SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
Another Tragic and Unnecessary Death

Four-year-old Rebecca Riley died late last year from an overdose of prescribed medications.

Rebecca was diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity and bipolar disorders, even though teachers and school nurses said they never saw her engage in behavior that warranted the potent drugs she was given.

Her parents, who have been arrested on murder charges for giving her the drugs, say they were only following their doctor's orders. They have accused Rebecca's psychiatrist, Kayoko Kifuji, of over-prescribing medication. Kifuji, in turn, claims that the parents increased Rebecca's dosage of drugs on their own, despite warnings that doing so would be dangerous.

However, when social workers met with the family's doctors not long before her death, they were assured that she was taking drugs at levels within medical guidelines.

USA Today March 24, 2007


Dr. Mercola's Comment:

This case of a 4-year-old who died from massive amounts of toxic drugs in her system is a devastating, real-world case of a health care system that medicates before thinking, no matter what the cost.

The drugs prescribed to Rebecca included Clonidine, Depakote, an antihistamine and cough suppressant. According to medical examiners, the amount of Clonidine found in Rebecca's system alone was enough to be fatal.

Rebecca's death was indeed tragic, but I view her experience as a metaphor for what is wrong with the entire conventional approach to medicine. It has morphed into a system that is optimized to train health care professionals in the belief system that drugs and surgery are the primary solution for nearly every one of our health challenges.

Was an overdose of drugs given to Rebecca by her parents? Was too much prescribed to her by her psychiatrist? These are not the right questions. What we should be asking is, why was this toxic cocktail of multiple drugs, at any dosage, being prescribed to a 4-year-old in the first place?

There are dozens of children like Rebecca who die EVERY day from similar circumstances in which they were given drugs that in no way, shape or form would ever address the underlying cause of their problem.

I firmly believe that the answer involves taking responsibility for yourself and family and Taking Control of Your Health. When a drug solution is offered to you think HARD about whether you really want to take that choice. Ideally you will want to move to the position where this is the last reasonable option and it is the lesser of two evils.

Be a skeptic. Double check everything you are told. You can certainly use my site as I have compiled over 100,000 free pages of information over the last 10 years, but don't stop there. Use Google and search many sites.

If the topic is important enough, spend a few hours surfing around so you can rule out some of the wackiness that is not properly peer-reviewed. After awhile you will develop a relatively clear consensus of the truth.

How?

It will start to make sense. Your body (more precisely your gut) will tell you you are on to something as it rings of truth. The only challenge you will have is to allow yourself to be OPEN to the concept that you might have been brainwashed for years or decades by "experts" that had no idea of the truth.

Trust yourself that you will recognize the truth when you see it.

If it doesn't sound right to you, keep on searching.

Related Articles:





 
 Do you find this article interesting?
Comment on This Article Community Comments (60)
 
 
Posted On Apr 14, 2007
Yes, we all know the medical establishment is broken.  But why were teachers and school nurses seeing a 4 year old in school?  Four years is a time when the child should be at home with her mother.  This case is as much a symptom of our societal breakdown as it is a medical failure. 

If the federal govt didn't take such a huge percentage of our wages less women would work and more would stay home. 

If feminism didn't tell women raising children has no value but work does, more women would stay home.

If men and women would stay married and take responsibility for their children's future and education, then 4 year olds would never be in a govt school to be exposed to the teacher and school nurses recommendation.  This is another great example of the reason for parents to be responsible for education and not the state.  This is another death that homeschooling would have prevented.

 
RZ
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 6/2006
RZ  
Replied

redrock
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 4/2007
redrock  
 
Posted On Apr 14, 2007
Why was a 4 year old seeing a psychiatrist anyway and on these drugs since 2 1/2 years old?
I did a remodel project and the 6 year old  in the house was on Ritalin. His parents said he was hyperactive and ADD among other things. I saw him pouring down liters of cola for breakfast. Candy and soda was available at any time he wanted it. I wonder what was causing the disorders? When a child can have these items when they want they will always take it.


Miss Melissa
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 1/2007
Miss Melissa  
 
Posted On Apr 14, 2007
I believe that mothers belong in the home as well.  I am blessed to be raising two toddlers, and it is more demanding than any job I have ever had!

I also believe that mothering plays an important role in health and recovery.  I think we are losing an important part of family bonding and parent/child relationships.  When parents can cover up their children's symptoms and still send them to school or daycare, they are, at the very core, neglecting their children.  Children are able to see when their parents put them off, especially when children are in need the most.

The CDC has listed that several vaccines are necessary "to save parents from losing valuable work time".  I think this is an unacceptable reason to mandate a vaccine.  We, as parents, and as a scoiety, have an obligation to care for our children.

While I, too, understand that many mothers have to work, I wish that every working mother would re-revaluate why she is working.  In most cases, families are actually losing money (not to mention health, relationships, and food preparation time) by having the mother work rather than manage the household. 

My mother has always worked full time, and has told us children it was because "she was bored at home".  That's like a slap in the face.  I have obese siblings who were fed convenience foods all growing up, in addition to being in day care all growing up.  They are lonely, unhealthy, and all they want in life is to spend time with our parents. 

This news story makes me ill.  I look at the picture of that baby girl and I just don't understand.


sweet melissa
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 2/2007
sweet melissa  
 
Posted On Apr 15, 2007
I have to agree that this seems to be a symptom of our society and family structure breaking down. I feel very fortunate that I am able to stay home with my 2 1/2 year old daughter. Many woman say that just can't do it for financial resoens but I believe if you want it bad enough you can make it work. I made the diciesion while I was pregnant that I was going to be their for my daughter just like my mother was for me. It wasn't easy. I went from working full time to realing sole on my husbands income. We strugled for several monthes and when it was getting really difficult I came up with the idea of doing in home daycare. Now we are much more financiaIy stable and I  can be home with my daughter and their when my teenage step children get home and give them the love and attention they needs as well as make a positive influnce in my community by helping to raise other peoples children with good morals, values and life habits. It a Win/Win situation for me and their is always a need for GOOD in home daycare, as unfortunatly many mothers and father must continue to work out side the home.


GGB
Novice User Novice User Joined On 10/2006
GGB  
 
Posted On Apr 15, 2007
http://www.kryptopyrrole.com/

Maybe this website can help .


psychodancer
Novice User Novice User Joined On 4/2007
psychodancer  
 
Posted On Apr 15, 2007
I take offense at people who assume that since I am a working parent that I am selfish and don't love and care for my child as much as stay-at- home-mothers.  I am a professional woman who chooses to work because it gives me a sense of satisfaction and fulfillment.  I also love my son very much.  I don't want to be a stay at home mother and I certainly would not do a good job as a homeschooling parent.    Nonetheless, I am home with my son every afternoon and spend a tremendous amount of quality time with him--more than some of the stay-at-home-mothers that I know.  Being a good parent isn't about staying home with your children.  Being a good parent is about how present you are with your children.   


Ferlie
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 12/2006
Ferlie  
 
Posted On Apr 15, 2007
Feminism doesn't tell women that raising children isn't a worthy job, nor does it say only work for pay is the way to go.  Feminism says that ANYTHING a woman CHOOSES to do of her own free and educated will is what she should do!  If a male dominated world is so good for children then why are they, and the women who bear them, in so much trouble in every society on our planet?  It's not a question of feminism being right or wrong, it's the crushing subjugation of more than half the world's population under male rule.  No offense to the wonderful, kind and intelligent men who read and post to these pages- but you are the ruling class no matter what your color or financial situation.  Please note that I am not saying women should rule the world- we are just as fallible as the male of our species in our own ways.  Balance is what is needed, not one over the other. 

Further, there are as many good ways to raise a child as there are parents on the planet.  If you want to be a stay-at-home parent, then do so.  If working outside the home is what pleases you, then do so.  The key is to be a happy, confident person and transmit your love and confidence to your children.  A miserable person is not a good role model no matter what societal "norm" they are conforming to, including "staying married for the children." 

I know a lot of parents- married, divorced, straight, gay, single, some who home school, some who stay home but send their kids to public or private schools and some who work outside the home and pretty much every variation thereof.  The kids who are happy and well adjusted are the ones with happy, well adjusted parents regardless of their income or job status, marriage situation or sexual orientation. 

So stop blaming and find the good and praise it!


KathyFP
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 6/2006
KathyFP  
 
Posted On Apr 15, 2007
It would be good for moms to be home, but it's a personal choice or a financial one.

I took my grandson to that hospital for his Post Traumatic Disorder, but I wanted education and understanding for him.  They wanted him on drugs.  When I refused, they yelled at me, sent him home, and turned me into the Child Protective Services for abuse by not letting him have Ritalin or the other poison pills.

We have to hurry and change the laws, or we'll all end up in jail for not drugging our children.  Yes, it's that bad right now.


minnie-me
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 2/2007
minnie-me  
 
Posted On Apr 15, 2007
Kathy, your story makes me nauseous! What is this country coming to??? If you didn't care about your grandson, you wouldn't have brought him in for help...I mean REAL help! So, you didn't want him all drugged up, and they turn YOU in for abuse! This is exactly what would have happened to Rebecca's parents had they refused to drug this 4 year old. They did what they were directed to do, and now she's dead. As if it can't get any worse, the blame is put on them ... and the Medical system comes out of this looking like the good guy.  
Well, she isn't the first sacrificial lamb and she won't be the last. So now they want to screen every teengager for mental health so that they can prescribe more drugs. When the accidental death and suicide rate continues to rise among our children, they'll find some other excuse because it CAN'T be the drugs...I don't know what else to say....


TheWritingMuse
Novice User Novice User Joined On 4/2007
TheWritingMuse  
 
Posted On Apr 16, 2007
Feminism, moms being home with their children and staying married are not the issues here. The issue is that the medical establishment looks for a quick fix and presciption meds are the only thing they know. It's sickening how easily a doctor will prescribe a drug regardless of what you tell them.
My mother is battling cancer and she has a handful of meds that she takes....most of them are to combat the side effects of the other. This list includes Ativan, something the doctor thought he would prescribe to her because she was 'anxious'. Well, now she is absolutely 'stoned' on the meds, she is confused, flaccid, unmanageable, and has no appetite...but she can sleep! Well, that's wonderful that she can sleep, but what about her nutrition? What about her making choices for herself?
We so blindly believe what a doctor has to say because we think they know it all when in fact they have no clue either.
Our family has lost control of the whole prescibed meds situation and are now taking it back by educating ourselves and finding other ways of helping my mother through this difficult time.
It's time we start using our own ability to think and rationalize. We have the resources, let's use them.


hypoxic
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 9/2006
hypoxic  
 
Posted On Apr 16, 2007
I am so glad I decided not to put my son on ritalin. Despite his kinderarten teachers and his pediatrians strong and repetative instistance. He was just fine without it. It took alot of hard work and patience to fight the teachers and school. I had to fight for my son and I am so glad I didnt give up on him.  This is a prime example of parents simply not wanting to be parents. Whether you choose to sedate your child, put them in front of the tv play video games, or leave them with someone you are just giving up on them.
 
Have these parents ever heard of the "terrible two's"? Why would you take your typical tamtrum throwing, active little two year old to a psychiatrist? These people should be charged with murder along with thier doctor. This is sick.


jupiter2
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 4/2007
jupiter2  
 
Posted On Apr 16, 2007
RZ you are so right.  When will western society realise that bringing up the next generation as a proper mother,  i.e. staying at home and being there for them, is the most important career in the world.  Nothing else can compare - and if you have to go short of a few technical gizmos, so what?  At least you can hold your head up with some pride.  Here in the UK, silly women go out to work because they believe they are "unfulfilled" if they don't.  They then have to pay out three quarters of what they earn to childminders.  I am referring here to women with partners, not women who have been bereaved or divorced.  I wonder what the reasoning was to bear a child in the first place if they can't stand being with them.


ryree
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 6/2006
ryree  
 
Posted On Apr 16, 2007
I had my first child when I was 19. Lucky for me I was raised organic and taught to let your body heal naturally. It also helped that I was never sick. I decided to breastfeed and at one point in my hospital stay a nurse handed me a small pill with no explanation. Just take this. I almost did(being young and feeling like they should know) but waited until the next nurse came in and asked what it was for. She said that was to stop my breast milk. They just assumed I was bottle feeding. (I think they stopped giving this pill after it caused deaths or several new mothers)    It was always a battle when it came to getting them immunized. They made me feel like I was breaking a law, that I had no choice. I allowed the first set but not until they were 4 years old. After that I found I didn't have to subject my children to this poison. My son was bored in school so I was constantly given wrong information about giving him Ritalin. The doctor I took him to gave him a 5 minute physical and said he needed it based on the teacher's recommendation. I told him next time my child needed a medical diagnosis I would consult the teacher then. Needless to say he never received the Ritalin that they wanted to use as a training aid. The expert advice I found out said children should go through all kinds of tests to rule out any other problems(not a five minute physical)they also said Ritalin does not train a child to act better so they can eventually be taken off of it like they tried to convince me. Ask questions, do your own research, trust your feelings.  
I believe those were bad parents to begin with. They probably liked the fact the child remained "zombie like." Everyone else assumed the doctors must be right about what they are doing. You have to put blame on all of them.  


tinkerbell520
Novice User Novice User Joined On 4/2007
tinkerbell520  
 
Posted On Apr 16, 2007
First of all I have to say that I completely agree with psychodancer and ferlie when it comes to being working parents as opposed to being stay at home moms.  I think it was very brave of psychodancer to write that she doesn't think she'd be good as a home school teacher.  If you think about it not many moms today would be very qualified.  Maybe for the first few years and a little into elementary, but can you honestly say that you, as a stay-at-home mom can teach your kids the skills they'd need to even pass for a high school education?

Also how dare you say that for those moms who choose to work are being selfish and aren't being very good mothers to their children.  My mom was a working mom all my life and yes it was definitely financial, but also a personal choice.  And I'm sorry but there was no way that our family could have survived financially if she hadn't worked.  She has been the bread winner from day one and I am also coming into that situation where I am going to have to be a working mother.  As much as I would like to be at home with my baby (when he's born) my husband and I won't financially make it if I don't work. 

Whether you choose one way or the other there really is no right way.  It's all about how you spend the time you do have with your children.  Like I said I was raised in a household where both parents worked, but in no way did I ever feel neglected and I have a closer relationship with my mom than most of my friends do whose mothers didn't work.  I can only name one friend that I have, who had a stay-at-home mother, that is as close to her mom as I am with mine.  It just goes to show that you can't be judgemental on those of us that choose to work instead of stay at home with our kids.  Some of us are great stay-at-home mothers and some of us are not.  It's all about making the right decision for your children.  There's no one way.


Witch Doctor
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 9/2006
Witch Doctor  
 
Posted On Apr 16, 2007
ryree - I wish I had your intelligence when I was 19, or even 30 years old.  You were given a gift in being able to deal so well with experts and conventional thinking, knocking out their advanced education with your no-nonsense common sense.  I sometimes feel I want to have kids again, what with what I've learned, and inspiration from courageous people like you who can see through the educational veneer of educators, nurses, doctors, etc...  Thank you.  Duane


jstarr
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 12/2006
jstarr  
 
Posted On Apr 16, 2007
Taking the tragic murder of a child as an opportunity to bash working parents, schools, and daycares is ignorant. If you bothered to read into this story at all you would have learned a few important facts:

1) The parents were monsters. Both parents and ALL of their children were on a cocktail of psychiatric medications...at the parents' insistence. No doc should have prescribed these meds, but it certainly wasn't at the behest of all of the evil school nurses and teachers out there conspiring to drug our children. The father was awaiting trial on charges of raping a child under the age of 13 and was not supposed to be living with any of the children at the time of this girl's death. In DSS reports her mother was observed to be "drugged and out of it." Several family members who only in hidsight realized that they witnessed this child die a slow horrible death over several days had pleaded with her parents to take her to a hospital. According to the affidavits of the parents, the father's idea of discipline was to medicate the children.

2) The teachers and school nurses that you are so quick to vilify were probably the only chance this child had of surviving. They were the ones questioning why this little girl was being prescribed powerful psychological drugs when she displayed no symptoms of behavioral or psychological problems. The school nurse called the doctor to express her concerns and the prescribing physician assured her that she was following legal, medical protocol. It was the school that called DSS (Department of Social Services) over the medication, the neglect (this child was send to school with summer clothes on in the middle of a New England winter).

The medical community & DSS failed this child, they should have been able to save her from her own parents. This little girl would not be alive if she were homeschooled. She would have been an easier target for her parents.

JS, Massachusetts


helpingheart
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 6/2006
helpingheart  
 
Posted On Apr 16, 2007
This is to KathyFP -

What state do you live in?  I'm in total shock of what they did to you.  You should get a lawyer from your Local Legal Aid.  You and your grandson have civil rights that are being violated!  Do an online search/or phone book search of the free Legal Aid in your area and make an appointment, there is help out there!

Please let us know, we care.

 
 
 
Posted On Mar 26, 2007
The sad thing is this: most MD's are sold on Rx meds and they know little to nothing about them, their side affects, etc. They are met by a Sales Rep (who most of the time has NO medical background) who shows them a 1 hr Power Point presentation on all the ups of the drug and is given pads of paper, tissue boxes, pens, candy, etc for showing up. Then these MD's go off and prescribe these meds left and right so the hospital keeps getting the $$$ backing from the large Rx medical companies. It is not about health, it is about sleeping in bed with one another.

The other sad thing besides knowing very little about the meds, most do not know their interactions with other meds. YOu have people seeing many doctors at once, getting different Rx meds from each one of them and none of them even communicate.

As a practitioner, I have clients come in to my office on up to 15 drugs sometimes. As well, most of the time half of them are contra-indicated to take with another they are taking and their MD's are not even talking with one another. This is when the risk of serious injury and death are inevitable.

The more sick our society gets and the more $$ hungry the medical community gets, I hate to say it but the more deaths by Rx meds we will see in the future. Yes it is the MD's, Rx medical companies, etc fault, but society needs to wake up as well.

 
Josh Rubin
Moderator User Moderator User, Joined On 6/2006
Josh Rubin  
Replied

minnie-me
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 2/2007
minnie-me  
 
Posted On Mar 26, 2007
 Sad, isn't it? But there are a few good ones out there. My daughter is due to deliver a baby boy any day. She asked me to help her find a good Ped who will back her on her decision to not vaccinate. It took a few interviews, but she found a gem!  Not only does this Dr. agree that vaccines can harm more than protect many children, she is also concerned about diet. She told her that good health and immunity comes from proper diet and nutrition, not vaccines! She also said that if my daughter cannot breastfeed, then she would put the baby on a rice based formula...NO MILK! She never treats children with drugs when they can be avoided, which is most of the time. ADD etc. is controlled by diet. She said that she has never had a child in her practice who has "become" autistic and her goal is to keep it that way. 
She said that when they travel with their two sons to Nigeria and certain other foreign countries, their food allergies disappear until they return to the States. It's obviously the food additives, etc. that are making our children sick, and she is not afraid to acknowledge this. BTW, she warned her that  "other Doctors" in the practice don't necessarily share her views.... Seems like she's one in a million! Thumbs up to this Doc!!!!                                         

 
 
 
Posted On Mar 26, 2007
MD's are human, and therefore mortal, and therefore fallible, just like the rest of us.

The reactive model MD's have been trained under, is also flawed.

The prescription of unsafe, bad, or deadly side effects drugs on the market, that do more harm than good, is PANDEMIC.

The solution?  Seek any and all alternative and less evasive treatments; not surgery, or drug regiments, if at all possible.

The current America health care system is BROKEN on so many levels, as to be a walking (or staggering), corpse, in many respects.
 
Do not end up another statistic, if you do not have to.

 
Russ Bianchi
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 9/2006
Russ Bianchi  
Replied

annapavlova42
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 2/2007
annapavlova42  
 
Posted On Mar 26, 2007
Do these MD's, not have minds of their own.  No excuses for anyone, trained or other wise.  Pure common sense.

 
 
 
Posted On Mar 26, 2007
 Yes the medical system is broken. This again highlights the lack of knowledge that doctors have about the CYP450 enzyme system that deals with metabolism of drugs, alcohol and certain foods. Most of them haven’t even heard of it, much less realise it is an issue. Many drugs and foods are either substrates (broken down by), inhibitors or inducers of these enzyme systems, which is why cocktails of OTC and prescription drugs can be so deadly.

BUT to be fair, now big Pharma controls the so-called evidence-based medicine guidelines, THEY get to write the rules. When Mrs Bloggs goes to her MD with high cholesterol, the guidelines state that he must prescribe a statin. If he doesn’t he could be sued. So like puppets on a string, they dance to big Pharma’s tune to the detriment and death of their patients.
Anyone taking prescription drugs can check on the link below to see if there is any likelihood of drug-drug or food-drug interactions. But be aware that this table is not comprehensive, and is frequently updated.
http://medicine.iupui.edu/flockhart/table.htm


 
PPARGammaGirl
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 6/2006
PPARGammaGirl  
Replied

Witch Doctor
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 9/2006
Witch Doctor  
 
Posted On Mar 26, 2007
Cathy - I believe both grapefruit and resveratrol can tie up the CYP450 enzyme system.  Of course there's afamily of those, so I don't know which ones are tied up.  The result is potentially dangerous elevations of some drugs in the body (that are metabolized via that pathway).  I'm sure you know this, but I'm reinforcing your point.  I do take resveratrol, so I take it in the morning, and my meds before bed, for this reason.  The drug interactions with resveratrol are not characterized yet, so are theoretical - but lots of people are taking high doses of it.  My meds are metabolized by CYP450A.  I also have to be careful with grapefruit juice, and I learned that by experience!

Good post. (Not mine - yours.)

Duane


lindalaveck
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 4/2007
lindalaveck  
 
Posted On Apr 14, 2007
 Like one of the other posters on this page, I too am on a personal campaign to convince people to improve their health through improved diets.

This thread discussing the effects of 'grapefruit' on medications because of the enzyme issues includes the following comment: "Scientists believe it is the bergamottin in grapefruit that blocks the CYP450 3A4,5 and 7 pathways. Bergamottin is also present in many other fruits, so they also have the potential to block this pathway"

So what I hear in this statement is that eating fruit, in general, will cause health problems if you are taking meds. The logical conclusion of this effect of fruits on meds is to not eat fruits or it could be deadly. (if you are taking meds)

There is something seriously wrong with this picture. Fruit is a vital part of eating a healthy diet, one that will build your immune system, keep your bodily systems working properly, and reduce the obesity in so many people that have many health problems. I shall continue my campaign to get my friends and loved ones off drugs and into a healthier way of eating.


kfarias_203
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 6/2006
kfarias_203  
 
Posted On Apr 14, 2007
How can you travel to other countries without being vaccinated for diseases that are only found over there?  Such as malaria?  Isn't it required in some countries? My father was in the Air Force,when we traveled abroad it was required that we get shots.

 
 
 
Posted On Apr 14, 2007
What a tragedy! You are right - Rebecca should have never been prescribed those drugs in the first place. Drugs are not the way to treat kids. My husband and I stay clear of drugs now. We just give our kids NingXia Red, which  boosts their immune system and helps prevent them from health problems in the first place. We also try to make sure they eat healthy and are active. If they do get a mild cold, we give them an extra dose of NingXia Red combined with orange juice to boost their immune system so that their bodies can fight off the viruses without the need of drugs. Drugs should not be given to kids!

Live healthy and help your kids do the same!
Mirdza
Helping People Lead Healthier Lives

 
healthstar
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 3/2007
healthstar  
Replied

True Health
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 10/2006
True Health  
 
Posted On Apr 14, 2007
This whole scenario reeks.
1.  Why was a 4 year old girl in school in the first place?
2.  How did teachers and nurses get involved so early in this childs life?
3.  Who in the world suggested that this little girl needed a psychiatrist?  Wouldn't the parents be better candidates?
4.  How could any psychiatrist believe that prescribing such powerful drugs could benefit such a young and fragile child?
5.  And many more on the imbecilic stupidity of this whole case.

I find them all personally guilty and responsible for this childs early demise.  This is total insanity to anyone with a lick of sense.

Dr. Brack Callahan


Miss Melissa
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 1/2007
Miss Melissa  
 
Posted On Apr 14, 2007
By the way, as a young mother, I see first hand the growing trend of "preschool" for children starting as young as 18 months old.

I think parents have been duped into daycare establishments promoting themselves as "learning centers" (if they employ at least one certified teacher, they can advertise this way).  I think preschool should be saved for preschool age (5-6 years).

Parents who are truly looking for educational opportunites for their children can do thousands of activities and have meaningful experiences with their children in their own home.  I've heard recent news that the relationship of a child at age 2 with her parents can be directly linked to their relationship at age 16.  Thus, if you wait until the teenage years to develop a bond with your kids, you're too late. 

Children learn the most from the adults they spend the most time with during the day--this should overwhelmingly be their parents. 


 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.