SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
Nestle Continues Reprehensible Infant Formula Actions

You have every right to be concerned about Nestle SA's recent purchase of Gerber Products, particularly in light of this alarming Guardian report about the underhanded marketing still being done to push their inferior baby formulas, along with other companies, to third-world mothers.

Even with a "code" ratified by the World Health Organization and in Bangladesh more than 20 years ago, international boycotts still remain in place because devious companies like Nestle have found loopholes that allow their products to be displayed anyway. In fact, in some cases, conglomerates appear to ignore the rules anyway.

Apparently, the source of the problem lies just where you expected it would, in the laps of pediatricians and pharmacists who are far too quick to suggest bottle-feeding whenever health problems arise in lieu of support or advice about breastfeeding. And, like their drug company counterparts in America, representatives of various formula companies are just as aggressive, and sometimes bring doctors small "gifts" (notebooks, pens and even a cake) along sheets detailing various products, knowing full well they are prohibited under the "code."

But that doesn't stop many health workers in Bangladesh from handing out product sheets to mothers -- some of whom may be illiterate -- or clinics from decorating their walls with posters of healthy-looking Caucasian babies stamped with the names of formula manufacturers that subtly undermine the worth of breastfeeding.

Just a reminder, breastfeeding is crucial to the long-term health of moms and kids. For whatever reason, if you cannot breastfeed, I urge you to review my infant formula protocol today and avoid infant soy formulas at all costs.

Guardian Unlimited May 15, 2007






 
 Do you find this article interesting?
Comment on This Article Community Comments (8)
 
 
Posted On May 16, 2007
I find it AMAZING the world survived without infant formulas, for all but about the last 75, or so, years.

If a mother could not lactate, there were the options of wet nurses, as well as raw bovine or goat's milk, to name a few.

WHO still recommends 2 years of nursing for all infants as the BEST option.

Argumentation that infant formula are safer from a pasteurization standpoint FAILS (UTTERLY - pardon the pun) to recognize the KNOWN & PROVEN lack of infant intestinal development, as well as build up in immunity from the mother, in the use of theses highly refined, nutritional dumb-downed, and only partially bioavailable, nutrient values touted in the vast majority of brands, essentially controlled by NESTLE, Ross Abbott Laboratories and Mead Johnson in the USA...with a few smaller players I have failed to mention.

The insidious BRAIN WASHING for brand loyalty goes all the way to each OB/GYN's offices, where free 'stuff' and couponing daily goes on, as well as the delivery wards, private and public, with free diaper bags, etc.  The whole system is RIGGED to try to tell mother's they need to be independent and NOT breast feed...NOTHING COULD BE FARTHER FROM THE TRUTH!!!

If you are old enough to have a child ladies, BREAST FEED, it has been proven safe, and the best option, since we as a species have existed, or for that matter all warm blooded mammalians!!!

JUST SAY NO TO INFANT FORMULAS!!!

 
Russ Bianchi
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 9/2006
Russ Bianchi  
 
 
 
Posted On May 16, 2007
The biggest thing that I see in society and when I go to my sisters, is that most use plastic bottles, infant formulas (some with soy) and then they microwave them. Three Wammy's and you out! How much more dead do they want the forumla to be?

 
Josh Rubin
Moderator User Moderator User, Joined On 6/2006
Josh Rubin  
 
 
 
Posted On May 16, 2007
This post was deleted because it violated our Terms Of Use :
Comment does not pertain to the topic of the article or does not provide value or insight to the discussion. Submit stories or comments linking to affiliate programs, multi-level marketing schemes, or off-topic content or any other system that will result in your personal financial or commercial gain.

 
Katy B
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 3/2007
Katy B  
Replied

Ray Esther M
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 5/2007
Ray Esther M  
 
Posted On May 19, 2007
Here, Here!

I think the worst bit is that people in developing countries do not have the income to do this never mind all the other stuff about infant formula and dirty water. They end up watering the formula down more to make it go further with the resultant problems. I know missionaries in Africa and have been there myself and seen what happens. I have had discussions with friends here in the UK and have dared to suggest that it could even be a very clever conspiracy to keep down the population in these countries. Am I going too far?

We have 5 children, and my wife breast fed all of them, one son in particular was still having some until he was four! I seem to recall that she also breast fed at least one foster baby that we had.

As a family we decided to boycott all Nestle products when we first heard of what they were doing quite a number of years ago. I know they won't notice unless a majority does this, but at least it helps my consience to know that I am not assisting.

Ray

 
 
 
Posted On May 17, 2007
As a breastfeeding mother and aspiring midwife, I am appalled at the mere idea of formula feeding. Not only do I see this causing health and developmental issues in this country, but I can only imagine what it is doing to underpriviliged children in other countries. I think that the efforts og international midwifery programs should be strengthened and are a great way to fend off the formula peddling OBs and pediatricians. The Peace Corps would also be another organization that could take this project under their wing. I would love to see non-profit organizations obliterate the market of such an insidious company.

 
jennifer howard
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 1/2007
jennifer howard  
 
 
 
Posted On May 16, 2007
I've been boycotting Nestle since I was a young girl in the 1970s.  Back then the only way it affected me was that I couldn't buy a Nestle Crunch bar.  I did keep the junior high marching band from using a Crunch bar as a fundraiser, though the teacher did think I was a bit crazy. ;) 

Now it is very difficult for most people to avoid everything Nestle owns.  If you make your own food and don't use a lot of hair/ skin/ makeup products, it's still not a huge deal. 

I'll be in trouble if they ever buy out the rancher down the road.

Amanda

 
Amanda Rose
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 6/2006
Amanda Rose  
Replied

Ray Esther M
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 5/2007
Ray Esther M  
 
Posted On May 20, 2007
I know what you mean. Here in the UK we are very aware, those of us who pay atention, that all the old companies are slowly being bought up by Nestle. Yes I am glad that we produce a fair amount of our own meat and veg, but we try and bulk buy raw ingredients so avoid Nestle that way. Our children are aware of our boycott of their products, and they keep each other right if they are buying sweets or chocolate bars!

 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.