SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
How Much Did it REALLY Cost Drug Companies to Pay Off Congress?

If you still have doubts about the influence drug companies have on Capitol Hill, you'll be as alarmed as I am about this USA Today report that tracked donations from the cartel to Congressmen that may have influenced their decisions in killing a measure last week that would've allowed drug imports into America.

The 49 senators who voted down the drug importation measure have received $5 million from drug executives and related political action committees over the past six years, representing almost 75 percent of the industry's donations to current Senate members. And, one legislator who claimed he was responsible for introducing an amendment that limited the FDA's authority to require post-market studies had received $168,500 in donations from drug companies.

However, that Congressman didn't even make the top 10 list when it came to campaign donations from drug companies. The top five Senators, all of whom voted in favor of killing drug importation legislation, and the amounts they received from the drug cartel:

  • Richard Burr (R-N.C.) $520,694
  • John Kerry (D-Mass.) $304,888
  • Joe Lieberman (I-Vt.) $281,040
  • Arlen Spector (R-Pa.) $259,699
  • Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) $241,850

The only no vote among the list of top 10 Senators receiving funds from drug interests was, surprisingly, number 6 on the list: Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) at $216,599 and one of the disappointing few fighting for serious FDA reform.

All the more reason you shouldn't wait around for the FDA or anybody else to create a slightly better illusion of drug safety when you can take better responsibility for your own health, without useless and potentially toxic drugs.

USA Today May 11, 2007






 
 Do you find this article interesting?
Comment on This Article Community Comments (11)
 
 
Posted On May 16, 2007
I've been following the progress of S. 1082 since it was introduced. Its progress through the Senate was far slower than anticipated because of the furore it created among the public (and thanks to all of you Mercola fans who contacted your legislators!) The Fat Lady hasn't sung yet because it still has to make an appearance in the House where we will have another opportunity to overwhelm our representatives with a cascade of protests...but I think the future looks grim. We in Maine will have to continue to charter busses to Canada to get our pricier prescriptions filled more affordably. Meanwhile our lawmakers are living off the fat of the land - thanks to Big Pharma contributions.

P.S. When  they say it's not about the money...it's about the money.

 
Islander
Moderator User Moderator User, Joined On 3/2007
Islander  
Replied

Bridestein
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 12/2006
Bridestein  
 
Posted On May 16, 2007
Since Canadians come here for diagnostic testing and surgery, and we go there for drugs, maybe we could work something out!



Sheila C
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 1/2007
Sheila C  
 
Posted On May 19, 2007
But we would gladly trade our drugs for organic food.  Just kidding.  I don't know why you Americans are not more incensed at the corruption going on in your government?  Get out there and vote and try to make changes instead of just "taking it".  Dr. Mercola, by having this site I believe you are having a great impact.
Our Prime Minister Stephen Harper in reply to a reporter questioning him about the quality of our food on our shelves, said his government is concerned about the long term effect that these products have on our health, specifically heart disease and cancer.  Has your President said anything like this?

 
 
 
Posted On May 16, 2007
Hmmmm, I guess Congressman Grassley get less donations, or is doubled-up on donations, if Big Pharma needs his vote?

 
Russ Bianchi
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 9/2006
Russ Bianchi  
 
 
 
Posted On May 16, 2007
This post was deleted because it violated our Terms Of Use :
Comment does not pertain to the topic of the article or does not provide value or insight to the discussion. Submit stories or comments linking to affiliate programs, multi-level marketing schemes, or off-topic content or any other system that will result in your personal financial or commercial gain.

 
Katy B
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 3/2007
Katy B  
Replied

Patri
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 3/2007
Patri  
 
Posted On May 17, 2007
KatyB. - no, no, NO Katy!  A good upstanding American-Dream congressman taking bribes??  Why, those were  d o n a t i o n s !  (snigger)

It's the rename game!  ;>D

Hah!...and those figures reflect donations from only one industry.

(Ummm, someone correct me here please - I read somewhere that -in America-  the single, greatest collection of multi-millionaires present together at one time is when Congress is in session.)

Being a politician anywhere in the world is a lucrative business, I should think.  But I suspect in the US, the payoffs - errr 'donations' are the most generous due to the available wealth and being the seat of major industries.

Shame on them all but especially John Kerry - who clearly doesn't need it...or was he 'donating' it to worthy causes??  ;>)


Patri
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 3/2007
Patri  
 
Posted On May 17, 2007
@Gammagirl - Heh?  I 'slated' you...?  I don't really understand the meaning of that word...perhaps it means disagreed?  Yes, ok I did disagree with you.  One may do that.  Did you take personal offense?  No need to  :>)

But you seem to assume that those senators are mine?  How so?  Perhaps you are thinking I am American?  No...I am German living in Spain...who once upon a very long time ago, did live many years in the US before returning to Europe.

It is ok...I notice a lot of people on forums when it is all in English, that one assumes everyone is in the US or UK.

BTW, my comments to KatyB were meant to be very tongue in cheek. But 'happily accept' about the bribes?  How did you come to understand that?  Political bribery is sadly a fact of life - anywhere.  :>}

Or is something getting lost in the translation?


Patri
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 3/2007
Patri  
 
Posted On May 18, 2007
Ok Gammagirl, I see you wish to go 'round and 'round about this.  This is not the media to do it nor is it necessary to go into long explanations about everything one says just to be certain that one is absolutely understood from all levels of a subject - which I didn't do.  This is not a subject expressed in succinct terms.

Of course, one wants to make one's own choices and not be faced with the 'lesser of two evils decision'.  Simply stating so doesn't make it so - simply because we are not the ones in control.  I don't run my own bio farm with private water supply. :>) 

So perhaps you are in a better position than I.  I do what I can here and make my own choices within that, that is reality.   There is absolutely nothing a single person can do to change the whole picture.  That can only happen collaterally and not overnight, sigh. 

If you think about it, you are faced daily with 'lesser of the two' decisions too.  I choose fresh over frozen, homemade over processed rubbish ...but are those 'fresh' always organic, always fresh?  I choose to make several personal products over buying them, but are they always better etc etc etc.  Is travelling with a car rather than a plane better - of course, but the car pollutes too.  Another 'less of the two evils choice'.   Is buying water in in plastic bottles (as I do) over tap better (because there is no water in glass and in house system is impossible), yes on one hand but no on the other.  Ok?

It is not necessary (to me) for you to agree with me.  But accept that quite possibly we have areas of agreeance, with some variation of the theme here and there, ja?  We move on now, hmmmm??



Patri
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 3/2007
Patri  
 
Posted On May 18, 2007
Gammagirl, ...sigh...I didn't realize you would consider my answer a long one. 

This seems to be a far more important issue to you than me, and my impression is that it is more important for you that you get me to agree with whatever it was on your agenda. 

I have no need to convince you (or anyone else) of my points of view.  I do have a need/right to also say what I think at a public forum that interests me.  So if you like, contact me through my website if you think you have more to say/criticize/pick at/or be nice about.  I won't be checking back here on this.  (By the way, who/what are you really angry at??)

 
 
 
Posted On May 16, 2007
John Kerry? John Kerry! (incredulously) John Kerry doesn't even need money!
But why should these guys care? They probably get their drugs for free. Maybe they are mistaking the source of their unhappiness and dissatisfaction as not having enough money, when it's actually the drugs they take and poor quality food they consume.
If we could just get them to eat according to their metabolic types, they would be happy and fulfilled instead of greedy. ^_^

 
Bridestein
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 12/2006
Bridestein  
 
 
 
Posted On May 20, 2007
Best way to put the DRUG CARTELS out of business is to avoid the DRUG DEALERS.

"Drug cartels!" --Great satire, Dr. M.!

 
saynotoquacks
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 4/2007
saynotoquacks  
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.