SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
Processed Foods Are Even Sweeter Than You Think

Food companies have doubled the amount of sugar they add to many of their products. Soups, cereals, and other foods have been heavily sweetened to attract more customers.

Breakfast cereals have seen some of the biggest increases, but even whole grain bread now routinely contains almost a teaspoon of sugar in every three slices.

In 1978, Kellogg's Special K contained about 10 grams of sugar for every 100 grams of cereal, but that amount has now increased to 17 grams, very close to the sugar level of vanilla ice cream. Over the same period, the sugar per 100 grams in tomato soup has increased from less than 3 grams to more than 6 grams.

Processed foods contain some of the highest sugar content, often with levels close to or higher than 20 grams of sugar per 100 grams of food.

Sugar consumption has been implicated in rising levels of tooth decay, diabetes, and obesity.

Times Online May 6, 2007

Daily Mall May 6, 2007


Dr. Mercola's Comment:

You may not realize that we are in the midst of a diabetic epidemic; one in every three people in the United States either has diabetes or pre-diabetes.

This interesting report in the Sunday Times may explain, in part, why the incidence of diabetes and obesity have grown to epidemic proportions. Based on analysis that compared nutritional data reported in the UK's The Composition of Foods, processed food manufacturers have doubled the amount of sugar in their harmful products.

Clearly this is not the only issue as we also have a pandemic of exercise deficiency syndrome. Most people simply are not getting enough exercise and as such have decreased insulin receptor sensitivity. Please do review my latest thoughts on exercise from last week's newsletter.

You want to avoid or seriously limit sugar, though, as it causes your body to produce more insulin, which then blocks leptin, a hormone that normally tells the body when it is appropriate to stop eating. Processed foods are typically loaded with sugars and will fool your brain into believing that it is hungry; this, in turn, drives you to consume more calories and conserve energy.

The result is a worsening cycle of sugar consumption that floods your system with insulin and ravages your body.

Reversing the health-harming ratio of processed foods you typically eat -- 90 percent for most people -- is one of the key principles to achieving high levels of health while keeping diabetes and obesity away, not to mention cancer. Even in these time-challenged times of ours, you should strive to consume 90 percent of your foods raw, while keeping in mind your body's unique nutritional type.

Another effective way to avoid processed foods that litter grocery stores everywhere: Find local and safer organic sources for your whole foods.

Related Articles:





 
 Do you find this article interesting?
Comment on This Article Community Comments (47)
 
 
Posted On May 07, 2007
In additional to cancer triggering refined sugars (cane or beet sucrose, corn dextrose, HFCS, crystalline fructose, falsely/illegally labeled refined sucrose as 'evaporated cane juice', etc.), that can also lead to hypoglycemia, Syndrome X, diabetes, cardio vascular disease, & obesity, even claims of vitamin & minerals fortification are a FRAUD (in terms of ANY bioavailability, or absorbability). 

Among MANY real (non urban legend) breakfast cereal stories, I have personally heard, seen, or witnessed, is the one about three sources of CALCIUM for fortification in a breakfast cereal targeting bone needs for women.  There were three sources considered: ground rock or chalk (calcium carbonate), ground oyster shells, or actually absorbable dairy derived calcium.

Which one is still in that cereal brand?   Ground chalk at a 'window dressing' (trace amounts) levels.

When the corporate buyer was asked why they were not using the best one (dairy) at a real dosage level, he replied: "Cost".

When further pressed what would happen if the public found out?  He replied, "Maybe we'll switch".

False representations in children's Saturday morning, or weekday afternoon, TV programming, that these cereal brands "are part of a this complete breakfast" (showing an image of a bowl of their glorified puffed sugar & refined grains, next to real fruit, eggs, toast, a pitcher of milk, or real orange juice,) deceptively trying to fool the children into thinking any of these brands are wholesome, is EVIL.

This is but one example of why 'cereal is NOT for breakfast anymore' & why America has voted with their wallets & feet to healthier, or different, options. 

Such options include Starbuck's for a caffeine hit, or a much healthier energy/meal replacement bar, like Dr. Mercola's Cocoa Cassava Bars, that are: 'Truly Delicious & Absolutely Nutritious(TM)!

 
Russ Bianchi
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 9/2006
Russ Bianchi  
Replied

Russ Bianchi
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 9/2006
Russ Bianchi  
 
Posted On May 07, 2007
In 1905 in America, we were typically an agrarian population, with a huge influx of European immigrants coming to our shores. 

Primary diseases like polio, typhoid, and influenza, killed us younger, on an actuarial curve, but the population also consumed REAL and UNPROCESSED food or beverages. 

The average consumption of refined sugars (cane sucrose, fruit derived, maple or honey) back then, was about 6 pounds per year per person.

Today, our life expectancy in America is LONGER (though children for the first time are being projected not to have longer life expectancies) & generally speaking, primary diseases do not  enter into the equation of mortality in our population, primarily consuming highly processed food & beverages.

HOWEVER, we have more diabetes, hypoglycemia, cardio vascular disease, cancer, & obesity, than at any time in our country's history, some 102 years later.

The USDA claims, according to it's behind the curve/sandbagged statistics, we on average in America are consuming EACH about 153 pounds per year per person of refined sweeteners (cane & beet sucrose, corn fructose, High Fructose Corn Syrup, corn dextrose, corn maltodextrins/starches, that are technically not counted as sugars, honey, maple, fruit juices, etc.) 

This USDA number fails to take into account also polyol/alcohol distilled or high intensity sweeteners, which are technically non-caloric in assignment.

The BOTTOM LINE is the American pallet has been artificially sweetened through processed food & beverage, bulking with sweeteners, because after air, water & salt, it is the cheapest cost source ingredient, to make PROFIT in brands, irrespective of HARM or DEATH, triggered in those consuming such products.

We recommend reading: 'FAT LAND: How America Became The Most Obese Nation' by Greg Critser, for further overt dumbing-down explanation of the food chain.


cheftodd
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 4/2007
cheftodd  
 
Posted On May 07, 2007
Russ do you think that we could slap these guys with a burnt up beef brisket, and get their attention?


proatc
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 12/2006
proatc  
 
Posted On May 07, 2007
Russ,
You have to be careful with your statements, some sick, twisted individual is going to take your more than true statements, and twist them into saying; "Sweeteners are making us live longer.  So what if we have diabetes, obesity, cancer etc, we are no longer dyeing from polio, typhoid or influenza like we did over 100 years ago before HFCS, its a trade off but we are living longer due to good Westernized medicine!"
People still aren't going to get it, sad really.


Russ Bianchi
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 9/2006
Russ Bianchi  
 
Posted On May 07, 2007
Protac:

The "They" are ALREADY twisting, manipulating, and spinning the facts.  

"They" are arguing we are living longer, and therefore all the more reason to consume dumb-downed, nutrient void, refined sugar laden, hydrogenated and trans fat laced, (etc.) synthetic products....it's called a Breakfast Cereal TV Commercial.

Without giving the empirical background on how we as a country got to this sorry state of affairs, in the name of fast bucks and profiteering off the health of the nation (knowingly), we open ourselves up to be discredited.

IN POINT OF FACT, as you already know, it is through vetted and FULL DISCLOSURE venues like Vital Votes, we change the knowledge base for all consumers, so each of "them" may make their own  informed decisions, to improve and take care of their own health.

"And the TRUTH shall set us (each) free",

Uncle Russ


Russ Bianchi
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 9/2006
Russ Bianchi  
 
Posted On May 07, 2007
Chef Todd:

How long before Homeland Security puts frozen raw, or burnt, Omaha Steaks on the 'No Fly List'?

When burnt steaks are outlawed, only out laws will have burnt steaks?

Weapons of mass burnt destruction...?

Carbonate the enemy? Buy them a Liquid Smoke Gift Certificate?

Is Al Queda really behind the Ruth Chris Steak chain?

Burning at the stake, remains fatal to take?

;-)

Uncle Russ







cheftodd
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 4/2007
cheftodd  
 
Posted On May 07, 2007
Well Russ, I think after one of the yahoos reads this, it will not be long before there is a no fly steak zone!


Fer
Novice User Novice User Joined On 2/2007
Fer  
 
Posted On May 24, 2007
Russ!!!

What's wrong with dehydrated cane juice?  I've gone so out of my way to eliminate the bad sweeteners out of our diets.  We keep raw honey, organic pure maple syrup and Rapadura composted sugar cane in stock.  And I go out of my way to only buy "treats" that have dehydrated cane juice in them rather than conventional, refined sugar.  I know all sugars are bad for insulin levels, but is dehydrated cane juice not even a healthier alternative AT ALL?  :)

Please give me the scoop on this!  I love reading your posts!

- Fer
(mom to two wonderful little girls)


david
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 8/2006
david  
 
Posted On May 26, 2007
Cheftod....you cannot be serious?!
"I was eating 8to 10 oz of grilled tuna(leftovers), oatmeal,steamed chicken breast(8oz) with rice and a veg. 6to8 eggs very over easy(.bananas ) apples,sometimes cheese. alot of garlic,chopped onion,fresh herbs.if I have any ginger it is in there also.beef sometimes. and shreaded wheat(but have not eaten this in a while)coffee also."
6 to 8 eggs?...over-eating big time eh?:)
 

 
 
 
Posted On May 07, 2007
Now isn't that a kick in the head? I did not know that the sugar content of so-called "unsweetened" cereals had been increased since I was a kid - what is wrong with these manufacturers?  Are they doing it because Americans, with their sugar-burdened taste buds, can't taste smaller amounts of sugar anymore and won't buy cereals with less sugar? 

I was aware that there is too much sugar in these cereals, because I read labels fanatically, and my kids were never allowed cereals that had huge amounts of sugar and almost no fiber, including seemingly innocent varieties such as rice krispies, but the average ignorant citizen who believes the television ads about "heart health" yada yada yada is not going to know this.

What hope is there when even the WIC program allows junk cereals, like sugar-coated Frosted Mini-Wheats, but not unadulterated Shredded Wheat, and the USDA Food Pyramid still recommends more grain and other starchy food than most people can tolerate?

I'm very sad and worried for my childrens' and grandchildrens' generations.      

 
mimi2seven
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 4/2007
mimi2seven  
Replied

wassily
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 4/2007
wassily  
 
Posted On May 08, 2007
'unadulterated Shredded Wheat' - hmmm ....what about before it's 'shredded' .....

 
 
 
Posted On May 07, 2007
Sugar, besides displacing healthy calories, and causing largely insulin driven disease states, has another problem.  It is an anti-nutrient.  Why do I say this?  The body has to use up vital nutrients in converting it to glucose, producing insulin, pumping sugar into cells,  burning the sugar in multiple steps for energy, converting it to glycogen, burning said glycogen, converting it to triglycerides, mobilizing and burning said triglycerides (does that involve a ketone step, too?).  Every step in it's myriad and multi-step journeys use up the body's nutrients.  This is stuff I've read but am not expert in, so I outlined it generally.  Perhaps others can elucidate some of the nutrients, of which I know there are many, that get consumed.  Oh, and then the body has to do something with the insulin after it's done it's job.  Then add the damage, and subsequent repair processes necessary, due to prolonged elevated insulin exposure.  And how about glycation end-products, with proteins and fats, I believe.  Yikes!  Sugar is a MAJOR antinutrient!  That means instead of adding nutrients, or even just being neutral, it consumes many nutrients leaving you more depleted than before.  Did I get anything wrong?  Some oxidation/reduction steps, maybe?  Oh, yeah - disposal of waste products from all of the above, etc., etc., etc. (said like Yul Brynner in The King and I.)

 
Witch Doctor
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 9/2006
Witch Doctor  
Replied

Witch Doctor
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 9/2006
Witch Doctor  
 
Posted On May 07, 2007
Let's not forget that sugar feeds yeast, which then multiply - divide and conquer sounds better - which then DEMAND MORE SUGAR, or there'll be hell to pay!  That's right - they'll dump toxins (aldehydes) in your blood stream, giving you brain fog and making you feel like cr@p, until they get their sugar FIX!  They are now in control.  Your sunk.  Low carb hurts at first, if the yeast are in charge of your body, but trillions of yeast will die a painful death and you will be left standing and back in control!


KathieJamisonCote
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 4/2007
KathieJamisonCote  
 
Posted On May 24, 2007
Hey WitchDoctor - How are you?  Great Point.  Sugar is Deadly!

Yeast Overgrowth is just beginning to be recognized by some MD's (helllooo)  -Candida Albicans - 85% percent of Americans suffer from this......and this intruder masks itself as many different symptoms such as:  headaches, mood swings, depression, fibromyalgia, lethargy, bladder infections, colic, dandruff, athlete's foot, thrush, food sensitivities,anxiety, low blood sugar, sensitivities to perfume, cigarettes, fabric odors and learning and behavior disabilities.............seems to me there should be A LOT more MD's prescribing "SUGAR DELETION FROM DIET" than drugs and pills for the above mentioned conditions.  And guess what - removing sugar from the diet has NO SIDE EFFECTS!  (ahhh - well maybe a headache for a couple of days........., but can't I get a pill for that?)

WHITE REFINED SUGAR IS POISON............and should be avoided always.  Anything poisonous that we put into our bodies only ages us and depletes our life.

And Katybr55 - You are so right about how frustrating it can be to get loved ones and friends to "see the light".  It just isn't happening with some in my life :(             
........but don't forget to revel in the people you do help see the viability of what you are saying and be very thankful (although I'm sure you are) that you have been enlightened to know the truth.........others will follow our leads..........I'm  thankful I've a 17 year jump on it and that our children have grown up with this knowledge of health. 

Blessings everyone....... 

 
 
 
Posted On May 07, 2007
This is how the food industry keeps kids and adults addicted to these foods. They add lots of various sugars and gluten (Which interact with the brain to create gluteomorphines. Which when you are low or try to come off, you essentially have withdrawals. Hence you always want these foods.) to keep you addicted to these foods. As well, the lower quality the food, the more it is dead and processed, the more they have to add and do to it to make it eatable!

 
Josh Rubin
Moderator User Moderator User, Joined On 6/2006
Josh Rubin  
Replied

cheftodd
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 4/2007
cheftodd  
 
Posted On May 07, 2007
Josh, so they are just as bad as the crack pushing drug cartels. put a needle in your arm or keep eating this highly addictive junk, in the end it spells death .      not good!


Josh Rubin
Moderator User Moderator User Joined On 6/2006
Josh Rubin  
 
Posted On May 07, 2007
Chef todd,
I am not sure of the time line and cannot remember where sugar was discovered (india maybe?). I watched a show on it, but somehow can't recall it at this point. But back in the day when it was discovered it was actually called crack! I am not kidding!


cheftodd
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 4/2007
cheftodd  
 
Posted On May 07, 2007
if that don't beat all.  I didn't see this coming. 

 
 
 
Posted On May 07, 2007
This post was deleted because it violated our Terms Of Use :
Comment does not pertain to the topic of the article or does not provide value or insight to the discussion. Submit stories or comments linking to affiliate programs, multi-level marketing schemes, or off-topic content or any other system that will result in your personal financial or commercial gain.

 
Katy B
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 3/2007
Katy B  
Replied

wassily
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 4/2007
wassily  
 
Posted On May 08, 2007
'living longer'  ???   'dying longer' more like

 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.