 
Posted On Mar 22, 2007
Hi Duane (off - topic), while I have no evidence to back it up, I suspect that my body will be better able to cope with naturally occurring fluorides in spring waters than with the artificial fluoridating agent dropped into water supplies.  Our Irish version of which is only 22% fluorine - the remainder being a mixture of other wonderful lovelies like lead and arsenic and what have you...

If you can, perhaps you ought to consider a Reverse Osmosis filter (The Merlin point-of-use system made by GE seems the best value for domestic use that I've come across to date.  User friendly to fit.  No tank - it processes the water on demand if you have sufficient incoming water pressure.  It takes up less space.  There's less pipes and filters).


charshan
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 4/2007
charshan  
 
Posted On Apr 03, 2007
Duane:

I am not sure how to use this posting feature, but I do want to add to some comments below on fluoride -- it is harmful to our health and adding to the water supply constitutes forced medication, in my opinion.

Fluoride is a halogen and dispaces iodine, a nutrient. Fluoride is harmful to teeth -- one vernacular example is in Great Britain -- notorious for poor dental health despite a health-care system that is better than the US one -- UK consumption of tea is very high, and tea is very high in fluoride.

Stop using fluoride in water, toothpaste (try cleaning with baking soda and bar soap made with oils for a truly clean feel in your mouth). Consider iodine supplementation -- you are probably deficient in iodine, which can lead to thyroid sluggishness, cystic disorders. Iodine will also chelate metals from your body.



Witch Doctor
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 9/2006
Witch Doctor  
 
Posted On Apr 03, 2007
charshan - thanks for that info on fluoride and iodine.  I believe I will add an iodine supplement, since it helps with two problems you identified.   I will also more diligently avoid the lazy temptation to dink tap water, altogether.  Now I am concerned about the fluoride I pick up in the shower.

Is there anything one can do about the fluoride in tea?  Do you know? 
Thanks!  Duane


dale_3
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2006
dale_3  
 
Posted On Apr 03, 2007
i bought an almond milk maker and i will never drink regular milk again.....all i need is a supply of raw  organic almonds and my machine...the best milk ever!!...by the way   www.dontforgettotakeyourvitamins.com/hermosillo40559

 
 
 
Posted On Mar 20, 2007
All my life I worried because I never drank milk. The experts insisted you needed it to be healthy but I hated it so much I couldn't even force myself for my own "good". I think now that it was my subconcious protecting me.
And boy was I surprised last year when I tried raw organic milk - I loved it, my body loved it, and although I try to limit my intake since I'm a protein type, I still drink a cup every day. And raw butter and cheese are wonderful products too!

 
Bridestein
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 12/2006
Bridestein  
Replied

Mary Sue Laing
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2006
Mary Sue Laing  
 
Posted On Apr 08, 2007
I've been making my own kefir with organic raw milk from grass fed cows and goats for over two years now.  I'm 65 years old, and I feel better and stronger than I did 20 years ago!  I can work harder and longer and lift heavier loads than the other, younger members of my household.  I had my last viral infection (a cold) before I began making the kefir.
    I try to persuade my friends and relatives to drink it too.  I have found that the more sugar, transfats, perservatives, and overprocessed grains a person eats, the harder it is for that person to eat anything healthy, including kefir or even fresh raw milk and dairy products.  However, if a person keeps trying tastes do change over time.
Mary Sue Laing
A grateful follower of Dr. Mercola

 
 
 
Posted On Apr 03, 2007

I grew up in Hungary. The milk we bought in my childhood was, I assume, raw milk. But it had to be boiled before you could drink it, otherwise you could have gotten sick.

When you sing the praises of raw milk, Dr. Mecrola, you never mention that it needs to be boiled before you can use it. Or is that not so?


 
poet66
Novice User Novice User, Joined On 4/2007
poet66  
Replied

traveler4too
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2006
traveler4too  
 
Posted On Apr 03, 2007
Raw milk from a certified clean dairy does not need to be boiled. That defeats the purpose of the raw milk. That's what pasteurization is. While it is possible to get sick from milk, (you can get sick from anything) it is less likely to happen from a good dairy. Many regular dairies don't worry about the cleanliness since they are "killing all the bad germs" and allow fecal material and other bacteriological debris to be in the milk.
An excellent book on milk is "The Untold Story of Milk" by Ron Schmid, ND.
A recent Mercola article linked to a Time Magazine article. It mentioned that 168 outbreaks of illness' were traced to dairy products and 1/3 was to raw milk. Well, that means the other 2/3rds was the "good" pasteurized stuff.


kfarias_203
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 6/2006
kfarias_203  
 
Posted On Apr 03, 2007
I belong to a dairy co-op in Georgia.  We get cows and goats milk. RAW.  The people in my group always talk about how much healthier they have become since their consumption of raw milk.  Personally, I don' t know why the woman got a rapidly growing tumour from drinking raw dairy, or how she explains the milk as being at fault. [I'm not saying it isn't] - But, I do know this, history has shown that the longest lived communities of peoples throughout history thrived and lived long lives some into their 100's on goats milk.  If raw milk causes tumours than our whole group is in trouble, I would assume.  I believe that people 100's of year ago, drank raw milk did not have many of the diseases of today.  I"m not a lab technician and don't always understand the technical side of things.  But, I no longer consume pastuerized milk or pastuerized cheese.  Pastureized cheese tastes like plastic to me now and the pastuerized milk smells funny to me.  I don't drink a lot of milk, maybe a cup a day with my Ezekial cereal and raw honey in the morning, and once in awhile a glass of milk [raw of course].  If we shouldn't be drinking milk [at all] as some post on here, then we should also not cook our foods, take vitamins like Krill [who in history ate Krill?, I mean, isn't that whale food?], take pharmecuetical concoctions unless they are herbs, etc..etc.. ad nauseum.  I believe goats milk especially was drank by those who could not otherwise get their vitamins in other areas [the creator takes care of these things you see].  I personally, work 10 hours a day, INDOORS, almost impossible for me to get enough vitamin D from the sun.  So, having said that, I believe that drinking raw goats milk is healthy, and I highly doubt it would responsible for any cancers. Considering people have been drinking it for centuries and they certainly wouldn't have had the longevity that I have read about.  JMHO.


kfarias_203
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 6/2006
kfarias_203  
 
Posted On Apr 03, 2007
My daughter is in college in a Didactic program.  She is studing nutrition to those of you who don't know what Didactic is.  She says that we need fat, that the low-fat craze is causing damange to our cells which need fat to protect the cell-membrane.  This doesn't mean "fried" foods and/or weird contrived oils like CON-OLA!......it was meant for us to eat meat, and healthy fat oils, as we no longer live in the Garden of Eden, we need the protein to survive and although vegetables and fruits keep us healthy and flowing, protein from meat sustains us.  When we say meat, we mean clean , all grass fed cows [meat].  Not corn-fed.  I say this  to the "what do cows eat crowd" - well, they [cows] don't drink milk to nurse their babies, and they certainly weren't created to eat corn, they were created to eat grass and pass that on to humans who consume them.  The good thing about all of this, no one has to drink raw milk if they don't want to.  All I know is that everyone I know that drinks it is robustly healthy.


Magnolia
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 6/2006
Magnolia  
 
Posted On Apr 03, 2007
I am interested in finding out where the Georgia raw milk coop Kfarias mentions in the post is. I am in Atlanta and cannot find a source of fresh raw milk anywhere.


Camper
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 1/2007
Camper  
 
Posted On Apr 04, 2007
I am concerned about the lady who thinks she is getting her vitamin D from goat milk. Raw milk is not a source of vitamin D. May I suggest Carlson's Cod Liver Oil? The lemon-flavored one tastes great and is free of contaminants. I wouldn't say anything, but vit. D is so important. People think that milk is a good source of vit.D because it is added to milk that is sold commercially. I personally do not use anything but raw goat milk products because of the casein in cow's milk. For info on casein, wheat (also barley & rye), soy and corn, see: www.dogtorj.com. His website is unorganized, but interesting. He is a veterinarian, but researches the effects of the above foods in people and animals. Dogs that have epilepsy have no more seizures when kept on a diet free of the above foods. Casein, wheat gluten, soy and corn gluten are all used to make industrial strength glues and they pretty much glue the mitochondria in our intestines. Some people tolerate them better than others, but I don't think they are good for anyone. I think they will get us sooner - or later. (Goat's milk does not contain casein.)


Bill McDougald
Novice User Novice User Joined On 1/2007
Bill McDougald  
 
Posted On Apr 13, 2007
Well poet66, if you boiled your milk then you must have killed all the good enzymes needed to absorb any nutrients as Dr. Mercola has elsewhere on his site a study that shows that all food and liquids have a critical temperature between 189 and 206 degrees and just one degree above this critical temperature all the enzymes are lost and many if not most of the phytonutrients are lost. See his May 28, 2002 newsletter for this report.

A better way to "purify" raw milk is to add a drop of Essential Lemon Oil which will kill all manner of bacteria on contact but leaves the good stuff untouched. Just go to www.newvision.com and use code 552522502 if you wish to purchase any oil.

Tyrus

 
 
 
Posted On Mar 22, 2007
So let me get this straight...

There's a growth factor in the whey portion of cow's milk that might trigger growth of cancerous cells in the human body.

And the good news is that RAW milk contains CLA which might protect consumers from the potentially cancer-stimulating substance in the very same milk.

Ummm, well why would one continue to consume the substance with the cancer-triggering growth hormone in the first place?  I just don't get it.

Nor do I get all the excitement about cow's milk.  Yes, the 'raw' bit I get and would be an advocate of.  But cow's milk - I don't get the point.  Surely if there's any milk we ought to be drinking, it ought to be human?

I mean if we hadn't domesticated cows, and before we had invented cups and buckets to collect their milk in, what are the chances that they'd have let us walk up to them in the wild and suckle like they let their calves suckle?  Or would a goat have done the same?  A deer?  Elephant?  Hmmm, unlikely.

And are we humans really smarter than Nature when we contemplate the nutrients and toxins of a white, slushy food stuff it clearly didn't intend us to consume beyond our formative years?  Maybe I'm wrong... but I'm not aware of another mammal on this planet which provides it's young with milk (whether it's own or that of another species) for more than it's initial growth phases - let alone it's entire life!

Does that observation, combined with the presence of growth factors (designed to help build a wobbly calf into a massive cow in a matter of months) which may stimulate cancer in us, not give you raw milk consumers and advocates SERIOUS pause for thought?

 
Sean Uisce
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 11/2006
Sean Uisce  
Replied

Witch Doctor
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 9/2006
Witch Doctor  
 
Posted On Mar 22, 2007
Sean - Your logic is somewhat compelling, and I have confronted this argument before.  Unfortunately, I don't know how long or how fast we've evolved to accomodate milk as a food source.  I look at it this way:

A search on milk and cancer rates provides a mixed back of results - I don't want to take Cordain's conclusions (which are highly speculative based on my reading of his work) in isolation or even as fact.

Since cow's milk supplies everything the suckling mammal needs to grow and thrive, it seems at least potentially to be a superfood.  It may have conferred a substantial advantage to those many societies that chose to use it, and have managed to reach the modern age doing quite well overall.

If we eliminate milk, we throw away one more source of nature's nutrition when it is already hard to find nutritious food.  Even if it has detriments, it may be a net boon to many people.

I don't comprehend the acid buffering argumant yet.  What is the pH of milk?  Do we really drink that much to place a sizeable buffering load on the body?  I know no one, personally, who drinks more than one cup  a day.  The old 4 cups per day seems a relic of the distant past (in my timeline), with so many alternative beverages available and sought after for decades now.  Do you ever see anyone ordering milk at a restaurant anymore?  People will look at you funny.  I just don't buy that argument, yet... Maybe us traditionally milk consuming countries are in fact acidifying our blood with something else.  Or, to borrow part of your discussion, maybe it's the West's well documented decreasing fat intake (for over 50 years now), including low fat milk, that is reducing our buffering capabilities. (I'm stretching my mind here - I don't know about acidic nutrient ash and fat buffering of.)

Duane




Witch Doctor
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 9/2006
Witch Doctor  
 
Posted On Mar 23, 2007
Cathy - thanks.  Maybe the high meat/dairy types are too busy eating/drinking (because the food is so good and so healthy), thereby breathing less and acidifying their blood.  I for one have learned to eat from my dogs.  If I succeed in ripping it from their mouth, I woof it down in one gulp.  They do likewise.  So I breathe plenty in the struggle, and alkalize.

Duane


Sean Uisce
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 11/2006
Sean Uisce  
 
Posted On Mar 24, 2007
Dhuane, good point about the potential superfood status of raw milk.  Today's world ain't what nature intended us to live in so we need superfoods.  Yet mammalian milk doesn't make sense to me because I don't see animals taking milk their entire lives. And there are other superfoods like Barley Grass, Wheat Grass...

And what of the proportion of proteins in cow milk compared to human milk?  Aren't they far greater?  If we're going to consume milk, wouldn't it be wiser to consume ape milk because it's (apparently) got very similar protein proportions to human milk?

Cathy, yes, there is much disagreement amongst blood-pH dudes... but I think the central thesis is agreed: what we consume affects our body's ability to maintain a healthy blood pH.

Threats to blood pH from food intake are more dangerous than changes triggered by breathing... the latter can be reversed quickly - the former take longer to process through the system and requires more resources.  It's the daily wearing down of alkaline buffers from persistent bad-eating that's the cause of problems it seems.

We could debate for days what criteria to apply to establish if the acid-base approach is 'scientific'.  All I can tell you is that when I had Live Blood Analysis my blood was a mess.  I shifted into an almost 100% alkali-ash forming diet and a year later my blood profile was simply stunning.  As were my energy levels, stamina, skin, eyes, hair...

Strictly speaking that's not scientific; but it's what happened to me.  And given that the proponents of the food plan I follow (not as strictly now I concede - social pressure to not eat that way is awesome!) each have bone densities of people half their age (and the guy's hair has regrown) I believe they've got a big chunk of The Truth.  Not the whole Truth... but a pretty good portion of it. But I can't prove that to you!


Sean Uisce
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 11/2006
Sean Uisce  
 
Posted On Mar 24, 2007
Duane, as I understand it, the pH of milk would be irrelevant... it's the pH of the materials within it that are delivered into your blood stream AFTER your digestive bacteria have worked on it and it's passed through the wall of your digestive tract.

So acidic fruits like lemons and limes contribute an alkaline ash to the bloodstream.  And counter-intuitively (ah, good, I got to use that word today!) some more basic foods can actually cause an acidic ash in the bloodstream which the body has to counteract in someway.

I'm no physician or scientist (although I try to be scientific!) but as regards the amount of milk one consumes and the demand it might put on buffering systems, well it seems to be down to the old chemistry law.  It takes 20 parts base to neutralise 1 part of acid (if both are of similar strength).  So one ounce of milk would require 20 ounces of a similar strength base to counteract it.

If you're also doing meat, sweet fruits, wheat, sugars, anger, fear, jealousy, toxic toiletries etc. on a regular basis like we do in the West, then there is a major drain/strain on alkali buffers.  And it's not simply a matter of "oh I had a bit of chocolate, I'll eat a lemon to balance it out"... it's more like 20 lemons you need.

Hope that helps you grasp the acid-base notion a bit better.


Miss Melissa
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 1/2007
Miss Melissa  
 
Posted On Mar 25, 2007
If you don't know anyone who consumes more than one cup of milk a day...

What about our toddlers?  Until about a year ago, my girls had at LEAST one cup of milk with each meal (they eat about 5-6 times a day).  Plus cheeses and yogurt throughout the day.  Cow's milk is very over-used with our children.  Actually, if you look at your toddler's diet, I would bet that dairy makes up over half of what they eat in one day. 

It wasn't until I read, "Super Immunity for Kids" that I realized that too much dairy can actually lead to vitamin deficencies, as well as other health problems.  Kids today are eating yogurts, hard cheeses, milk, cottage cheese, etc., WITH EVERY MEAL.  Watching my friends children eat dairy all day long, and seeing how they are sick all the time, I would bet that too much dairy has something to do with it.

And now this information about ph-levels--perhaps this is having a greater effect on our children than we realize.

I now carefully control and portion dairy products for my children and myself.  While they have many benefits, I truly am beginning to believe that we are all over-eating dairy products, which is attributing to many childhood and adult problems.

By the way, I was reading an article that showed an increase in osteoperosis in girls UNDER age 9.  The article encouraged parents to INCREASE dairy products as "the best" source of calcium, but I believe this line of thought is actually hurting our children.  There are plenty of other ways to get your daily calcium other then dairy.   

 
 
 
Posted On Mar 23, 2007
Hi, all of you that have easy access to Raw Milk should be very grateful. Here in NC we are lawbreakers and have to go underground to provide this delicious nutrition to our families. I do go to an organic dairy farm and get my milk, but it is strictly forbidden in NC to buy raw milk except- for "animal consumption" only. The government has the state of NC so scared it's not even funny. I sign petitions, write to my lawmakers etc, please, everyone in NC help to make raw milk more accessible to everyone. People are so brainwashed around here thinking big gov is taking care of us-yeah right!!!!

 
deltadawn
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 3/2007
deltadawn  
Replied

bookaholics.anon
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2006
bookaholics.anon  
 
Posted On Apr 03, 2007
It's also forbidden in our state, but we are next to two states that allow raw milk purchase. We go directly to the farm and buy 2 gallons a week. It's a pain to have to call the farmer and let him know we are coming, but it's a nice drive and we saw the cows, how they are raised (Mennonite farmers, forget hormones, you could eat off the barn floor in terms of how clean it is.) The milk is incredible and we don't get that indigestion and runny nose.


Bill McDougald
Novice User Novice User Joined On 1/2007
Bill McDougald  
 
Posted On Apr 13, 2007
Yes deltadawn, big government is not our friend, just a monopoly and no monopoly is good for the public. For information on 2 of the 4 elites who advise the 9 monopolies and control organized crime to get their way, see "ama, murder by injection".

Tyrus

 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.