SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
Drug Companies Manipulate Congress With Overwhelming Lobbying

According to a report from the Center for Public Integrity, from 2005 through June 2006 drug companies spent $155 million lobbying the federal government.

This is a record-setting amount, but the spending is only likely to increase as Congress considers high-stakes drug legislation.

In addition to lobbying, drug companies spent more than $19 million in political contributions to candidates, mainly Republicans, during last year's congressional election. Also, they pay user fees to the FDA that make up more than half of that agency's budget for evaluating new drugs. The total spent by makers of drugs, medical devices and assorted health products during the period examined was nearly $182 million.

The drug industry fielded about 1,100 lobbyists in each of the last two years. They achieved many of their objectives, including upholding the ban on imports of lower-cost medications from other countries.

This year, Congress is likely to try to reconsider the prohibition against Medicare negotiating drug prices for seniors. In past years, Republican leaders have kept this legislation from being reexamined. The FDA's user-fee system will also be renewed and likely modified this year.

Pharmaceutical industry officials claimed that their spending was primarily educational and scientific, designed to ensure that new drugs get government approval to be marketed.

The Center for Public Integrity April 1, 2007

Los Angeles Times April 3, 2007 (Registration Required)


Dr. Mercola's Comment:

You are one of the fortunately informed because you are reading this article. Very few people understand that the drug companies essentially control the U.S. Congress by their massive lobbying force. Their relatively minor investment has allowed them to manipulate votes on key legislation that is highly favorable to their bottom line and almost always in conflict with your best interests.

The dollars that drug companies are burning behind the scenes to lobby the federal government and protect themselves from regulation is growing by the day. Millions upon millions are being spent to safeguard the industry from issues like Canadian drug importation and the expiration of exclusive drug patents.

Pfizer topped the pack by spending $12 million on lobbying last year; in fact, the top five drugmakers alone have spent a combined $230 million over the past eight years.

Of course, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) blasted the non-partisan Center for Public Integrity for missing "the mark when it comes to efforts by America's pharmaceutical research companies to educate policymakers." PhRMA may claim they're an advocate for patients wanting access to the products their members make, but safe and effective certainly aren't adjectives anybody would use to describe most of them.

It's no surprise at all that the United States is so focused on a drug-based model of treating disease when you follow the money. The drug companies not only lobby Congress, they also have a huge influence on the majority of published studies and nearly all of medical education.

This influence causes physicians to use their expensive symptomatic Band-Aids as solutions for people's problems instead of addressing the underlying cause.

If just a portion of the money spent on lobbying was instead allocated to nutrition, exercise, and emotional health concerns, there would be more than enough funds left over to help the more than 40 million Americans walking around without any health coverage.

But the drug companies are not out for the best interest of the public; rather, they are out for commercial gain and profit.

Related Articles:





 
 Do you find this article interesting?
Comment on This Article Community Comments (24)
 
 
Posted On Apr 09, 2007
Prescription Big Pharma Drugs - They Are Not Just For For Breakfast Anymore...As a Matter Of FACT, They Are Not For Any Safe Use At Anytime...

AS WAS CORRECT RESPONSE TO ILLEGAL DRUGS, SO TO THE SAME SAYING IS 100% CORRECT TO UNCLE SAM APPROVED ONES: 

"Just Say No"!

 
Russ Bianchi
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 9/2006
Russ Bianchi  
 
 
 
Posted On Apr 09, 2007
 The more information I come across the more disgusted I get with the U.S. Government, the FDA, and the drug companies. As far as I am concerned they are all responsible for the deaths and disabilities that people aquire as a result of taking these "tested, safe, and approved" drugs. It is not about helping people lead healthy lives! It is about padding their wallets and it is appauling. It is as if the government has forgotten the fact that we are a democracy... the people have no control over their government. The people with seats in this area of the government have gotten comfortable and made friends with people and companies that do not our best interest in mind. Don't people have a conscience or morals anymore? It is hard to fight against the drug company's budget. In this day and time money talks and that is a sad thing. : (

 
Melissa Kelly
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 3/2007
Melissa Kelly  
Replied

True Health
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 10/2006
True Health  
 
Posted On Apr 28, 2007
Amen Melissa.  This is a very good start on the problems, and where they are actually originating from and by whom. 
Dr. Brack Callahan

 


Lukane
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 4/2007
Lukane  
 
Posted On Apr 28, 2007
 Income Tax Evasion.  When all else fails a tip to the IRS can often get a crook (like Al Capone) when all else failed due to corruption.  The IRS usually responds to even anonymous tips if they are founded in fact and will take the teeth from a baby.  Nobody bothers to try to enlist them because of the bad Karma.   I've used sales tax dept. to get a business that short changed me.  (They cheated a lot of people but it was their word against the customers so they did not ring in sales.) Congressmen may not be that powerful when it comes to government getting their dough and the exposure or fear of it may stop all this evil.


anniepema
Novice User Novice User Joined On 4/2007
anniepema  
 
Posted On Apr 28, 2007
Another factor in system we have is the lack of public knowledge or public health warnings that increasing paternal age and the risk of offspring or their descendants having autoimmune disorders such as diabetes, MS, and autism or schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, Duchennes muscular dystrophy, hemophilia, prostate cancer, breast cancer, early childhood cancers,etc. is intimately connected. Also paternal age research on other disorders is not funded.  We are becoming a sicker society because no one is told the truth about the male biological clock. Advancing paternal age causes genetic disease/disorders. 


Witch Doctor
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 9/2006
Witch Doctor  
 
Posted On Apr 28, 2007
anniepema - please inform me where this knowledge about paternal age leads. I hope these children with increased risk of diabetes, MS, autism, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, Duchennes muscular dystrophy, hemophilia, prostate cancer, breast cancer, early childhood cancers,etc. are still given the opportunity to live.  Social engineering always causes more problems than it tries to solve.  Awareness is the key, and probably that is what you meant.  Interesting info.

 
 
 
Posted On Apr 09, 2007
 

Thank you so much, Dr Mercola for pointing this out!

In all my years as a Clinical Herbalist I would say the biggest majority of problems I have addressed by far have been created by drugs! With these same kind of statistics from as many natural health practitioners as I know, I would say that all it would take would be a little well placed lobbying from our side to put these drug pushers out of business!

However they wrote the book on clever manipulation! How about the American Cancer Society? They make over 400 million dollars a year. Yet not a single breakthrough has resulted from that massive collection of money.

The American Cancer Society was founded at the New York Harvard Club in 1913 by none other than John D. Rockefeller Jr. and his friends. From the start, the society was to be a "shaper of public opinion". Its goal was to urge the public to consult their doctors at the very first suspicion of cancer.

And when the same research scientists for the drug companies admit that Bloodroot cures cancer but don’t even care because they can’t make money with the whole plant, then I say, BUSTED!

And we can't forget about the Biblical side of all this! Man, are these guys in trouble!


 
The Herb Doc
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 11/2006
The Herb Doc  
Replied

anniepema
Novice User Novice User Joined On 4/2007
anniepema  
 
Posted On Apr 28, 2007
 

Earlier fathering of babies would go a long way to prevent the extra new mutations that cause cancers.  Of course one is born with genes from our ancestors,  but de novo mutations accumulate with the age of the father.  The American Cancer Society would never publish this news or allow it on their chat group sites . Thinking about the health of future generations is not the American way, but this attitude has been foster by the media that the pharmas own use to promote the glamour of older men fathering babies. Who would know that 35 is advanced paternal age. In fact 33-35 is the time when dna mutations in spermatagonia begin rapidly accumulating. Apoptosis of defective sperm slows down around 35. Of course the NIH won't fund needed research in this area. Also I found out the schizophrenia in children is now diagnosed as autism. Pretty fancy way of trying to hide the expected epidemic of schizophrenia with advancing paternal age, call it autism confuse.  Of course the NIH just gave $7.5 million to Yale to do autism research. It is just a joke. A scam.


Witch Doctor
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 9/2006
Witch Doctor  
 
Posted On Apr 28, 2007
But I would be a better Father now, because I'm older....

 
 
 
Posted On Apr 16, 2007
I had several symptoms to what I thought was the 'pre' to menopause. With brain fog, irretability, fluffy physical appearance, water retention, puffy face when waking, mood swings, break through menstral cycles, etc. I thought it was time to bring it to my ob/gyn doctor, considering i was 44 years old and my youngest of three children was graduating high school, I couldn't blame it on being overly busy or overly stressed. I could, but I've had worse days. After, explaining my symptoms to the doctor, I was told, "This is all perfectly normal for a woman of your age. You can go with one of three prescriptions." All that had to do with estrogen!!  Not happy with the band-aid I received - and reluctant to not do anything, I left and filled my prescription for the birth control pill, considering it would be most convenient for me instead of the 'patch'.  The year to follow took me back to my yearly physical with even greater distress over all the same symptoms. Needless to say I was directed once again to the birthcontrol pill at a higher dose, because my body 'had adjusted to the estrogen and needs more.' With my ignorance I filled it, I took it...and went to an alternative medicine doctor 6 months later, looking for someone that could explain why women of 40'ish years old might experience my symptoms and what I could do to help my physical side effects without taking a prescription drug. To make my long story short - I have learned my immune system is down due to the foods i was eatting, causing food allergies or intolerances. And with that have learned that amalgam fillings are not the relavant answer to dental fillings. I'm so glad I didn't take the Rx as the final answer to my health. I have made alot of changes in my food. NO processed food whatsoever - no grain, NO sugar - I had forgotten how good food really is. I lost 42 pounds and the mood swings are gone. Birth control pills are hazardous to your health.

 
healthywithoutIT
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 2/2007
healthywithoutIT  
Replied

minnie-me
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 2/2007
minnie-me  
 
Posted On Apr 16, 2007
I had a similar experience, but I walked out without a Rx. I just decided to push through these symptoms on my own. Fast forward to last fall: I decided to see a Chiropractor who specializes in wellness and nutrition. He did a non-evasive meridia stress test. He was able to identify which glands and organs did not support one another. He also told me that hot flashes were not a "rite of passage" to menopause. I began eating healthty foods, like what you  are doing, and with the proper custom supplements, I have not had a single hot flash or related mood swing. I get no headaches, joint aches or fatigue. Other than a cold this winter, I have never been healthier! I haven't taken a Rx medication in years. Hmmmm.....Big Pharma wouldn't like that, would they??? 

 
 
 
Posted On Apr 09, 2007
Let's see ... if enough of us quit using drugs, big pharma won't have money for lobbying : )

Easier said than done!

We all need to help spread Dr Mercola's message to "take control of your health" through nutrition, exercise, and dealing with stress - to friends, to family, and to legislators.  Point them to Vital Votes as a starter.  Then to Mercola.com and the WAPF for more information about improving their health without drugs.

 
Bryan - oz4caster
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 6/2006
Bryan - oz4caster  
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.